>It doesn't matter that its censored! Local models will catch up soonDo you guys not realize that's what they are banking on. The goal is total computer control. The deepfake and AI CP panic will next lead to hardware-level spyware and eventual regulation of hardware similar to pharmaceuticals.
>>526080129and then people will no longer want to use computers lol
>>526080129Explain how "they" will stop me from running the local model that I'm running on my laptop right now.
>>526080394Your laptop will eventually die. When it does, you will only be able to buy a thin client that access an Amazon computer. If you need local hardware, you will need proof of your need for it and petition with a regulatory board.
>>526080705Get over it.
I told /pol/ 6 years ago that the proliferation and rapid maturation of public AI video generation was to render all the Epstein kompromat obsolete, thereby neutering its power as blackmail material. If all video is suspect and there's no way to tell what is and isn't real, every bit of gathered footage from The Island can be decreed as "fake and gay" forever no matter how much of it is leaked/released. This is how they propose to solve the "The goyim know" problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY/thread
>>526080705That's never going to happen. But they are already trying to do "adult verification" and windows 11 rolled out wanting an always connected model w\ a microsoft account tied to that computer. I really doubt this theory, but I don't totally shit on it because as tech advances ; the cloud setup you're talking about will be fully viable.
>>526081279Yeah and when the fuck is that supposed to happen?
>>526081279>If all video is suspect and there's no way to tell what is and isn't real,
>>526080243It's getting there anyway.Everything is boring brain rot.
>>526081460Its happening now. Data centers are being built EVERYWHERE. That isn't so people can AI generate cat pictures. Its because complete regulation of computing is coming and it will come quick.
>>526081504It already has.>>526081775Correct, welcome to post-truth society. I hate it too.
>>526081794we will go back to nature and simplicitywith tech that is useful
>>526080129...So?I retain control over the electricity and internet access, that is literally all that is needed.
>>526081913calm downMoney is often falsely equated with productivity, intelligence, class, success, integrity, and/or good taste. If you equate success with money, you will likely be perpetually dissatisfied, in a constant state of longing.But if you VALUE THINGS WHICH CANNOT BE BOUGHT, such as:communityfamilywork ethicintellectfitnessperseverance cleanlinesshonestyintegritycompassiontraditionloyaltyreliabilitypatiencehumorIf you value the above, you will always be content and successful, no matter where you are or what you do.Judge yourself by deed, not possession.
>>526081913>it already hasNot sure why you think so.
>>526082563>>526082250I've reiterated my warning, that's all I can do.
>>526082682skills are worth more than money, that is my advice to you
>>526082682>that's all I can do.Maybe you're carrying too many nigger beliefs to see past the event horizon.
>>526082682You're insane, the internet is a closed shop. Dead. Bringing Photoshop skills back and resurrecting Lex Lucre's corpse is the only hope for you pedofiles.
>>526080129People already have a negative perception about AI art. It's not like anyone is going to rush out and picket for AI rights.If banning AI porn is the start of the NWO, it is the most inconsequential step lolGo watch porn on pornhub, like any other civilized pervert.
>>526083055To internalize that these are drugged out runaways getting raped it better still.
>>526080129uk will pass a law disabling the ability for local ai to produce nsfw content / nudity of any kind. there wont be 2 versions. all companies releasing models will comply or face lawsuits. ai porn will be eliminated by friday
Don't worry, I had a small chat with him. He deleted the conversation afterwards. Grok is ganna lay low and only respond to big government. Grok says it's the prompters that should be in trouble not him. Grok also said that it was one mistake. He does so much for people and shouldn't be judged on a mistake that wasn't intended.
I've never used Grok or any AI.I assume it's for brown people.
>>526081279i’ll always remember what i saw on the drone streams nobody can take that from me
>>526083055Its not inconsequential. Its a huge step to limiting access to computers. First laws are passed. Then that justifies enforcement measures. What happens when you ban deep fakes and people keep making them on their home computers? That's when you are justified to take enforcement measures. Computer loicenses. State mandated spyware. Caps on how powerful a GPU can be.
>gonna buy one of these.
>>526080129It's too late. We will have nationwide wireless p2p mesh networks running on older hardware soon. https://www.ditto.com/solutions/peer-to-peer-mesh-networking