[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 48.jpg (27 KB, 268x310)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
white people get to sign up to deport brown people and "reclaim the country", but it is essentially a civil war on american soil that will end up killing a lot of white people in the name of patriotism
>>
>>526178412
>Civil war

This is how comfortable and pampered Gen Z is, two weeks of riots in Minneapolis is apparently a civil war.
>>
>>526178412
Natural overcorrection in response to tongue in cheek open border policy and dems trying to bank on an illegal voting bloc voting between a party that promises them more free shit and rights alongside slipping between the cracks for longer or voting red and for their own deportation.

Friendly reminder dems firmly lost demographics 16-50, barely edged out a win for 50-60 and firmly won 60+ spoonfed by the TV boomers.

Civil war would be a good thing and a cleansing of both groups of vocal minorities acting like evangelists and purity checkers. Kill them all.
>>
>>526179015
You're gonna lose the midterms LOL
>>
>>526178412
go away zoomer
>>
>>526179114
>whatabout
Think about how these don't align.

>16-20 firm red
>20-30 firm red
>30-40 firm red
>40-50 firm red
>50-60 dems win 44/56
>60+ dems win

Look around you. Think about how many of the silent majority/unconcerned have decided your party does not represent them.

I hope we have a civil war, so you and the gay little tribe you lump anyone who disagrees with you into die sooner than later. Polls intended to herd sheep only matter so much in the long run when people realize they're being herded into a slaughterhouse.
>>
>>526178412
>will end up killing a lot of white people in the name of patriotism
More like it'll end up killing a lot of criminal "activists" in the name of enforcing the law
>>
>>526179835
Awww go cry more fucking pieace of shit nazi human garbage :)
>>
>>526178412
If any whites are purposefully blocking ICE deporting illegals, they should already be considered as traitors.
>>
>>526178412
>white people
>ice agents
Pick one bro
>>
>>526178412
People that allow illegal shitskin invaders into my country aren't white
>>
>>526178412
Funny, considering there's idf in ice
>>
>>526178412
>civil war on american soil
civil war on american soil would be leftoids being eating by niggers in cities
this is nothing compared to the niggers riots of 2020
>>
>>526180639
Celebrating the writing on the wall is crying? Keep coping, especially when illegals stop showing on the census and your party loses its actual illegal voting bloc.
>>
>>526178412
How do you know they arent all kikes with their faces covered? It was a kike that shot that one bitch
>>
>>526181273
You should join ice so when you go to a restaurant they can spit in your food :)
>>
>>526178412
So true
bootlickers will tell you different tho
But its israel maga chuds so take that how you will
>>
>>526178412
this is good. white people have been breeding too many retarded psychopaths
>>
>>526178412
I think war might be good for this country. We have to get the kikes and shit coloreds out. They will flee like roaches the second it pops off.
>>
>>526181466
You should keep crying more in the face of statistics and illegals getting deported.
>>
>>526180639
Youre gonna be hunted kike
>>
>>526180655
Theyre considered kikes or terrorists and should be shot on site
>>
>>526181273
>He thinks illegals bother voting
Most actual registered voters dont even bother voting, retard. Even Trump knows Republicans are losing the midterms in huge fashion and hes hinted at trying cancel elections which is impossible but shows hes scared
>>
>>526181721
Statistically speaking and according to polls waved by the DNC on the campaign trail for being so biased in their favor about 30% of the country approves of their job. Ironically, more self identifying Republicans approved than democrats.

Not even their own constituents like them.
>>
>>526178412
Civil war for the benefit of jews and jeets. Good job amerimutts!
>>
>>526178412
You want to make an omelet you gotta break a few eggs.
>>
>>526181817
I'm gonna repeat

>16-50 firmly lost
>50-60 won by dems 44/56
>60+ boomers, AKA the demographic that actually votes the most, they firmly won

Take a look around you next time you're outside.
>>
>>526181817
Youve never voted in person then. You should see these disgusting inbred mexcreants that show up to vote. I cant vote in their country. They and their enablers deserve painful death.
>>
>>526181951
>60+ boomers, AKA the demographic that actually votes the most, they firmly won
Most of the no kings protesters (millions upon millions of people) have been white boomers. Maybe you should go outside because the people you think support this regime actually despise you right now
>>
File: 1766998854724457.jpg (14 KB, 255x247)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>526178412
ICE basically just recruited the lowest IQ losers in society with the promise of "getting rid of all the brown people" except what ended up happening is that 99% of white people are fighting against them because they know they're bootlicking fascists
>>
>>526182143
>Most of the bleeding hearts have been white boomers
So I was correct? What part is incorrect? I said 60+ actually, objectively, statistically and provenly vote disproportionately often compared to ANY younger age demographic.

I already knew I was right from knowing objective facts about how both parties are doing, what was your point?
>>
>>526182245
Republicans are losing the midterms in historic fashion, no amount of cope is changing that
>>
>>526182396
Strange, only 30% of the country approved of dems on the most recent polls they've waved on the campaign trails since the days of Bush Jr.

Same polls say 60+ is the main demographic they won while firmly losing the rest and you agreed with me most people out protesting No Kings are 60+.

Cope, seethe and mald that you don't know what the fuck you're on about enough trying for a gotcha that you found yourself agreeing with me.
>>
>>526178915
Many ICE raids are criticized as unconstitutional not because immigration enforcement itself is illegal, but because the methods often violate core constitutional protections.

First, the Fourth Amendment requires judicial warrants and probable cause for home entries and arrests. ICE frequently relies on administrative warrants, which are not issued by judges and do not authorize entry into private homes. When agents enter anyway—without consent or exigent circumstances—courts have held this can amount to unlawful searches and seizures.

Second, the Fifth Amendment guarantees due process to all “persons,” not just citizens. Critics argue raids often involve detention without clear notice, limited access to hearings, family separation, and expedited removals that bypass meaningful judicial review. This shifts power from courts to the executive, undermining constitutional safeguards designed to prevent arbitrary detention.

Third, aggressive raids raise federalism concerns. Under the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering doctrine, the federal government cannot force states or cities to enforce federal law. When enforcement bypasses local legal norms or uses funding threats, it erodes the balance between federal and state authority.

Calling this a “step toward civil war” does not mean violence is imminent. Historically, internal conflict begins with institutional breakdown, not gunfire. When law enforcement is perceived as selectively targeting a population, normalizing executive overreach, and suspending rights for certain groups, public trust in neutral rule of law collapses. Once people believe force replaces law, legitimacy erodes—and polarization deepens.

A government that enforces laws outside constitutional limits weakens its own authority. Immigration enforcement can be constitutional, but when it disregards warrants, due process, and federalism, it undermines the legal framework that prevents civil conflict in the first place.
>>
>>526178412
>is ICE the sign tapping meme?
Yes, or at the very least the counter-play to being called out by the sign tapping meme.
>>
>>526182711
>Institutional breakdown
Illegals can vote and have at least one generation of progeny that can vote and said profeny currently legally are rejected by every country.

When questioning if institutional checks and balances have eroded, remember that one party is deliberately cultivating an illegal voter bloc faced with voting for more benefits and longer slipping between the cracks or voting for their own deportation should of team red making concessions to play ball treating them as a voting bloc too.

We're well eroded.
>>
>>526182711
>Probable cause
The probable cause is there may be illegals or niggers.
>Due process
This is the due process. Being detained for processing is processing.
>Federalism concerns
Nothingburger. Stop harboring criminals. Nigger.
>>
>>526183000
Short of team red*
>>
>>526179835
Eight thousand boomers die every day as well. The future is going to be amazing.
>>
>>526183228
Precisely. The only generation they won firmly are the TV boomer generation. Same tactics won't work on anything lower and the one consolidated bloc they hold are literally dying of natural causes more than any other voter bloc.
>>
>>526183000
First, undocumented immigrants cannot vote in U.S. federal elections. Voting requires citizenship, and non-citizen voting in federal elections is a felony that risks deportation. There is no evidence of a meaningful “illegal voter bloc.” Multiple investigations, including bipartisan and conservative-led ones, have found vanishingly small rates of non-citizen voting, insufficient to affect outcomes.

Second, the claim about “at least one generation of progeny” misunderstands birthright citizenship, which is not a Democratic invention but a constitutional rule under the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War. Children born in the U.S. are citizens regardless of their parents’ status. This is not unique to the U.S.; many democracies grant citizenship by birth or residence, and no country treats U.S.-born citizens as “illegal.”

Third, citizen children are not a captive voting bloc. Voting behavior among U.S.-born citizens of immigrant families varies widely by class, religion, region, and ideology. There is no evidence they vote uniformly “for more benefits” or against enforcement. In fact, many support stricter immigration controls.

Fourth, the idea that Democrats are “deliberately cultivating” illegal voters collapses logically: people who cannot vote cannot be a voting bloc. Policies toward immigrants may be debated on economic or humanitarian grounds, but calling them electoral manipulation confuses policy outcomes with electoral mechanics.

Finally, erosion of checks and balances occurs when executive power bypasses law, courts, and constitutional limits, not when Congress debates immigration policy or when courts enforce citizenship rules written into the Constitution.
>>
>>526183354
They probably thought smartphones would be the next link in the chain but severely underestimated memetics.
>>
>>526183416
I'm going to stop at the first sentence because it's full of shit.

In many blue states all you need is an address to vote and for 4 years what you were given when you get bus'd up to the border and surrender to border patrol was a sponsored address- from which one can legally vote in many such states.

California took it further and used taxpayer dollars to offer housing loans ONLY to illegals.

Can you acknowledge this or are you a propagandist?
>>
>>526183570
The claim collapses under basic election law.

First, no U.S. state allows non-citizens to vote in federal elections. Every voter registration requires an affirmation of U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. Lying is a felony and, for non-citizens, grounds for deportation. States differ on ID requirements, but citizenship eligibility does not vary by state.

Second, having an address does not confer voting rights. Shelter, sponsor, or temporary addresses are used only to assign a precinct after eligibility is established. Asylum seekers or undocumented immigrants given sponsored addresses are still legally barred from voting. There is no legal mechanism by which “being bused and given an address” allows someone to vote.

Third, the idea of a large illegal voter bloc is unsupported by evidence. Multiple audits, court cases, and investigations—including under Republican administrations—find non-citizen voting to be vanishingly rare. If it were widespread, it would show up in voter roll checks against jury pools, Social Security, and immigration databases. It does not.

Fourth, the California housing claim is misrepresented. California did not offer housing loans “only to illegals.” Some programs allowed lawfully present, work-authorized non-citizens (such as DACA recipients) to apply for assistance. Undocumented immigrants without legal status were not broadly eligible, and none of this affects voting eligibility.

Finally, the core logic fails: people who cannot legally vote cannot be a voting bloc. You can oppose immigration policy on economic or cultural grounds, but calling it electoral manipulation confuses policy disagreement with election law.

This isn’t propaganda, it’s how voting law actually works. Disliking a policy doesn’t make false claims about elections true.
>>
>>526183754
I guess we're going to disagree because despite on paper it being forbid it has become a controversy to forbid it to begin with in recent times.

Covering your eyes, ears and doubling down on "Isn't happening" is why we're stuck with the orange man again when that was the MO towards the average nobody.
>>
>>526183879
Present me with one good piece of evidence that what you're saying is true. Show me evidence of these massive amounts of illegal votes.
>>
>>526184001
Your implication Newsom himself never proudly rolled out loans for illegals to buy housing comes across as incredibly bad faith despite presenting as otherwise and indicative of how any other piece of reality brought forward contradictory to your stance will be dismissed rather than acknowledged.
>>
Furthermore, I do not need to argue about what has already happened and already been rejected by the equivalent of a sophist with an ego.
>>
>>526184094
This is a mischaracterization, not bad faith.

Newsom did not roll out “loans for illegals” in the way you’re implying. What California changed was eligibility rules for a first-time homebuyer assistance program, allowing some non-citizens who are lawfully present and work-authorized (notably DACA recipients) to apply. These are people who pay taxes, have Social Security numbers, and are legally allowed to work. That is materially different from “illegal immigrants” as a category.

Undocumented immigrants without lawful presence were not broadly eligible, and the program was not exclusive to non-citizens. Citizens remained eligible on the same terms. Calling this “loans for illegals” strips away the legal distinctions that actually matter.

More importantly, even if one opposes the policy, it has nothing to do with voting. Housing assistance does not confer citizenship, voter registration, or voting eligibility. Non-citizens, DACA or otherwise, still cannot vote in federal elections. Linking a housing policy to claims of electoral manipulation is a category error.

Acknowledging that California expanded eligibility to certain non-citizens is fair. Pretending that this equals Democrats creating an “illegal voter bloc” is not. That leap requires ignoring election law, eligibility rules, and evidence.

Disagreement over whether the policy is wise is legitimate. Recasting it as proof of democratic erosion or bad-faith manipulation is not supported by the facts.
>>
>>526178915
Not a civil war but what you see in MN is white on white violence in a fight for Somalis and other shitskins. Fucking madness.
>>
>>526178412
Most Americans don't realize how over it is or how brainwashed everyone is. Even if ICE killed every stupid leftist that harassed them then we'd still be ruled by Zionist jews and the country would still be brainwashed.
>>
>>526184332
thanks ChatGPT
>>
>>526184332
When you deny something that went through a legislative loop in its whole before being rejected by higher courts you are bad faith and to be written off as mistaking writing a longer letter as being more effective than a short, concise one.
>>
>>526178915
Ya , not a single explosion either

Our forefathers would of ran at a machine gun nest with fixed bayonets

These ice agents have yet to meet Americans who don't fear death , yet lol
>>
>>526184510
...It really is just a salty contrarian prompting a free model ain't it?
>>
>>526184514
you are talking to ChatGPT
>>
>>526182711
>emdash-ridden wordvomit
STFU fagGPT
>>
>>526184638
I guess I'm fine with my ideology being platformed without resistance.
>>
>>526182711
Thanks, Grok.
>>
>>526184514
That accusation misstates what’s being denied.

No one is denying that California pursued policies expanding access to benefits for certain non-citizens or that those policies went through legislative and legal scrutiny. The denial is of the reframing of those policies as “loans for illegals” or as evidence of electoral manipulation. Those are not the same claim.

A policy can pass a legislature, face litigation, and even be limited or clarified by courts without the original public characterization being accurate. Courts rejecting or narrowing a policy does not retroactively validate an exaggerated description of it. Legal process is not proof that the rhetoric surrounding a policy was correct.

Calling this “bad faith” confuses disagreement over interpretation with denial of reality. The core factual points remain:

The programs in question applied to lawfully present, work-authorized non-citizens, not undocumented immigrants as a class

They did not confer voting rights

They were not designed to create a voting bloc

Length has nothing to do with effectiveness here. Precision does. A short claim that collapses legal distinctions may feel punchy, but it’s still wrong. Correcting that isn’t bad faith—it’s basic accuracy.

Disagreement over whether the policy was wise is legitimate. Treating legal nuance as dishonesty is not.
>>
>>526184652
>>526184693
I love how all you faggots can do is say "thanks AI" because you have no logical or factual way to refute it lmao
>>
>>526184817
Your AI chatbot hallucinated pretty hard so I ain't reading that either. Try Claude and buy a membership broke.

Find something that doesn't sabotage itself by denying reality. Good luck getting that leaning on an AI to argue on your behalf though.
>>
>>526184928
When you actually posted twice your vernacular is quite a bit different. Good job jumping the shark retard that inherently trusts AI so much you let it get crowned on by a fucking memeflag.
>>
>>526184928
>hey grok refute this
that's all it takes, retard
i make them fight all the time
>>
>>526178412
Yes. The USA would need to use all the local, state, federal cops and military to actually dent Illegal Immigrant numbers in the country. This is just media distraction so you stop asking about the Epstein Files, Epstein Island, the flight logs and Nancy Pelosi’s Stock Positions.
>>
>>526178412
>white
post it
>>
>>526182711
No. You do not get constitutional protections unless you are citizen of the nation. Illegals are not citizens. Go be a jew elsewhere with your failure to understand law written by Whites, your betters.
>>
>>526178412
>I can't think about anything outside of the context of this shitty vague astroturfed shitpost from 3 years ago
Fucking brainrot KEK
>>
>>526178412
>1PBTID OP
>yet another DNC paid for shill thread attacking ICE for removing their precious shitskin illegals
Sage
Kill yourself, kike
>>
>>526178412
Not a fan of the civil war angle, but this is probably the only loophole we have to cull brainwashed NGO goycattle
>>
>>526184958
>Find something that doesn't sabotage itself by denying reality. Good luck getting that leaning on an AI to argue on your behalf though.
Ah, so your refutation is "nuh uh." Got it. Any facts or data to refute it? Last chance...
>>
>>526185009
Oh, and the fact it took you that long to catch on is pretty funny. I wasn't even trying to hide it lol
>>
File: 1765068911220789m.jpg (122 KB, 806x1024)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>526185526
Rich coming from a retard that relies on AI to be their "nah uh" and said AI hallucinated at the worst possible moment. Very ironic.
>>
>>526178412
>that will end up killing a lot of white people
As long as the left dies, I do not care.
>>
File: 1760600070010257.jpg (31 KB, 352x352)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>526185654
>I was merely pretending to be retarded and then totally not upset giving back to back (You)'s
>>
>>526185659
What did it hallucinate? Explain what was wrong and demonstrate how you're right.
>>
>>526185811
The nice thing about reality, much like the loans I spoke of, is whether or not you believe it, it remains indifferent. Cope on.
>>
>>526185718
lol I wasn't the dumbass arguing with an obvious chatbot :3
>>
>>526185855
>my reality is real because i say it's real because... ugh it's just REAL OKAY!!!
>>
File: 1763013742565010.png (70 KB, 223x229)
70 KB
70 KB PNG
>>526185883
>Try to get a pwn with AI
>Don't know what you're on about
>Trust in the *free public domain* AI
>shown to be retarded
>"I was merely pretending"
>>
File: 1762971409941544.jpg (66 KB, 838x481)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>526185932
>I might not know what I'm on about but the AI will pwn the chuds
>I'm not mad btw
>>
>>526178412
His plate carrier is too low
>>
>>526185988
Are you going to tell me why you are right? Are you going to provide sources and data to back up your claim? Or are we done here?
>>
>>526186041
Ooh look at you, double-posting like a madman! Did I get under your skin?
>>
>>526186071
I already did and you're still going at the "nah uh" you projected.

I'm not spooning it to you again.
>>
>>526186155
You might want to look at where it began.

If you're gonna get angry I'm gonna mock you openly.
>>
>>526178412
One retarded dyke died. That's it.
>>
>>526186156
>>526186215

>I already did
Haha, sure ya did, kiddo. You got your asshole blown out and you know it. Now you're just shitposting to save face. lmao what a loser you are! Stupid nigger dumb dumb ;)
>>
>>526185334
>>
>>526186345
Look at you go buddy, now you don't have to keep replying on cooldown to the two strings you started in a moment of shitting your own pants.
>>
File: 1748328706645653.gif (90 KB, 500x522)
90 KB
90 KB GIF
yes
it's two factions of retarded brainwashed goyim (one believing in a false prophecy and the other being jewish agents of chaos like bolsheviks) killing each other while also being flanked by retarded jewish bioweapons. everyone loses in the end and we are nearing the end of a cycle while kikes are slowly tapering off their relationship with the US as it falls into decay and eventually eats itself from the inside out. all of the infighting is inorganic and allowed to distract you from actual issues (reminder that antifa was designated a terrorist org yet they still receive funding from kikes)

also while this all happens we are slowly seeing the lockdown of the internet and more and more propaganda being pumped out while civilization decays even further
>>
>>526186420
>now you don't have to keep replying on cooldown to the two strings you started in a moment of shitting your own pants.
I quite literally have no idea what this means, and I've been here since '09. All I know is you got owned by an obvious chatbot. I even left the em dashes in for fucks sake! And you have no facts or data to support your claim. You get nothing. You lose. Good day sir,
>>
>>526186738
>Uses AI the whole time
>"haha, you know nothing!"
Friendly reminder the only demographics the DNC won on their own campaign trail polls are 60+.
>>
>>526186852
>Friendly reminder the only demographics the DNC won on their own campaign trail polls are 60+.
Friendly reminder that none of that matters since Trump is fucking up so badly that at this point Americans will elect a retarded chimp in a tophat over him. See you at the midterms ;)
>>
>>526187044
>Friendly reminder imo imo imo
Cool blog. What part of that is demonstrable fact you're loaded with?
>>
>>526184435
>white on white violence
libtards arent white.
>>
>>526187108
>What part of that is demonstrable fact you're loaded with?
>i can't tell thedifference between a fact and a hypothesis
Figures. How about this - step off /pol/ for a minute and watch the fucking news. You'll find your answer there. People hate this administration, and Trump currently holds the record for the worst polling at this point in his second term compared to every president in history since polling began. How's that for a fact?
>>
>>526187854
>Go watch TV
That explains a lot.

Friendly reminder they won the TV generations and nobody else.
>>
>>526188457
>That explains a lot.
And where do you get your news from? Info Wars? Newsmax? Facebook? X? lmao
>>
File: 1759851607785528.jpg (77 KB, 900x875)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>526188617
I use AI rather than rely on AI and primarily use financial outlets or Bloomberg. For all else, Ground.

I'd also like to mention part of why TV is such a terrible medium is because there are no comments, no room to brook argument, no community notes- nothing of the sort in any form whatsoever.

Makes one think about why there's such a hard generational divide and whether or not being able to not only say but prove someone is full of shit or bad faith routinely has something to do with it.

Your last bastion are dying old boomers. It's already over. You want progress, progress is here in the sunset years of the TV generation.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.