Truman and Johnson lost their respective wars because they tried to fight them in a conventional manner, which failed because those countries fought assymetrically. If Trump was president back in those days he would have won those wars, and he would have done so with minimal blood loss. His recent victory over Venezuela shows the true Genius of Trump.Instead of fighting a conventional war like a retard, what you do instead is send in the Navy Seals to abduct the leaders of the opposing side. Once you have them in chains then you can impose any condition on those countries you want. Why send hundreds of thousands of soldiers to fight the old fashion way when a small team of elite troops can just kidnap Ho Chi Minh or Kim Il Sung or whomever and have it over in done in just a matter of hours instead of dragging it out for years or decades and then end up losing. Truman and Johnson were retarded. Trump is a true genius who has come up with a better way.Sun Tzu's The Art of War and all other books on the topic of warfare became obsolete because of Trump. He completely revolutionized everything with his capture of Maduro. Military scholars will be studying what Trump did for many centuries to come.
Trump was a draft dodger during the Vietnam war
>>526064846>assymentrically
>>526064846>His recent victory over Venezuela shows the true Genius of Trump.>He completely revolutionized everything with his capture of Maduro.OP is in fantasy land. Maduro was not percieved by his people the way Ho Chi Min was because it was Ho Chi Min who lead the Vietnamese to victory over the French colonialists. That's was caused the subdivision of North & South Vietnam. There won't be followers of the buddha setting themselves on fire in caraccas anytime soon. The idea that Trump could have just bribed the North Vietnamese and choppered in Delta force they way he did in Venezuela is laughable, delusional.
>>526065373>Trump was a draft dodger during the Vietnam warThis logical fallacy doesn't invalidate anything I said.>>526065626I did make a typo by putting two s's instead of just one, but there was no "n" when I spelled it. In any case, pointing out typos and ignoring the argument is another logical fallacy.
