https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/01/16/xswm-j16.htmlPopulations exposed to industrial toxins are forced to adapt, by evolving, or die out. In other words, what doesn't kill you makes you stronger, like Nietzsche, and by exposing people to toxins, we are giving them a chance to prove their strength. If they prove to be weak by dying from the pollution, then they didn't deserve to continue living anyway. And if they prove to be strong by evolving new traits to counteract the toxic chemicals, then we have improved the gene pool and the quality of our people. So when it comes to pollution, the more the merrier. We should never have cleaned our countries up starting with the Earth Movement in the 1970s, but let them become evolutionary petri dishes to select the New Man who can withstand the Industrialized World.China is now far ahead of us in evolution, as is India. Their people will evolve traits that make them impervious to industrial toxins before we ever go because our environments are too clean nowadays. TLDR: Pollution is good and forces us to evolve into stronger kinds of animals.
>>526130320Also, being named "East Palestine" is not going to win any support or sympathy for the so called "victims" of industrial toxins in that area. Why did they name their city after Palestinians?They should rename the place to "East Israel" if they want "help" (really, the toxins are the help - helping them to evolve, therefore improve, or perish like they deserve if they don't evolve). It's just like the name "labor unions." Bad choice of name from the start, since no US conservative could like a "union." The Union was the bad guy in American history according to conservatives. The Confederacy was the good guy. Conservative workers would have been far less hostile to labor unions, perhaps even amicable to these organizations, if they were named labor confederacies instead.
