>>525826997
no, because it also has an economic or religious doctrine for example. ethnic nationalism (or what used to be called simple nationalism) is just love of an ethnic group

>>525826997
No. It's for all Europeans. The point was to unite all of Europe under the Swastika and make Europe invincible.

>>525827260
that's also blatantly not true, they were germany first. they had to propagandize it into a pan-european movement to help stop communism but they definitely were deutschland uber alles

>>525826997
Its a jew made word to demonize the German national socialist party

Generally the people obsessed with the term don't understand basic economics let alone politics and so nuance is redundant.

>>525827428
More like Anglo/Nordic first. Hitler wasn't even German remember, he was Austrian.

>>525827260
> all europeans
meanwhile in the real world we see many political figures dividing whites, saying meds aren't white, saying slavs aren't white, etc
fucking embarrassing that you use that memeflag

>>525827260
Pretty much, although it was more western Europe.
Hitler wasn't a fan of Slavs.

>>525826997
National Socialism is related to whichever nation you live