Also ignore belter posts. They never say anything valuable.

Debate?

>>525892943
What’s wrong with saying obviously true things?

File: 1756461970285830.png (53 KB, 424x299)

53 KB PNG

>>525892943

>>525892943
>None of these issues are based on anything objective and are so sweepingly broad that there is no possible way for you to win.
bro did you ever read a single platonic dialogue
once you start with the greeks it gets so easy, they literally invented dialectics, the art of arriving at the Truth from two disparate viewpoints
and oftentimes you'll find yourself way closer to the Truth than your opponent and will adjust your course during the debate only slightly while he'll have to concede much more
>is america great
start by setting up a bottomline, defining what "great" means in this context for your opponent, then what it means for you, and try to arrive at the conclusion yourself either fitting both definitions or explaining why your opponent's definition is not that good and yours is better

homosexuality
start by defining the problem yourself and asking what the solution is, what ideal society each party envisions, and end up proving how your vision of society is fundamentally better, healthier and more sound than what your opponent proposes
etc.

>>525892943
i don't come here to debate anything. it's a cesspool of legitimately 60-80 IQ retards, half of whom have fried their brains with social media and hard drugs.

if you use /pol/ for anything beyond trolling and riling up retards, you're a fool.

>>525893127
>What’s wrong with saying obviously true things?
hello my name is JD Vance and I am running for president in 2028. Black people commit more crimes than white people and women are not physically able to compete with males in professional sports...... why are you booing?

>>525892943
I got into an argument with somebody that claimed that men didn't have a physiological advantage over women in sports. I had no idea this wasn't normally accepted like water is wet.

>>525893251
thats very specific, you can get into debates about gender issues if they are about a very specific objective aspect of it. But just talking about "women in society" there is no possible way for you or anyone else to win.

"immigration" is also almost that vague. It always gets into moral or objective debates about nationalism with no clear answer.

>>525893249
In other words your Trotskyite ideology cannot actually prove itself vs biological and natural truths, and factual statistics?

>>525893249
>Black people commit more crimes than white people
you'd get booed not because youre not right but more because, what do you want to achieve with that? send 'em all back to africa as johnny rebel said? that is bound to attract boos, you yourself might have that token black friend or two and wouldnt want them get sent back to africa
in serious politics only serious propositions apply, such as e.g. how would you do away with ghettos & black criminality WITHOUT getting rid of all black people. if you have no other solutions just shut up

>>525893338
listen you autist, there are tons of things that are true that you can talk about on 4chan but if you say them in front of peoples grandmas people are going to get really angry

"16 year old girls are usually more attractive than 40 year old women"
(objectively scientifically true)
all that would happen would be a massive outcry about how you are a literal pedophile and that some bullshit statistic says that 45 year old women are way hotter than barely legal snatch

>>525893425
>people are going to get really angry
So what?
Plato’s Republic
Savages in a cave
You think I fucking care?
50,000 rifles are more important than 50,000,000 votes

>>525893518
usually debates are not won when someone pulls out a gun

>>525893592
Why debate undesirables
The only language a communist, a hostile alien, and race traitors understand is violence