[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1607019308525.png (2.05 MB, 1920x1080)
2.05 MB
2.05 MB PNG
First, imagine you're a normalfag retail investor. You take your life savings and invest in some companies you really believe in like you went heavily into Intel and IBM in the 90s. You're fuuuuucked. Their values are worse than they were in the 90s. You are completely at the whims and mercy of the market.

Now imagine you are a billionaire investor. You buy shares in some companies you really believe in. And these would be signicfant holdings and you'd have substantial power in these companies. But say these companies crash horrifically in share price. Is that a terrible thing for you? Remember you really believe these were fundamentally great companies. It would be the best thing that could happen to your investment. You could now buyout these companies for pennies on the dollar or buy majority shares. You'd now run these companies and could turn them around however you want.

You can't compete against someone that can't lose



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.