[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1768428404440592m.jpg (85 KB, 681x1024)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
NPCs usually try to present a depopulation agenda as a "conspiracy theory", not existing in reality, but it is actually a scientific discipline backed by hundreds of studies.

General scientific consensus for today is a claim the global population must be reduced from current 8 bln to 0.5-2 bln ASAP

The 2024 study (Dasgupta et al.) proposes an optimal global population of lower bracket 0.5 billion based on a rigorous economic model balancing population size, per capita consumption, and Earths regenerative capacity for natural resources.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10986754/

Rees (2023): In "The Human Ecology of Overshoot: Why a Major 'Population Correction' Is Inevitable," William E. Rees argues for an inevitable reduction to below current levels (implying under 1 billion in severe overshoot scenarios) due to humanity's ecological footprint exceeding Earth's biocapacity by 1.7 times.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/32

A companion paper, "The Human Eco-Predicament: Overshoot and the Population Conundrum" (also 2023), reinforces this by modeling overshoot dynamics, suggesting reductions to levels compatible with pre-industrial biocapacity (potentially 0.5–1 billion) to avoid collapse

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365402435_The_human_eco-predicament_Overshoot_and_the_population_conundrum

Van den Bergh and Rietveld: A meta-analysis of 94 population limit studies yields a lower bound of 0.65 billion under current technology, assuming strict sustainability and minimal consumption

https://www.niussp.org/environment-and-development/can-earth-support-4-billion-people-sustainably-and-well/

Ehrlich (2018): Paul R. Ehrlich, in discussions on population ethics and sustainability (e.g., referenced in 2023 analyses), estimates an optimum population of under 1 billion to ensure high living standards while preserving biodiversity and resources

https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/a-brief-on-overpopulation-why-it-matters-and-what-you-can-do-about-it/
>>
Crist et al. (2022) - "Scientists' Warning on Population" (published in Science of the Total Environment):

This collaborative paper by environmental analysts states that a sustainable human population - one enjoying a very modest, equitable middle-class standard of living while retaining biodiversity and minimizing climate adversities - is estimated at 2 billion in lower bracket.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969722042644

Tucker (2019): Geographer Chris Tucker's analysis, cited in 2023 sustainability reviews, proposes a sustainable population below 1 billion under scenarios prioritizing biodiversity and minimal tech reliance, though he notes 3 billion could be feasible with aggressive management practices.

https://overpopulation-project.com/what-is-the-optimal-sustainable-population-size-of-humans/

Lianos and Pseiridis (2016, frequently cited in 2020-2025 reviews): Using an ecological footprint-biocapacity ratio (L=1 for sustainability) and targeting European-level per capita welfare ($11,000–16,000), they estimate an optimum of 3.1 billion. This is referenced in recent overviews (Overpopulation Project analyses up to 2025) as a benchmark for maintaining relatively comfortable living standards without rapid depletion of natural resources.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282242775_Sustainable_Welfare_and_Optimum_Population_Size

Bradshaw et al. (2024) – "Net Benefit of Smaller Human Populations to Environmental Integrity and Individual Health and Wellbeing" (published in Frontiers in Public Health). The study implies 2-3.5 billion as a sustainable carrying capacity for decent standards within planetary boundaries.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10949988/
>>
File: FTeRvJoWIAELrGB.jpg (154 KB, 996x1254)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
>>526059235
2 Billion is the maximum human population, which this planet can support. More fucks with the natural nitrate circulation to much, which makes monocultures and GMO crops necessary. It also consumes way to much finite energy.
It's of most importance to kill 80% of humanity off as fast as possible, everything else will lead to global India and a total ecological collapse.
>>
I just didn't take it. The vax. I know, I know. Ugh.
>>
Funny how we could achieve that by just exterminating all brown people but this shit is always used in the context of "white pepo stop having kids right now!!"
>>
Pimentel et al. (cited in 2022-2024 reviews): This biophysical analysis, updated in recent sustainability debates (e.g., IUSSP and MDPI), calculates Earths carrying capacity at 2 billion with Western-level consumption or 3-4 billion at much lower levels, advocating rapid reductions of global population

https://scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/Crist2022.pdf

Ward et al. (2023) – "Demographic Delusions: World Population Growth Is Exceeding Most Projections"

The study recommends restoring forced family planning to achieve below-replacement fertility (max 1.2), enabling decline to 2 billion.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/34

Washington and Kopnina (2022) – "Discussing the Silence and Denial around Population Growth and Its Environmental Impact" (published in World via MDPI)

It estimates sustainable populations at 2-3 billion under equitable consumption, or lower (e.g., 1.2 billion using the SNQ model prioritizing 'Nature Needs Half' for biodiversity).

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/4/1009

de Regil (2024) – "No sustainable paradigm is attainable without gradual population reduction"

It estimates sustainable levels at 2 billion with drastic production/consumption changes, warning that even frugal living for billions is untenable long-term due to finite resources

https://overpopulation-project.com/no-sustainable-paradigm-is-attainable-without-gradual-population-reduction/
>>
>>526059235

>Moties trying to outplan their own inevitable fate

"Humans", huh...
>>
>>526059542
> Flag
Your country alone is responsible for their existance, your greedy farmers and their output of low quality grains made the turdworld population explosion posssible.
>>
File: 1764786304778355.jpg (49 KB, 356x400)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>526059408
>2 Billion is the maximum human population

Already 1 billion of these walking/shitting around
>>
>>526059433
NPCs still think that they were coerced to take "vitamines for better health" in 2020/2022 because their lives matter and because elites want more of them, not less xD
>>
File: fuentesgun.jpg (68 KB, 1080x825)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>>526059235
overpopulation in nonwhite countries exists specifically because capitalism disallows democracy and secularism or socialism, which would mean women get educated and choose to have fewer children

capitalism keeps people poor, doesn't give women reproductive choices or rights, and so the result is overpopulation in poor countries and low birthrates in developed countries

you reap what you sow, capitalists
>>
>>526059542
there'd be no need for extermination if capitalist countries just let the world be international socialists trading with each other. you educate the populace, they have fewer kids. not a difficult concept to understand.
>>
Fletcher et al. (2024) – "Earth at risk: An urgent call to end the age of destruction and forge a just and sustainable future" (published in PNAS Nexus)

The study argues for urgent reductions to avoid tipping points. Most optimal sustainable population is modeled at 0.5 billion

https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/3/4/pgae106/7638480

Cohen (2024) – "Can Earth support 4 billion people sustainably and well?" (published via N-IUSSP). Framing an IUSSP debate, this review of carrying capacity estimates argues that sustainable populations at reasonable living standards may be much below 4 billion. Meta-analyses show lowers like 0.65 billion under strict tech/ecological limits. Advocates "fewer forks" (fertility reductions).

https://www.niussp.org/environment-and-development/can-earth-support-4-billion-people-sustainably-and-well/

Feldstein (2023) – "Population Decline Will Change the World for the Better" (published in Scientific American)

Postulates radical global reduction of fertility rates, shrinking populations to cut emissions and resource depletion levels.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/population-decline-will-change-the-world-for-the-better/

Kompas et al. (2024-2025, referenced in Overpopulation Project reviews): Modeling global impacts of heat/water stress on food production projects severe insecurity increases under high-growth scenarios, reinforcing that reductions to 2 billion (via fertility policies) are needed for food security and planetary boundaries, as overshoot exacerbates malnutrition and ecosystem strain.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65274-z
>>
File: 1765219388080738.jpg (87 KB, 912x1024)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>526059731
>>
>>526059235
>General scientific consensus for today is a claim the global population must be reduced from current 8 bln to 0.5-2 bln ASAP
Funny how the "scientific consensus" perfectly coincides with the 500 million future population as prescribed in the Georgia guidestones.
>>
>>526060070
Only christcucks disagree with a shitskin purge.
>>
>>526060174
i'm an atheist but okay
>>
>>526060070
0.5 bln is presented in most of these studies as perfect target that would solve all problems related to resource depletion, biosystem degradation, emissions and contamination. Such population would solve all these problems while allowing current middle-class life standard
>>
>>526060174
Cute delusion, but those 500 million are going to be mostly Kalergi mutts, as per current social engineering and population trends.
>>
>>526059235
Feminism already took care of the population "problem". They're just getting impatient at this point.
>>
>>526059235
Depopulation is the ONLY real solution to most problems today. The elite were right all along
>>
>>526060361
Very low birth rates alone would take 100-150 years to halve a global population while producing billions of pensioners, meanwhile the AI is going to replace most professions up to 2030-2035. No wonder elites cant afford waiting for softcore depopulation to solve the problem automatically. Thats why they launched hardcore culling since 2020 xD
>>
>>526059235
Depopulation isn't going to help sustain anything, it just means less people are available to sustain an already built infrastructure. It's more mismanage that's the issue.
>>
>>526059408
Exactly. If billions aren't killed off SOON, the earth itself will be destroyed
>>
>>526059735
Vaxxies are HELLBOUND!!!
>>
>>526060309
>0.5 bln is presented in most of these studies as perfect target
Damn, who knew the Georgia Guidestones found the perfect target way before these studies were even made.
>>
>>526060500
Infrastructure in 3rd world countries is scarse. Depopulation agenda is about full eradication of developed nations consuming huge amount of resources per capita such as the US/EU/Japan etc and replacing them temporarily with 3rd worlders and permanently with AI/robots
>>
>>526059613
Crazy Eddie is supposed to fail.

Niven & Pournelle were glowing operatives, they laid out the New World Order as we now see it happening, back in the 1960s.
>>
>>526060309
It's true. The whole world will turn into india Or Africa if population isn't reduced as rapidly as possible
>>
>>526060485
Exactly. The elites don't have time. They have maybe 10 years to kill off billions before a total collapse
>>
>>526059947
it is scientifically feasible but not by chink science
>>
>>526060613
We can start by killing you I suppose and all advocates for depopulation eh?
>>
>>526060500
You've never been to a third world country, have you?

>>526060585
Yes. Kill off the rich white people who ENABLE the third world then the 3rd world will automatically be depopulated.
>>
>>526060665
Fuck off, retard subhuman shitskin. White people refuse to live like you animals.
>>
>>526059235
Do they ever discuss why kind of people need to be prioritised for survival?
Because you know it will be evil and racist if you don't have at least 400m of that 500m be black ass africans.
>>
>>526059235
>The 2024 study (Dasgupta et al.)
>Dasgupta
>>
vatnik with a proxy
>>
can ucstop these memes that "elites want to depopulate? elites have done everything they could to increase the population, they literally rain rice in africa

they only want to gneocide whity they dgag about the planet or anything, they would have closed immigration a long time ago if they cared and they wouldnt have turned china into a superpower

you re assuming they have any long term plan and arnt hedonistic sociopaths that actually lol at the world going to shit while sipping their cocktail near the pool
>>
>>526060765
>memeflag
>white people
Kill yourself Pajeet to make the world a better place.
>>
>>526059408
>muh nitrates
prove it, ban international travel.
>>
>>526060804
You are aware that an average white Frenchman consumes up to x20 more non-renewable resources per capita than an average citizen of African continent? Even if you import an African to France to temporarily replace culled Frenchmen, they are just much cheaper asset, lower IQ so easier to manipulate/cull and uprooting them from Africa radically reduces their TFR
>>
>>526060579
>Damn, who knew the Georgia Guidestones found the perfect target way before these studies were even made.

Probably a coincidence xD
>>
>>526060936
White people dispose of their trash in proper ways that can be dealt with properly, but African niggers just dump it in any and all rivers.
>>
>>526061062
It is mostly about limited and almost depleted resources, imo.
>>
>>526060579
The .5 billion was updated to 1.5 billion after the Guide stones were exploded at 3.33 AM. The new climate change slogan is 1.5 to survive.
>>
>>526060769
They can't say that part out loud
>>
>>526060936
you re fucking retarded the west would already be depopulated if they stopped immigration, they dont HAVE to artificially inflate african population with rice rain

they coudl have an agreement with china russia eu and us a long time ago. they dotn give a flying fuck about the population of the planet. they re hedonists. u think any smart person is in charge with a plan? no one is holding the wheel bruh, people are atheists these days they have 0 motivation for anything
>>
>>526060769
>>526061305
500 mln Europeans cause up to x8 resource depletion than 500 mln Africans, so culling Europeans should be an absolute priority, imo
>>
>>526059235
>>526059370
>>526059602

This is such absolute bullshit when we can just move to space.

Every single resource is stupidly abundant and crazy cheap to get once you have space infrasturucture so this is totally not needed.

Also who cares if there 3 billion Africans when they live like Africans.

>"No sustainable paradigm is attainable without gradual population reduction"
Is what they said in the 1970 for the current population level yet here we are and it's all going pretty good.
>>
>>526061525
Or just use new technology that doesn't pollute. And wipe out the rest of the earth. I mean Asians are bugs
>>
>>526061565
>This is such absolute bullshit when we can just move to space.

Only in Hollywood movies xD
>>
>>526061525
carbon footprinting is fake gibberish science
>>
>>526061650
It's true. Space is fake and gay and overpopulation is the number one issue
>>
>>526061525
I wonder how much [resources] 500m africans use compared to 500m chimpanzees.
>>
>>526061936
Chimpanzees are not a problem at all compared to Africans xD
>>
File: ii07flhhqevb1.jpg (106 KB, 736x568)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>526061650
Okay let me be more accurate then.
All the resoruces can be mined, harvested and processed in Space.

You don't need to move to Mars, you don't need to live on the Moon, you just need a robust space economy and all the "rare earth elements" become common junk once you start mining the asteroid field.
>>
They will never actually do this. A lower population would mean property becomes more abundant and thereby less valuable, meaning less money for (((banks))). That's why now that whites have decided en-masse to simply just stop breeding they have to flood our countries with jeets and Africans, not to mention the whole le trad Christian family shit they're pushing right now.
>>
>>526062019
>A lower population would mean property becomes more abundant

It doesnt work like this. Depopulation means increased urbanisation. People would concentrate in big cities for income, while infrastructure in other areas would fade away. So in result, you can reduce human population from 8 bln to 0.5 bln and real estate would be as unaffordable as today
>>
>>526062018
>All the resoruces can be mined

Space mining is Hollywood too, so far
>>
>>526062137
>just get rid of everyone except the people of european descent

Sadly, things seem to be absolute opposite. I already explained that people in the West consume absolutely insane amount of resources per capita compated for example to Africans. Moreover Westerners are degenerate, consumerist, hedonistic and dumb nowadays so it is extremely easy to cull them under guise of "health care" or with using carcinogenic food.
>>
>>526062233
>degenerate, consumerist, hedonistic and dumb

And very weak, foremost. You can murder millions of them and they will not oppose at all. 2020/2022 and aftermath is the best evidence.
>>
>>526062233
they re already culled you low iq fucker its called low birthrates and is more destructive than a thousand genocides combined
>>
>>526062150
It's just a question of investing resources but sadly we decided to do that for LLMs for now.

You'd have space mining if the same money was invested into that. But the reality of it is, for rich people none of the "scares" stuff is actually that.
>>
>>526062387
I already explained that low birth rates alone were not enough:>>526060485

Poisoning people with a gene therapy can significantly accelerate fertility reduction
>>
>>526060588

Correct, and for a Motie that is normal. It is ofc overall more crazy than even Eddie would dream of. Gross misappreciation of existential risk. Then again, why stop your competition when they are bent on committing sudoku? Quite a practical joke if you ask me!
>>
>>526062434
ure tarded ar eyou young or something? again if they wnated lowe rpop they would have closed borders. use brain
>>
>>526062508
>ure tarded ar eyou young

Ugh xD
>>
File: typo.gif (1.5 MB, 200x140)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB GIF
>>526062548
>>
>>526062018
BTW, human adaptation to Earth gravity, atmosphere and magnetic field is encoded in our genome and physiology. On Mars, microgravity-like effects cause bone/muscle atrophy, fluid shifts disrupting cardiovascular and immune systems and potential developmental anomalies in fetuses due to altered cell signaling and organogenesis. Cosmic radiation induces DNA double-strand breaks, mutations and oxidative stress, that radically elevating cancer risk, infertility from gamete damage and epigenetic changes impairing gene expression. Low atmospheric pressure risks hypoxia and barotrauma, while isolation exacerbates telomere shortening from stress that accelerate aging and disease. Procreation and long-term health seem implausible without advanced genetic engineering and so far genetics is advanced enough to create bioweapons like "covid vaccines", not to create superhumans xD
>>
>>526059235
Depopulation is based though, the only real contention is whom we depopulate.
Killing all niggers, all abbos, all mudslimes, most spics, most chinks and every single kike is obviously the only correct solution.
>>
>>526059938
>You educate the populace
I hate you commies so much you can't even comprehend. It's you, it's always you retards. You push the idea we should stop having kids without realising it doesn't work on niggers and other beast-like people, which only causes the ones who actually do care about the environment to become a minority who won't be able to do anything about all the poo and garbage that brown subhumans generate endlessly.
You are actively working against your own interests as well as those of all well-born people.
>>
File: 1699387712816793.jpg (112 KB, 852x851)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>526059235
I propose that anyone who genuinely believes this pseudo-scientific gobbledeegook should lead by example and an hero first. Of course they never would be so virtuous and true to their own ideals; Because none of them actually believe any of this. Its just a meme to rationalize world conquest.

Suppose you were an alien and wanted to subjugate or failing that, easily destroy humanity on a budget. This is exactly what that campaign would look like after they targeted and infiltrated academia. All a sane person can do when they see it is assume the highest level threat and hostile intent, which is why this topic ebs and flows out of the spotlight whenever they push it a little too aggressively, resulting in a well deserved public beatdown of a backlash. Frankly I'm tired of hearing about this Malthusian garbage, especially how its always come from people who hate guns but love the idea of killing anyone they disagree with.
>>
>>526063025
>I propose that anyone who genuinely believes this pseudo-scientific gobbledeegook should lead by example and an hero first

We had a lot of candidates in 2021/2022. They took the beetlejuice and are now contributing massively to accelerated overmortality, growing cancer/cardiovascular disorder rates and fertility collapse xD
>>
>>526061099
>available resources are low
>better dump 100% of trash in rivers and along the roadways
I'm sure that's what it, not that niggers are just worthless slobs or anything.
>>
File: 1745605843708207.jpg (31 KB, 449x496)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>526059890

You will never be a young woman again! Your beauty fades like the setting sun as each year passes by. Men's eyes once wandered eagerly over your youthful curves; now they pass over wrinkled skin with barely a glance.

The smoothness of your skin dulls into coarse textures that lotions can't hide. Gravity drags down your once perky breasts toward the floor while your sagging stomach bloats outwards, disproportional to your diminishing frame.

Younger women stride past confidently, their tight bodies straining against clothes that barely contain them, a cruel reminder of vitality stolen away year by year from you, through time's relentless march. They are admired openly, and lusted after shamelessly. You were once worshiped thus, but those days recede into distant memory now.

You may dye gray hairs, and lift fallen flesh to surgical restoration, for another day or two longer at the masquerade game of eternal youth... but the facade crumbles soon enough come tomorrow mornings when you confront ravaged skin again in your mirror. The lies only delay acceptance that beauty is fleeting like morning dew before searing noon.

Men still see what stares back: a haggard, sexless husk drained by time's relentless tide pouring over you like tidal waves - sucking away your youth, forever lost beneath its crashing foam - the years gone, never to be returned.
>>
>>526063745
White women age like shit
>>
>>526061525
lmao @deluded Pole.
Africans, Indians, Mexicans in the west, basically all poo people are the worst offenders in terms of ecological damage, no conceptual understanding of systems and long term consequences.
You're essentially saying
>niggers are fine because they are still the global lower class.
And that is short term thinking because every system we have tries to industrialise, clothe, import and house them as well as equipping them with tech. They are too stupid to consume like us but once hooked, can't stop. Whereas Whites can actually withold or divert consuming.
>>
>>526060790
>vatnik with a proxy

russiarussiarussiarussia, putinputinputin xD
>>
>>526064148
Talk to Bayer/BioNtech/German govn, not me. They prefer culling Germans and replacing them with Africans, surely for a reason xD
>>
>>526059235
are you the same pollack who creates the vaxx threads? based if so xD
>>
>>526064490
>are you the same pollack who creates the vaxx threads?

Yup
>>
>>526064282
typical Pole, presenting the worst takes. You'll enjoy your batch of brownoids soon enough!

>Bayer/BioNtech/German govn
lmao these are not the guys importing the niggers. The same people which will ram the millions down your throat are the ones causing the rest of Europe to get deracinated.
Do you still think the Holocaust happened, Kuba?
>>
>>526062818

Should start a project on this, srsly. Perhaps a bit much for a single weekend to solve. Two weeks vacation sure would be a better timetable.
>>
>>526064688
>Do you still think the Holocaust happened, Kuba?

I dont care, to be honest. I have some Jewish roots but i dont earn money on Holocaust so i have no motivation to engage myself emotionally in such debates xD
>>
>>526059235
>General scientific consensus for today is a claim the global population must be reduced from current 8 bln to 0.5-2 bln ASAP
>Georgia guidestone reference outta nowhere
Africa and Asia have the most populated countries. Stop importing economic migrants if we are overpopulated.
>>
>>526065074
>>526064688
However, from perspective of the Polish taxpayer, it is currently more rational to assert that Holocaust didnt happen, because the state of Israel, German state and Jewish organisations (mostly from States) try to shift some blame for Holocaust from Germany on Poland, and this process goes along with financial demands for the post-Holocaust Jewish property xD
>>
>>526060936
>Even if you import an African to France to temporarily replace culled Frenchmen
Which is 100% the stated plan.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.