I voted for Trump and now multi-generational Americans whose families were here before 1776 are dealing with federal agents harassing them just because they look a little swarthy.
>>526068538And?
>>526068705I'm just posting facts. It is up to you and your heart to form an opinion about it.
>>526068538None of that is true But I'll give you a history lesson. Theres nobody left from pre-1776. Tje cutrent "founding stock" are Anglo-Germanics who arrived starting in early 1800s. My family e.g. came via NY to VA then TX starting in 1814. Others of my ancestors arrived post civil war in the 1870s, 1880s. Some of my people came from Alsace in 1880s.You just need to learn a bit more so you can talk intelligently on the subject
>>526068779Then why the fuck are you posting at all?
>>526068814Did they just vanish after you conducted a bullshit magic trick? No. They continued to breed, and descendants of pilgrims bred with the soldiers of Spain who assisted the United States in overcoming King George III.
>>526068856To inform my public which is /pol/.
>>526068779It sounds to me like you're against federal agents harassing swarthy looking people. Is this true or not?
>>526068538>multi-generational Americans whose families were here before 1776 are dealing with federal agents harassing Where?
>>526069035For me, it depends on multiple factors. It depends whether or not they're an American citizen first and foremost. It also depends if they speak English. It also depends on their intellectual capabilities, productivity, and overall behavior. I'm not for the approach that this administration is pursuing. That said, a country needs to have borders. Additionally, if you can't speak English or you're a criminal who got picked up, you should go.
>>526069085Ironically, the places they're targeting. The real problem is in the Southwest states. The more northern and midwest states have Spanish families who've fought in every war this country ever gotten into.
>>526069218ICE has a pretty big budget but still can't afford psychic agents. The way you couch everything you say in qualifiers makes you sound like a fag.
>>526069347No. You just lost your humanity. I've always operated on par with it.
>>526068984You’re informing /pol/ that ICE exists?Did you need to die like yesterday. Die nigger DIE
>>526069321And the problem is? If you're a legal citizen you have absolutely nothing to be worried about
>>526069431No. I'm informing /pol/ of what is going on, specifically to the anons who don't really leave the house.
>>526068538> I voted for Trump - no, you didn’t.>now multi-generational Americans whose families were here before 1776 are dealing with federal agents harassing them just because they look a little swarthy.This never happened, ever.
>>526069461I am of the opinion that the government shouldn't be allowed to used armed masked men to aggressively check a citizen, stuff him into a van, run some Palantir facial recognition software on him before saying say "you're all good, bud" and then dropping him off five miles away from where they cuffed him up at.
>>526068856>getting this rustled over a simple statement of fact because you know that many people find the condition unacceptable
>>526069524>- no, you didn’t.I did.>This never happened, ever.It has. Many times already.
>>526068538Although OP sounds like a huge fag, I agree that masked agents having free rein to harass citizens as they please is fucking bonkers. The 2A fags really showing how full of shit they are about needing guns to prevent a tyrannical government. The tyrannical government is forming in front of our eyes. shortsighted faggots are clapping like seals at libs getting the boot without realizing that they are watching the Overton window shift and that the boot will get turned on them in the future. Federal agents acting with impunity should be appalling to any real patriot.
>>526069461This. And with the exact same justification, all of our communications and consumption of media of any kind should be monitored and assessed by a federal agency
>>526069740I'm not a huge fag, but you're a good man.
>>526069689>No it didn't >Yes it did>No it didn't>Yes it did
>>526069741It already is, and doing things like making terroristic threats is already illegal >>526069627Yeah except none of the libtards complaining like this gave a shit when far worse was happening during covid. They were cheering for the tyranny then.The difference between then and now, is there was no legal basis to shut down society/businesses; they just did it. What you're seeing now is the enforcement of laws that have been on the books for 100 years. Apparently the tyranny of psychotic women running society is preferable to any kind of law enforcement.
>>526068538>I voted for TrumpSure you did, Kaden.
>>526069882I just don't want any form of tyranny. I was under the false assumption that the right also felt this way.
>>526068814My family came over in the 1650’s…
>>526069978I dont view the enforcement of laws as a result of voting for a candidate i put into office to enforce said laws to be tyrannical
>>526069882You're saying that every piece of media consumption is both monitored, accurately tied to an individual, and assessed for legality (not just terrorism, but piracy, pedoshit, harassment, etc)? There just happens to be a .002% enforcement rate on this stuff?
>>526069882bullshit pro-tyranny arguments
>>526070107The methods are tyrannical. You're just okay with tyranny. You should at least have the balls to say that. Say you're okay with tyranny if it achieves some of the very narrow political objectives that you personally have.
>>526070107>admitting that you dont think the constitution matters as long as its disregarded by people you likeLmao pls be false flag
>>526070246I dont view the enforcement of laws against a segment of the population that isnt entitled to rights to be tyranny. Criminals and illegal aliens should be oppressed. If American citizens end up mistreated or have their rights violated, they can and should seek restitution through the legal process.
>>526069035YUMMY! COP BOOTS! Don't you got a war to go die in for Israel?>>526068856Because you suck Jew dick and his comment made you seethe, non-white.
>>526070285Yeah, I dont think the constitution should apply to criminals or aliens.
>>526070405>different IDor anyone ever suspected (or claimed to be suspected) of such by corruptible, fallible federal agencies.
>>526070361>If American citizens end up mistreated or have their rights violated, they can and should seek restitution through the legal process.What they'll get instead is this administration doing everything to discredit them, as well as unleashing its cult members against them.
>>526068538one drop rule reigns supreme. swarthy niggerbeast mutts get the rope.
>>526070091Same, I had family that were part of the original settlement at Roanoke island.
>>526070552Sorry, im on mobile so my id will keep changing. But yes, law enforcement will always produce errors. A system of any size will have errors, but thats why we have legal processes for those people to seek restitution against the government when their rights are violated. In this case, the targets of the enforcement action arent entitled to those same rights. Their 'due process' is being deported. >>526070645Nobody wants to see law abiding American citizens be mistreated, but its a pretty small ask to just provide proof of citizenship and go about your business. As a citizen you arent being asked to do anything that violates your rights when it comes to ICE, and if you are you have legal grounds to seek restitution for that. The time to fight law enforcement isnt when you are being detained; that is beyond retarded and simply leads to darwinism. You should seek legal and political solutions if you dont like how law enforcement is acting, because they have the lawful authority to just kill you if you put their life in danger.
>>526070924Contrast the ability to seek legal recourse with the doj denying state investigation into Good and the recently unprecedented resignations of Minneapolis prosecutors.
>>526071338This.
>>526071338Thats for state and federal lawyers to determine the legality of. The legal process will play out even if it goes to the Supreme Court.
>>526070924No, you are misunderstanding. Its not about predictable errors at scale, its about you excusing them when presented with them. You're pretending that violations are fine as long as there's restitution, and you're also naive if you think the restitution process is going to work just fine in practical application. Don't know if you're a zoomer or someone who actually lived through the Iraq war error and is just too dumb to see the numerous parallels
>>526072822The president was already commenting to the press on it upon his first view. You're incredibly naive if you think that whole process would run fairly
