if u look at the sky at night things are constantly moving, ive been stargazing since the 80's, so no its not some new *starlink* or drone explaination normies give you, these mother fucking things will change size, brightness, speed, color, if you stare at them its like they know you are looking at them, some will be stationary for a 5 minutes than go 0. instant speed across the sky >inb4 why don't you record it>its hard to get these things on camera >telescopes make it look blurryEvery normie i talk to about this just say its sate lights. Yep those things that just teleport are satelight. its like when normies say they never seen the moon out at day time lol this world is cursed and we are being watched, normies are weird for never bringing this up. everyone must just go to sleep as soon as the suns down, how the fuck do people never look at the night sky anymore
You are not alone
>>525934269>these mother fucking things will change size, brightness, speed, colorStars are balls of plasma.Their light comes from the phenomenon called "electrical arc discharge".in the Electric Star model, there is no minimum temperature or mass requirement.a stars location on the HR diagram only depends on its size and the electric current density it is presently experiencing.if, for whatever reason, the strength of that current density should change then the star will change its position on the HR diagram, like FG Sagittae, abruptly. Otherwise, no movement from one place to another on that plot is to be expected.And its age remains indeterminate regardless of its mass or spectral type.This is disquieting in the sense that we are now confronted by the knowledge that our own Suns future is not as certain as is predicted by mainstream jew astronomy.We cannot know whether the Birkeland current presently powering our Sun (yes stars are actually externally powered and not internally) will increase or decrease, nor how long it will be before it does so.
>>525934269Those things are angels, they saved Hitler back in 45
>>525934269The best ones are the ones that flash a color for a moment and then zip away suddenly.
>>525934269There is this famous double slit experiment where particles of light only behave like particles when they know you are testing them, but act like a wave when they think you aren't looking. It's really fucky.
>>525934269I had a close encounter with one of them. Like you say they zip around fast. Well one of them came straight towards me and landed close. Out jumped your mother, we fucked, then she told me she was going to travel back in time to give birth to you. Now go outside and play on Dominion Road.
>>525935056Did they shoot him or something lol
>>525934927>the HR diagram is a plot of actual observations, not something deduced from theory.A major question is:>Why do stars tend to group themselves together in certain ways on this diagram?perhaps the most important factor in determining any given star’s characteristics is the strength of the current density in Amperes per square meter (A/m2) measured at that star’s surface.If a star’s incoming current density increases, the arc discharges on its surface (photospheric tufts) will get hotter, change color (away from red, toward blue), and get brighter.The absolute brightness of a star, therefore, depends on two things: the strength of the current density impinging into its surface, and the star’s size (the star’s diameter).Therefore, we add another scale to the horizontal axis of the HR diagram,>“Current Density at the Star’s Surface.”Consider moving from the lower right of the HR diagram toward the left.In so doing, we are moving in the direction of increasing current density measured at the surface of each star.The first region on the lower right of the diagram is where the current density has such a low value that the plasma surrounding the (anode) star is not driven into the normal glow mode of operation, let alone arc mode.This is a region where only dark current plasma surrounds these objects (gas giants, brown dwarfs etc.).
>>525935822
I noticed during the NJ drone hype i was looking at 3 faint stars and one was moving back and forth between and past the 2 other stars, it was definitely not air turbulence otherwise the other 2 would have moved. About as bright as a satellite would be back before they started painting the bottoms black.
>>525935720soiviets found a body double, real Hitler got out
>>525934927That's why we are actively manipulating the sun via our own ionosphere and magnetosphere through parametric resonance with the cosmic particles bombarding us from all angles.A bunch of ionosphereic heaters (or high powered radar like pic rel) working in tandem can do a lot.
No one sees the moon during the day? Wtf how glued are ppl to their phones?
>>525934269ive been seeing weird shit in the sky for decades and everyone told me its nothing shut up schizo
>>525934269How about you give the stars some fucking privacy you creep. You’ve been staring at them long enough.
I looked at Orion the other night and every single star was twinkling like crazy and I couldn't look away and it was the most visceral stargazing episode ever
>>525934269What's the biggest star you've seen?
I’m so sick of seeing stars bros. It happens a few times a day randomly. It looks just like that but much brighter. I hate stars so much it’s unreal
>>525934269it is starlink. fucking loads of those things criss crossing the sky these days. > some will be stationary for a 5 minutes than go 0. instant speed across the sky that im not buying
>>525934269There's so much trash in the sky now it's like a river in India. Sucks.
>>525935822based HR chart poster
>>525934269>there are things that exist >no I won’t post proof
>>525934269
>>525934269very few people look up at the sky, even fewer question things they see up there
>>525934927>>525935822>>525935892based and thunderboltspilled
>>525936960>it is starlink. fucking loads of those things criss crossing the sky these days.how fuckin retarded you have to be. if starlinks can reflect sunlight so easy why aren't we seeing planes at cruising altitude reflect sunlight? how come only starlink and iss reflect sunlight and none of the other 10,000+ things floating up there? go eat some more shit, jeet and stay out of converstations which are way over your IQ level
>>525936211>manipulating the sunthats impossible and beyond what humans can do. we are too low on the Kardashev scale.>A bunch of ionosphereic heaters (or high powered radar like pic rel) working in tandem can do a lot.its probably more related to the earths magnetic field and influencing that. seems more realistic.>>525936690I seen some weird stuff myself but a UFO doesnt mean ayyliums. could be anything and despite 15+ years of smartphones still no convincing ayylium sightings recorded. ayyliums are also getting mostly shilled by jews (see the Avi Loeb harvard jew that was hyping up that nothing burger comet as an ayylium spaceship).and now with AI no ayylium image/video proof can ever be fully trusted.
>>525936211Tesla earthquake machines?
>>525937441Zero point energy
>>525937309>starts talking about IQ>can't compute that satellites are higher than airplanes. >probably is a flat earther anywayi see you
>>525937309>none of the other 10,000+ things floating up there?oh, and you can see geostationaries if you try. you can see loads of fucking stuff including trash like spent boosters. try looking at a tracking app sometime
>>525937004Accepted astronomical theory describes how stars must "age" (run out of nuclear fuel) and slowly migrate, taking millions of years to do so, tracing meandering paths from one location on the HR diagram to another (the star going from one spectral class to another).The paths that these stars "must take" are, of course, completely predicated on the assumption that stars are fueled by the various stages of nuclear fusion of the lightest elements.The paths of stellar evolution are derived from what we presently know about nuclear fusion in its various stages.The Electric Star model does not make that assumption.In any event, humans have not been around long enough to actually observe any stars making the slow migrations from one place on the HR diagram to another that classical theory predicts.So, at present, slow "stellar evolution" is another one of those complicated theoretical constructs that jewish astrophysicists have devised without any observational evidence of its actual existence.There are, however, an increasing number of counterexamples, stars that have not evolved according to accepted theory.
>>525937802It's fine we can just nuke the space junk
>>525937247>>525937883>an increasing number of counterexamples, stars that have not evolved according to accepted theory.FG Sagittae has changed from blue to yellow since 1955 and quite recently it has taken a deep dive in luminosity.basically FG Sagittae is the central star of the planetary nebula He 1-5.It is a unique object in the sense that for this star we have direct evidence of stellar evolution but in a time scale comparable with the human lifetime!after abruptly brightening by four magnitudes, it has dropped seven magnitudes.From the end of the last century FG Sagittae has moved across the HR diagram (see pic here >>525935892 ) changing from a normal hot giant to a "late spectral type" (cool) star with marked changes in its surface chemical composition.Its present surface temperature is in the range of 4000K.This is not the kind of slow stellar "evolution" mainstream jew astrophysicists preach.
>>525937921trash collection business opportunity
>>525934269>how the fuck do people never look at the night sky anymoreWe live in town.Light pollution.I've seen alot of things moving around when the opportunity to watch was available.Consider why they don't want you looking at the firmament until approved, pre-scheduled events occur?
>>525938054FG Sagittae was long seemingly unique.Examination of old images and spectrograms reveal that V605 Aquilae, studied by Knut Lundmark in the 1920s was a similar sort of beast, though it is now very faint.Also V4334 Sagittarii, better known as Sakurais object.It too changed both spectral type and surface composition very rapidly and is now hydrogen poor andcarbon rich.
Eye-floaters and cataracts. You're older now.
>>525937883i get it. its just a best fit model for the current level of what people know, based on various assumptions. i dont buy the whole electric star thing but i dont care if it ends up being true. no problem. paradigm changes happen.
>>525938350Sungazing will fix those issues in a week or so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Gt-w38GeNchttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-astronomers-photograph-ufos-orbiting-earth-in-the-1950s/
>>525934269/threadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knVgYNO_0OM
>>525938580>the menzel gap
>>525938580The evidence for satellites before the space race based on old astronomical plates is really interesting stuff and pretty creepy to think about.
>>525938405>i dont buy the whole electric star thingyou probably didnt hear all the arguments and arent familiar with the mainstream model and the ES model.
>>525937309If you own binoculars you will see the other 10,000+ things up there, Your just a flerf retard.
>>525939271>, Your just a flerf retard.sure thing, jeet. why don't you show us with your binoculars, streetshitter
>>525938838>old astronomicalif you actually dig deeper into that rabbit hole you discover that the sky that the ancients described is nothing like what we see today.for example all kinds of ancient cultures all around the world talk about a time when there was no moon.
>>525939350Moon is a jewish psyop that's why Piccolo blew it up
>>525937333>More to do with directly affecting earth magnetic field Tell me more?Can we do this by injecting changed particle beams directly through the core at the poles?Does it have anything to do with the gamma ray beam expirements there?Was zapper anon right?
>>525939528I bet we use the hearters and radar beams for ionosphereic lensing at least
>>525939346Go buy one and do your own research.
>>525934269Just wait until you see one of these big fuckers.They are here and have been coming here for a very long time.
This you?
>>525940098You can make an optical cloak with interferening lasers and ionosphereic phase conjugation.So what that probably would be is just any arbitrarily shaped cloak field Hold on. I have the B&E video somewhere
>>525940098>>525940307
>>525940098You guys are bad at your jobs btw
>>525939528ever since they discovered the magnetic poleshift and the magnetic field weakening of the earth they started experimenting around, I guess to see if they can restore it or otherwise fix it or in any way control it to protect their assets from the sun.basically the poles are shifting and the magnetic field is weakening because the Sun is about to Nova in the next 2 decades or so (and because the earth has been slowly croaking ever since it changed orbits ca. 7k years ago).>Tell me more?there are dozens of projects that have to do with geoengineering, haarp, project satan etc.who knows how effective they are, so far it all looks like its all a waste of time and has yielded nothing of value.
>>525940467www.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DrhWBAFAGwzE
>>525940668I can't help but find this slightly intentionally demoralizing >20 years sorry palI bet we got longer and I question your premise. I praise the Sun!But the manipulation I'm sure that's real
>>525934269yeah it be sate lightsdem sate lights be moving chubba
>>525939902you're the one makin clams, shit eating jeet
>>525940947>20 years sorry palthe problem is that the earths magnetic field weakening is accelerating and thats not the only issue. a weak magnetic field means that even relatively weak CMEs from the Sun can cause a carrington event type of happening.a weak magnetic field also has an effect on the human body and mind.>I bet we got longerkinda unlikely>I praise the Sun!this has been tried already many times throughout history but it never yielded any results, turns out mutilating your cock or smearing shit on a phallus shaped rock to please a star doesnt actually mean anything to the plasma ball thats basically an electrical component in a giant universe sized circuit.
