Keir Starmer MELTS DOWN over Bikini images of him generated by Grok users, threatens to completely ban X in the UK and sue Elon Musk: “It’s disgraceful. It’s disgusting and it’s not to be tolerated. This is wrong. It’s unlawful. We’re not going to tolerate it. It’s disgusting. X has got to get a grip! Ofcom has full support to take, um, action. This is wrong. It’s unlawful we’re not going to tolerate it”https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZN38WcwunKA
https://youtube.com/shorts/t5m_JOXv7Jc
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ot_RJy-Gc1s
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq845glnvl1oThe UK will bring into force a law which will make it illegal to create non-consensual intimate images, following widespread concerns over Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot.Speaking to Labour MPs on Monday, Sir Keir Starmer warned X could lose the "right to self regulate"."If X cannot control Grok, we will," he said, adding the government would act quickly in response to the issue.The government also plans to unveil legislation to make it illegal to supply online tools used to create such images.The BBC has approached X for comment. It previously said: "Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content."https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq845glnvl1o
https://news.sky.com/story/starmer-threatens-to-control-grok-if-elon-musks-x-keeps-creating-sexual-images-13493537It comes hours after Ofcom announced it was launching an investigation into X over "deeply concerning reports" about Grok altering images of people.If found to have broken the law, Ofcom can potentially issue X with a fine of up to 10% of its worldwide revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater.And if X does not comply, Ofcom can seek a court order to force internet service providers to block access to the site in the UK altogether.In a statement, Technology Secretary Liz Kendall urged the regulator not to take "months and months" to conclude its investigation, and demanded it set out a timeline "as soon as possible".It is currently illegal to share deepfakes of adults in the UK, but legislation in the Data (Use and Access) Act which would make it a criminal offence to create or request them has not been enforced until now, despite passing in June 2025.
oop
>>525924392If UK government can't control Paki rape gangs...
>>525923898>paki flagDefinitely made by a filthy jeet. Total Shitskin Death when?
>>525923898The eurotards are such unserious people
>>525923898This is now an illegal image of the most disliked prime minister in the UK's history of hated PM's, one of which, tony blair, was literally in a secret society specifically stated to screw civilisation.
>>525925031You will be arrested for posting thatEven possessing that image is illegal under starmer’s britain lmao
.
>>525923898The proper reply would have been laughter.What a thin-skinned loser.Brits, please replace your government before it finishes exterminating you.
>>525923898We need a more tolerant Great Britain.
how come the bongs haven't banned 4chan yet
>>525925031Top kek that one should be sent directly to him.Imagine not laughing about this shit. Hes so far up his own ass with ego he cant help but be a thin skinned bitch about every criticism.
>>525923898Anglos are THE WORST.
>>525923898Any picture of Kier Starmer is disgusting, AI generated or not.
>>525923898he looks like an enlish Mobster from the series Lilyhammer
>>525923898>>525924263>>525924502he looks like he's about to cry, lol
>>525926102>The proper reply would have been laughter.about the pictures of himself, yeah it would have been.but he also has the issue of women getting what the government are calling "intimate images" of them made and sent around which is already a british crime under several laws, so while i think starmer is a twat, he is having to look at the issue with a wider lens because he has every woman in parliament, the media and the "mood of the nation" in a fizz over these grok images. which means he has to be Mr Serious-Stern because it is imageRape and all that sort of shit.
>>525924392>non-consensual intimate images>picture at the beach
>>525923898A Pakini
>>525924502>OfcomGo to hell
>>525923898Who says its AI, those are real...Its butthole is dripping with SuperJew...
>>525925031>Starmer Sutra
>>525927062Did he comment on the issue before AI displayed him as the whore he is?
>>525928013What if they're not made with AI?
This guy is the worst. Hopefully the USA blackbags him to gitmo.
lmao I love this
The LickSpittal should have chosen a more modest bikini?
>>525923898Hahaha that Pakistani bikini photo is career destroying meme potency. Nobody is ever going to take him seriously after this. It's literally over.
>>525923898There's a controversial theory I want to share with you: boomers in western countries are clinically retarded. That's it. Anybody else in that state would get frequent visits from family members and remarks about replacing a gas stove with an electrical one in casual conversations. Everything else, jews, black magic cults, financial machinations and pedo blackmails, all of it is just a tiny addition to it.
I would have those posted in every window & phone-pole in town...
>>525923898shithole problems
>>525923898Kiersten Starmer is a proud and beautiful lesbian woman of colour and I'm frankly tired of pretending otherwise.
>>525923898Starmer should be paid a nickel royalty by twitter for each picture generation
>>525928704indeed, and what if it's by a talented arist?
>>525928977>There's a controversial theory I want to share with you: boomers in western countries are clinically retarded.They are poisoned by organolead additives to gasoline. I read a study that found that lead poisoning generates reckless behavior and selfishness before it starts to affect IQ. In simpler terms, it turns people into boomers. Lead additives started to be phased out in the early 70s, depending on where you live.
>>525925031ya really think it is kinda funny and based to ai generate low quality pictures?
>>525928704Kek
>New Ukip logo slated over 'similarities to Nazi symbol'thoughts?
>>525929595disregard meant for brit/
>>525929485Donna udderly mogs Kiersten
>>525929595It does actually look cool, at the very least. Doubt there is much spirit behind it though.
>>525929595Bismarck confirmed nahtzee
>>525929485Mr president, I would NOT pull out!
>>525923898>Farage: It's horrible, it's disgusting, it's good that X is taking steps like restricting access, but it needs to go further.When will people realize that Farage is part of the 1 party system where they slowly increase restrictions more and more under the guise of "common sense moderation"?Starmer goes 100% censorship, then Farage goes 60% censorship. Then they compromise on 80%. Such a fucking joke.
>>525923898lmao thats clearly an image of muhammad thoughever.
>>525925031kekgod save the queen
>>525923898>>525924040>>525929485>>525925031
>>525923898By applying for office as a public representative you implicitly accept to tolerate the most vile form of ridicule. The way you deal with it shows your true character, wich the people must know to know who truly represents them. Punishment just shows they chose the wrong person for the job. They have to be vile to see whats behind this „strong leader“. In a democracy, our democracy, it is the peoples job to constantly and unhingedly attack their representatives, not only to see who they chose but to constantly remind them that they can and will and have their right to do so. Remember as a public official, in a liberal democracy YOU serve the people, you are their slave, they even pay you to govern them. Its only logical. The people wouldn’t do their job if they were not ridiculing their officials, and you are not doing yours if you get butthurt queer starmer. Also men are women now, you should pose in a bikini anyway
