There is no such thing as citizenship without consent. In the same way that an American citizen cannot declare himself a French citizen and vote in French elections without consent from the French government, a foreign national cannot declare himself a U.S. citizen without consent.Citizenship in a Constitutional Federal Republic means holding equal political power over the collective decisions. That is something only existing citizens hold the right to offer to others, something which must be decided through elections and the lawmaking process.The court's ruling in Elk v. Wilkins in 1884 - just 16 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment -endorses "the principle that no one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent." By making entry into the United States without approval a federal offense, Congress has effectively denied that consent.The court's ruling in US v. Wong Kim Ark in 1898 just 30 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment - Stated the “main purpose” of the provision (Clause 1 of the 14TH A) was to “establish the citizenship” of freed slaves, thus overruling the Dred Scott (1857) decision. The limitation of the “subject to jurisdiction” clause, the court held, applied only to the children of foreign diplomats and the children of “alien enemies” born during “hostile occupation.”Continued...
The Trump administration’s novel argument is that ”jurisdiction” actually means “primary political allegiance,” which excludes “the children of temporary visitors or illegal aliens,” even if they are fully subject to U.S. law.The Trump Administration also argues that the 14th Amendment does not provide consent. But that Instead it sets a limitation. To the authors of the 14th Amendment, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" conveyed a limit to natural citizenship grounded in mutual allegiance. That means if people are free to deny their old national allegiance, and an independent nation is free to decide its own membership, the recognition of a new national identity must be mutual.Immigrants living in the United States illegally have not accepted the sovereignty of the nation's laws. On the other side of the coin, the government has not officially accepted them as residents under its protection.
>>526102831also in Wong Ark, the Supreme Court officially naturalized the Ark family by striking down the treaty which denied Chinese the ability to naturalize.the Ark family was stuck on permanent residency due to that treaty and ending that restriction made the Ark family naturalized.this is important as there are no such restrictions anymore. permanent residents who never try to become citizens should not be able to shit out citizens either.
>>526102896You can talk about this subject without first understanding Law of the Sea.Research Jordan Maxwell. He explains it in many if his presentations on YouTube. That is the Roman Trust of the US govt claiming they own any vessels that are birthed here.
>>526102831so they're going to deport the first lady?
