[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1768302443558616m.jpg (63 KB, 1024x575)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
Why do zoomers spend so much time obsessing over how good looking other men are?
Seems pretty gay to me.
In the 90s if you had a handsome friend, no one would ever say anything about it, or maybe at most they would acknowledge that he was a good looking guy, but that was the end of it.
No one would ever consider quantitating shit the way these blackpill homos do.
>>
>>525947794
closeted homosexuality
>>
File: IMG_2237.jpg (60 KB, 851x1024)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>525947887
this is why I listen to destiny, he’s fucking BASED
>>
File: destiny.jpg (222 KB, 1126x1382)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
>>525947970

destiny ate sneakos brown semen out of his ex wifes loose pussy
>>
>>525947794
Zoomers are more self-aware

>In the 90s if you had a handsome friend, no one would ever say anything about it, or maybe at most they would acknowledge that he was a good looking guy,
You would be obsessed subconsciously
>>
>>525948174
>You would be obsessed subconsciously
only zoomers do this
>>
>>525947794
>No one would ever consider quantitating shit the way these blackpill homos do.
One day everything will be reduced to numbers. Because it's the only thing that gets results
>>
>>525947794
because being good looking is a literal super power.
>>
>>525948255
No, not really
>>
>>525948255
You are not self-aware enough to know what your subconscious mind thinks. It's not your fault however because you grew up in a smaller world. You didn't have access to so much knowledge like zoomers do through the internet today.
>>
>>525947794
That's the new mkultra
>>
>>525947794
zoomer woman are far worse for this shit
it's a result of living life through a screen. in the before times personality and charisma were what mattered. you couldn't be ugly and pull pussy but if you were cool and had a bad flordal tilt or whatever no one cared. meanwhile if you were a sperg with a good jawline no one cared.
>>
>>525947794
they're all faggots now
>>
File: th-3142234718.jpg (15 KB, 474x248)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>525948580
>in the before times personality and charisma were what mattered.
This
>>
>>525948407
>>525948409
in the past we'd just call you fags, but by all means keep obsessing over other men, that'll really benefit your life in the long run
>>
>>525947794
To be fair, some of you guys don't care enough. So then write a post how you can't get girls and did you look in the mirror?

I just think zoomers have all the information on their fingertips so they know everything to how to fix their problems but the argument is if everything they think is a problem IS like having a slightly not square jaw or long flowing hair.
>>
>>525947794

NOT POLITICS
>>
>>525948730
It will because you won't be forced to settle down with a fat wife you aren't physically attracted to.

Also most guys respect you more when you are tall and jacked.
>>
>>525948915
i'm sure you'll find a strong man that will make you his wife
>>
>>525948409
you are correct in some sense that zoomers are hyper-aware. but in past times, culture was permissive of men looking like shit and in fact caring about appearance too much was seen as effeminate

nowadays everything is dictated by social media, so men get no reinforcement from anywhere telling them to stop worrying about external appearances. it must be painful to be a hyper-aware zoomer but there's no background culture telling you to not give a shit, you are told to give a shit all the time about everything all at once
>>
>>525948965
See even you think like that subconsciously. You attempt at an insult is a homosexual fantasy of the other guy being taken by a bigger, stronger man. But as I said, you are not self-aware.
>>
>>525949054
it's sort of a fucked up cycle
the women are the ones who are actually brain broken by looks and social media shit and they pass it on to the men
then the men pass it on to the women and so on
>>
>>525949548
Think like what? That being gay is for faggots? Yes I do think that, you fucking weird zoomer pseudo psychologist
>>
>>525949054
>so men get no reinforcement from anywhere telling them to stop worrying about external appearances
No there's a lot of that on social media. It's called the redpill or whatever. But most people realize it's a coping mechanism and it doesn't work.
>>
>>525947794
because thats the only way to compete after women standards ruined dating
>>
They are effeminate
>>
Sex symbols have always existed. We're just well into the age of always online dystopia now, so instead of proper celebs you get kooky social media freaks like that planet of the apes thing in your picture.
>>
File: 4qys6vzcnzmd1.jpg (78 KB, 1892x1214)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>525949732
>t.
>>
>>525949054
>but in past times, culture was permissive of men looking like shit and in fact caring about appearance too much was seen as effeminate
That's the opposite of truth, though. Relaxation of etiquette rules is historically a very recent post-war trend. Just 70 years ago you'd be reprimanded by most fellow men for not wearing a hat outdoors. And if you go a little further back to 18th century and beyond, you'll see men were absolutely expected to look as pampered and pretty as possible.
>>
>>525951650
>you'll see men were absolutely expected to look as pampered and pretty as possible.

That wasn't an expectation so much as a flex

The more gay and frilly you could present yourself, the less actual work, and thus more wealthy you were

It's the same thing as long nails on women. It meant she wasn't responsible for her own labor.
>>
>>525947794
their brains are so destroyed by porn that they aren't interested in women, just cock comparing with other men
>>
>>525947794
Sad and gay behavior but I cannot find it in my heart to blame them since they cope however they can. I still have high hopes for them
>>
>>525947794
>quantitating
You should try IQmaxxing
>>
>>525952125
>That wasn't an expectation so much as a flex
No, it was not a "flex", my ebonics-brained friend. It's called social norms and rules of decorum.
>The more gay and frilly you could present yourself, the less actual work, and thus more wealthy you were
That does not mean that working class and petty bourgeoisie men strolled around in hairshirts and burlap pants. Even medieval peasants had fairly complex fashion that was nothing like what hollyjew would have you believe.
>>
>>525951650
I'm not talking about the 1700's, and not even the 1940's. I mean the 1980's-2000's had a very relaxed attitude towards male appearance. 90's grunge and punk culture especially encouraged looking like shit, you could call it urban decay but in some ways it was good for men's mental health.

It's certainly preferable to young men being obsessed with nasal circumferences and forehead bridges or whatever the fuck, using makeup, comparing each other's height, getting plastic surgery, etc.
>>
>>525947794
because it determines whether you get girls and how much money you make, and how people treat you.

even more than any other time. guys used to tell each other to hit the gym and lift weights. but that is jut cope and all that matters now is your height and looks
>>
>>525947794
I'd hate to be the guy on the left.
Spend all my time looking pretty just to look like an ugly fag.
The ugly fag on the right just embraces his ugliness.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.