>>525920730>optionaljust like the tele loicense
>>525920730Based as fuck, I give you redcoats credit where credit is due. Fuck kike starmer
>>525920730If they're still putting the system into place in any capacity it's only a matter of time before they force it on everyone.We both know they'll manufacture an excuse.Use the extra time to prepare accordingly.
>>525920730>Scheme intended to verify someone's right to work in UKFuck these propagandists. You don't hate them enough.
>>525920923that literally is optional though lol
Don't they need ID to buy porn or post on social media?
>>525921127no, pajeet, that's texas
>>525920730>ditchedlollmao
>>525921107>neighbor heard me watching a video
>>525920730>optionalconsider it mandatory you fucking retards
no link? fuck off
It's a start, though at the same time companies are increasingly required to ID people on their platforms or face fines.They're going to bring this in one way or another.Any age verification bullshit needs to disappear and only then we can say that digital ID has been at least temporarily halted.
>>525920730>it's optional>you just won't have access to your bank account if you don't sign up
>>525920730Serious question, how was this any different than a physical ID?
When Farage become PM next year and reintroduces this under the pretext of securing the UK's borders, bongs will be think this is the greatest idea ever.
>>525921107Of course
lol Starmer is such a dickless faggot.
>>525921464google is free
>>525920730Ireland will still push super hard for one, because we ALWAYS do whatever the UK proposes, but six months later and somehow simultaneously make it more onerous and administer it less competently
>>525921569>and reintroduces this under the pretext of securing the UK's borders, bongs will be think this is the greatest idea ever.that was the pretext this time, and no we did not
>>525921662Why not? Starmer is right on this one. IDs are a great way of securing election integrity.
Good for those cucks. First thing they have done right in years. Won't stop the gov from trying again.
>>525920730coward, Starmer can be pushed around, START PUSHING STARMERHe's a pussy.
>>525921662>that was the pretext this time, and no we did notThey'll manufacture an immigrant attack of some sort, the people will riot and demand the government does something, then they'll push it through unopposed.You cunts never learn.
>>525920730>optionalSo they are gonna make it that you have to jump true 50 flaming hoops on rollerblades while singing the anthem backward or get the ID but it is optional. Great
>>525921736We do use ID for voting since a few years back. Just a passport or driving license. No one wants digital ID...
>>525921942Farage is the next wunder kid. He will sell the UK for a nickels to the mutts and the bongs would love it because of muh conservative pm.
>>525920730I refuse to believe that the globohomo is folding so easily. But the reality is the shitskins always push back the most on these things. Just like with hoaxvid. They want to replace us with shitskins but the same shitskins they use to devalue the economy also don't hesitate to riot over globohomo shit. So maybe just another>jewish IQmoment.
>>525921542Digital ID was directly linked to your activity on your ISP and banking info. Currently the CIA can track what you do easily, sure, but the point of digital ID is to make it easy enough so some indian wagie at your town hall can see you bought too mucb beef or liked too many memes so they're cutting off your access to X, Y, or Z. It's the same as China's social credit system that kicks you off job prospects or even buses if you say bad things about the government. The tech already exists and the government can already do it, yes, bit digital ID makes it easy enough for their brown slave caste to enforce on you.
>>525922052>Just a passport or driving license. No one wants digital ID...What's the difference? what do these IDs give the gov that they already don't have?
>>525920990You can try to force a tiger to eat brussels sprouts until you're blue in the face. Them cats ain't eating that shit. Governments and corpos working with them can fuck off or die.
>>525922118It's... digital...
>>525922114They already know everything they need. This changes nothing.
>>525922114Bingo.
>>525922114>Digital ID was directly linked to your activity on your ISP and banking infoit actually wasn't, but that was the fear people had.
>>525922202It's just a bait and switch. Propose a thing that the public gets mad about and then pull it. You guys fall for it every time.
>>525922071>Farage is the next wunder kid. He will sell the UK for a nickels to the mutts and the bongs would love it because of muh conservative pm.I bet he's got the same shitskin entourage that our "conservative" controlled OP party does.
>>525920990Even this move is a great form of manipulation now the digital ID is normalized and people are happy it’s optional
>>525922330well not everyone can be a super genius like you. you are very smart
>>525920730>verify someone’s right to work What the fuck does this even mean? What is a right to work? People are essentially slaves forced into working. What do that mean by verify a right? A right is inalienable and if you can’t engage in that right without some faggy hoop to jump through then it isn’t a right.
so websites aren't going to keep requiring identification to prove you are an adult or does that stay?
>>525922352He's even worse than that. He fucked the bongs with Brexit and now he will anally rape them to death.
>>525922384I know I'm under utilized.
>>525922225>this level of reading comprehensionAs expected of a 93 IQ nation
take the win, even if it's temporaryat the very least it makes him look bad
>>525922527We have digital IDs here. It changed nothing.
>>525920730But i was assured by an Iranian street shitter that not only was this happening despite massive popular backlash but that 4chan was also going to be sued into oblivion because their lawyers spanked some unknown Bong bureaucrat into being butthurt.
>>525920730Smart move on their part, they're going to need to spend all their time, resources, and effort rounding up white brits to ship off to die for Israel instead of dealing with digital ID enforcement.You bongs think this is a win, but it's confirmation you'll be eating beans on toast in the desert before dying for jews.
>>525922687Good for you moshe
lol yeah having a bank account is also "optional". Try getting anything done without one and find out just how optional it is.
>>525922831>rounding up white brits to ship off to die for Israelunlike you guys, we don't give israel billions in aid
Will the US reject it?I doubt it.
>>525922971>we don't give israel billions in aidyou can't afford it i'm afraid.
>>525922971No, you just gave them a country.
>>525923083kek this. The Brits did all of the heavy lifting.
>>525920923>>525920730Optional means they will take their time with the compulsory rollout
eww a kike how disgusting
>>525922114How does a physical ID make you immune to this?
>>525922971Churchill was an ardent zionist
>>525921014You don't believe Labour? How about their reasoning to ban X, surely just about naughty pics no?
>>525922971no u jsut let them build weapons in the uk instead
Now get rid of the Online Safety Act
>>525921107If I bought a TV to be a glorified monitor for a media PC, but never intended to watch broadcast TV, would I need to obtain one?
>>525920730Another U-turn eh, Keir Starmer? Can you reverse your appointment to prime minister now?
>>525923394no. and even if you did watch TV, there is no way for them to enforce it, hence why millions do not pay
>>525920730There should've been public hangings for anyone even suggesting digital ID
>>525923463I thought they had a database of TV purchases and some kind of triangulator vans.
>>525920990Global Mega 9/11 with nukesNormies will beg for slave shackles with Star of Remphan on it
>>525923532No they just send you letters and try to badger you into giving them money for their social engineering channels
>>525921662It was too silly for British lads.>"We need Digital ID so we can catch illegals who don't have ID">doesn't that mean illegals also won't have digital ID?>"n-NO SHUT UP"
>>525923532nah
>>525920730It was never going to happen lads. That was something like the 6th time they've tried to implement national IDs.
>>52592073013th U-turn cardiac arrest
>>525923532They do have a database of TV purchases. the stasi vans are a considerable stretch.
>>525923739
>>525923999>They do have a database of TV purchasesno they don't, sanjeet
>>525924052They do, it's mainly large retailer that deal in electronic goods who supply any details.
>>525924439Show flag pajeet
based
>>525924532you first.
>>525924562Lowe is the only MP I trust. Really great guy.
>>525920730>DIGITAL ID DITCHED AFTER BRITS SAY NO>DIGITAL ID SHELVED AFTER BRITS SAY NO (TO BE FORCED ON THEM AT A LATER DATE UNDER THE GUISE OF NATIONAL SECURITY REASONS)
>>525921569Dream on, Synagogue of Satan.
>>525924783He likes guns and shooting, absolutely confirmed not a faggot.
>>525920730He said this months ago. But I know you retards only consume the biased right wing media so you wouldn't be aware.
>>525920730They need to ban smart phones for minors, its simple.
>>525921736Nope.
>>525923258They can't track the location of a card wrapped in aluminum/tin foil
>>525920730Sad. I want social media to die.
>>525921542Well, you don't get your ID revoked lose access to your job and bank account because of Internet comments for one.
>>525923394Unironically yes. The other anon is wrong. Any TV in your house = loicence.Even if you watch BBC iPlayer on your computer = oi, you paid yer loicence?The cuckening is severe.However lots of people (wogs) simply do not pay. And they won't enforce on wogs.However if you're hypothetically a white anon who likes learning about illegal facts and saying illegal words on internet forums for a laugh, then you might not want to give the bastards any reason to get in to your business and you think "this cuck tax is only £150 a year and I can easily afford it so I will pay this protection money in this instance".
>>525921736>electionsAh yes the goy opinion box that has famously changed many things in history.
>>525922105Anon I think you might've just nailed it. The whole reason COVID Passports failed here is because they couldn't give them to illegals and if they did Republicans would use it as a list of who to target and where so they had to kill it. It was probably that they didn't have a way to force the invaders to do it and weren't able to successfully roll it out just for White people quite yet (possibly because of there's a process for just not using it then Whites could start claiming they were visiting from America or something and eventually they would just stop checking anyone) so they had to walk it back while they figure out a work around.That, or the Maduro thing spooked Starmer since Trump said he has problem going after EU despots and he's been talking all kinds of smack about Trump and threatening to sue U.S.A. companies and kidnap out citizens and imprison them for life over internet comments. He'd obviously be the next target and going full 1984 on the English would be the straw that broke the camel's back in regards to literally no one caring at all if he got snatched up by a SEAL team.
>>525925941
Imagine, people used to not have passports at all. Could travel anywhere you wanted.
>>525922118Putting things on the computer is always the wrong idea. You shouldn't NEED an ID in the first place. Driver's licenses were originally just a B.S. tax for the government to collect a few extra bucks and now not only do you need it just to operate a motor vehicle you can't leave the house without it because ofnthe pelthora of different ways they've found to force you to display it to do any number of things. Putting it on the computer would be disastrous. You'd need it just to unlock your computer within the decade.
>>525923532We used to have vans like that but it turned out they were fake and were just bluffing people into paying lol
>>525922330What does that accomplish other than eroding any or all public support they had, khazarian "jew"?
>>525920730>optionalFor immigrants.
>>525927541Your argument gets increasingly deranged as you go on.Republicans are not serious about deporting illegals and third world scum. Some of them say they are, but they are not being sincere. You fell for it.And Zognald is not going to arrest a good goy like Sir Keir. Although funny story for you, at work some normies were hand wringing about Maduro and I joked that I hope they do it to Starmer next. The idea had not even occurred to them and they pondered what I said in horrified silence rather than laugh.Fucking normies.
>>525927889You're just seething.
>>525927606How do da card pay moni?
>>525927347nah thats rubbishI only use my tv for vidya and youtube etc and the LOICENSE website has an option for that
>>525927714The only reason we have all these restrictions and laws is because of people fucking up every goodwill honor system. Thanks to the internet everyone is finally learning it's jews and browns, and how to solve it, genocide or christian moral based eugenics.
>>525928308I accept I haven't looked at it for years but I did check when I last moved and I definitely needed the loicence just for having a TV in the house.I really hate the BBC though, especially after what they did to Richard Hall, so maybe I need to check again.
>>525920730Happy for ya britbros, now someone go kill starmer for us FFS.
>>525920730>optional>voluntaryThis the exact playbook of India's aadhaar card.If you don't sign up, be ready for citizenship death.
>>525928498So what penalties and fees would someone have to pay if they choose to opt out of any of these "abandoned" policies?In the USA we had the Obama care penalty for not using Obamacare.
>>525925339Should we read the Guardian like you do Adrian mate?
>>525920730>FELLOW GOYIM DESPAIR THERE IS NOTHING TO BE DONE!Signs petition>REEEEE THAT WILL ACHIEVE NOTHING YOU'LL SEE!Digital ID Scrapped!>REEEEE STOP INACTING POSITIVE CHANGE I WANT YOU TO DESPAIR!Not today tranny!
>>525927347lmao this guy's been intimidated by the telly jannies
>>525920990Yah pretty much how it works. They will slowly try to introduce it then call it something else like a national identity or some other shit. They aren't going to throw in the towel. The EU didn't and they want to force it on Australians/Canadians with the expectation that we will just comply eventually.
>>525920730This is just fucking sad at this point.
>>525920730Oh yeah? Just like how the (((vaxx))) was 'optional' if you wanted to do anything as a first class citizen?
bongsisters , muh kids safetehh??
>>525928857I dunno. I just didn't want to deal with it. But now this anon >>525929394 is saying I've been scared off by the telejannies.Problem is that I do have an idiot box now although the only time it ever goes on is when I have people over. My family are all normies and keep telling me I need to have a TV and pay my loicence otherwise people will think I'm weird. So I'm locked in now.Fucking hell I hate clown world. I'm going to go read.
>>525929637Um chuddie it was optional. Your right to work and right to a gym, school, and groceries is also optional according to us. You don't want to kill some hypothetical grandma who already took the vaccine would you?!?
>>525927347>However lots of people (wogs) simply do not pay. And they won't enforce on wogs.LOL if you actually pay itfucking retard
>>525927743> Putting it on the computer would be disastrousWhere does the information on our cards come from?
>>525921518>it's optionalfor browns. whites still required
>>525920923fpbp
>>525920730Were you born yesterday? They will scrap it and then push harder real quick after an inciting incident.
>>525920730I am against digital id, because in the end, it would be used as a totalitarian tool, but if i wanted to implement it. i would leave people alone and covert make it an obligation for newborns after a specific year. This way those with id never saw a life without it and those who didn't want it aren't bothered by a forced implementation of it. However, not all evil plans are fail-proof; someone could be aware of the scheme, and you use the good old gaslight and conspiracy nutjob. you demoralize the voice so bad no one believe him or her.
>>525923463Do you have that rule where they try to get you to pay a loicence for literally any device including not only phones and radios but even 20 year old MP3 players and whatnot?Here they will list electronic devices until you say "yes" to literally anything that uses electricity, in order to to try and trick you into signing the papers. The correct move is to start insulting, berating and abusing them as soon as you see them and answer no questions. Although they only appear once in 15 years maybe, I've never even seen them personally.
>>525929795Not paying the loicence is easier for someone who rents a flat and owns nothing (but is happy) than for someone who owns a house and has shit to lose for example. They won't bother hassling you if they don't think they can get anything out of you.Have also had a few brushes with things that were closer than I'd have liked, during and in particular immediately after the scamdemic. I don't want the government to think they have any pretext to harass me.And I am actually going to go read now.Will check this in the archive later so don't worry I will read any replies shitting on me.
>>525921107>It's optional but declining it means you let us take away a shit ton of things from you :)Kill yourself.
>>525930299Just insult them bro. Just tell them you fucked their whore mothers despite knowing you'll get HPV, because you had to prove a point to them. Just tell them you haven't used any electronic devices in decades because you don't want mind control antennas in your house or some shit.
>>525930282no
>>525930529>let us take away a shit ton of thingslol what. tv license is 100% optional
>>525931152Why do I have to give the BBC money to watch services they don't provide?I'm being rhetorical of course, the answer is blatant corruption. Don't reply to this because if I could spit at you through the internet I would. I don't pay it btw.
>>525930116If nothing else one can just try again a few years later!
>>525922171You're not a tiger though. you're a goy
>>525931419muh corruption.it's an old, outdated system that is kept in place because the BBC would collapse without a decent number of people paying up.if you don't want to pay, then don't. no need to bitch about it
Good but its not over yet. I still anticipate a major false flag to force us into using it. Massive cyber attack and blackouts to scare people into using digital ID.
>>525932204>it's an old, outdated system that is kept in place because the BBC would collapse without a decent number of people paying up.LIKE I FUCKING SAID YOU STUPID FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT NIGGERCORRUPTIONTHERE'S AN OLD SAYING:BRITISH LAW IS THE BEST MONEY CAN BUYFUCK YOUDIEDIEDIEYOU PIECE OF UTTER GUTTER TRASHI WANT YOU TO CHOKE ON YOUR OWN STOMACH BILE TONIGHT
>>525932491>BRITISH LAW IS THE BEST MONEY CAN BUYfucking redditor lmfao
>>525920730>OptionalStill not enough
>>525921127I wish that was a worldwide law being the schizo I am I would never give my ID to a kike site, f porn, free heroin for the masses destroying many lives
>>525932586THE SOLE REASON THE TV LICENSE STILL EXISTS IS SO THE TORIES CAN SAY THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT ABOLISHING IT THREE DAYS BEFORE AN ELECTION TO WIN VOTESALSO KNOWN AS CORRUPTIONI HOPE YOU FUCKING DIE
>>525933186>everything I don't like is corruptionlol you must be 18 to post here, kid
>>525923394No. You can even buy a TV and not pay the license. See below.>>525927347WRONG. Go read the law you stupid faggot. You ONLY need to buy a license, if you WATCH or RECORD LIVE TV, AS IT IS BEING BROADCAST (catch-up is exempt) on ANY channel. You also need it if you watch BBC Iplayer. You can sit watching catch-up TV, downloaded porn, games anything on your TV and not need a license. The license is for watching Live broadcasts. Do not engage with the letters. Do not engage with TV Licensing. Do not engage with any goons (salesmen) from Capita that call around on their behalf (say no thankyou and shut the door), unplug and/or cut any aerials, and de-tune if possible.Do not watch or record Live TV or watch IPlayer, and nothing will happen, as you'll be complying with the law. Simple as.
>>525928498No you don't. The law/license is for watching / recording Live TV or using Iplayer. Nothing more, nothing less. Simply owning a TV has nothing to do with that, unless you're (caught) using it for the purposes above. Having it fully set up, tuned in / whatever would of course go against you, should they obtain a warrant (which if you comply with the law and therefore can't be seen / caught using it, that shouldn't be possible). Don't remove Implied Right of Access, as if they have any other evidence, they can use that as justification for a warrant. Also don't talk to any goons at the door. The majority of convictions (by unprofessional magistrates) are obtained via people answering questions and in some instances, goons outright lying (and even raping, in one case).
>>525923394>>525927347technically you're both incorrectif you purchased an old TV with only analogue capabilities you wouldn't need to pay unless you got a freeview box newer TVs that come with freeview, you need to pay the licenceold TV's and broken TV's are fine though
>>525933970Another example for not engaging with the goons: The BBC/TV Licensing took a member of the public's own video and fabricated it to convict him of evading the TV License.Some details are here, Michael Shakespeare vs TV Licensing, 20 September 2011, Basildon Crown Court:Transcript: https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/the-man-who-fought-back-against-the-bbc-and-won/Description: https://tv-licensing.blogspot.com/2012/04/tv-licensings-vexatious-pursuit-of.htmlBBC's Edited Footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C83QybcH9Qc (superimposed image from The One show visible at 1:10)
>>525934343Not true. Nothing to do with Freeview. The license is for if you WATCH or RECORD Live TV (as it is being broadcast), OR use Iplayer. It is those ACTS that require the license, not the mere possession of a TV.Don't watch Live TV = Complying with the law.There's so much misinformation around this, it's ridiculous.
>>525934343https://www.gov.uk/find-licences/tv-licence>You need a TV Licence if you:>watch or record live TV on any channel or service>use BBC iPlayer>You do not need a TV Licence to watch:>streaming services like Netflix and Disney Plus>on-demand TV through services like All 4 and Amazon Prime Video>videos on websites like YouTube>videos or DVDsIt's SO fucking simple I don't know how all these mongo's still parrot the "if you have a TV you must pay the license" BS. The IQ of this country is ridiculously low.Do you think the "detector vans" actually work, too?
>>525920923>>525920730yeah, optional as in the way of the company having the option to enforce it on the employees. You wanna get hired at x place? you need an D.ID
>>525920730Those damn Goyims ...https://youtu.be/KwAOMU4E2ao
>>525920730>"Optional"Optional like the jab more likely, they're going to cause your life so much fucking inconvenience unless you get it I bet. Compliance by Bureaucracy
>>525920730This happens because Tony Blair was thrown out of the lodge of the elites lmao. It's because UK sided with muslims instead of israel.
>>525934774we're watching you, anontread lightly.
>>525920730All the government wants is more control more power more more more until your shackled in chains you do nothing just pop out more babies for them to consume
