starmer spying on EVERYTHING from aprilhttps://uk.news.yahoo.com/starmer-hell-bent-destroying-private-170740405.htmltl;dr they are backdoor-ing everything and spying on everything you send, before encryption, encryption means nothing, they are essentially installing keyloggers on everything.>to protect the children though!bullshit, we all know that's a cover, it's just to quash opposition or any opposing ideals to globohomo, so what do we actually fucking do?
>>526179018>what can we actually do about this?starmer-->thames
>>526179018Look at what Iranians are doing right now.
>>526179018>>to protect the children though!Except those poor ukrainian war orphans that Keir Starmer beasted on - there's no protecting them.
>>526179179i meant more from a technological standpoint to circumvent it
>>526179249Quadcopter drones are marvelous pieces of technology. You could probably strap a microphone on one to give your local politician or police chief a piece of your mind.
>>526179018Radio communications, couriers, in-person meetups, letters, notes left in dead drop locations. All pretty straightforward you just need people to coordinate with and go out and practice it. Truth is many people are too fried to even do that, but it might be different in the UK since its smaller and transport in more widely available.
>>526179249cement shoes are a great tech.
>>526179617that's all well and good but i mean, someone idly says nigger or something in a message, it will no doubt get flagged to prevent ... wait, could we bot the bots like that?regardless, how can a person converse over the internet privately after starmergeddon?
>>526179826starlink with vpn.
>>526179249Get privacy phones and stop using mainstream apps like Whatsapp. The sclerotic pace of bureaucracy can be dodged for years just by using non-normie stuff.
>>526180460>The sclerotic pace of bureaucracy can be dodged for years just by using non-normie stuff.telegram any good? the creator is very privacy-centric. but i think the problem is, it won't matter: they will just spy on everything from the client side.
>>526179826>converse over the internet privatelyTherein lies your problem, you can't. The amount of surveillance vectors that today's governments possess are so varied and numerous that you can never be 100 percent certain that your communications aren't being mulled over by the state. Maybe VoIP or text chats in older online games aren't logged? I'm not as well inclined since people's privacy protocols are always changing and I gave up on chasing internet privacy when I found out just how much shit they can exploit in order to expose you. Whatever you do it'd probably have to include tradecraft measures like connecting to a public network physically displaced from where you live using a separate device for that specific communication channel, then when you finish communications you store the device in a faraday bag, non-cellular devices like cheap disposable WiFi tablets or laptops would be ideal, don't use windows since it takes routine screenshots and uploads that to the cloud for an AI to parse.
>>526180589I'm not sure, but from reading the article it sounds like it relies on tech companies installing backdoors into the respective apps. Obviously if you're on Android and it's at the OS level you're fucked, but there are alternatives like GrapheneOS.
>>526179018You literally wont do shit vaxxieAlso pre-christian tribes were hunted to cultural extinction by the West and weaker, state subservient bloodlines took overYou pretend you are one continuous bloodline from pagans and barbarians to subjects of state authorityYoure not; you are more different to a tribal pagan white who would rape and kill you and sell your whore mother into an Arab sex slave trade and your body in a bog than you are to a modern day African Negro in the USA
>>526180460Privacy phones typically end up being honeypots to catch criminals, a cellular device itself honestly seems like a non-starter since it's constantly beaming meta-data to nearby cell towers, even if you were to enclose your phone into a faraday bag while not in use it would appear obvious that someone is doing something suspicious as you'd disappear temporarily and then reappear. Phones should always be treated as snitch boxes.
>>526180685>I gave up on chasing internet privacy when I found out just how much shit they can exploit in order to expose you.ok yes, but i haven't been arrested yet, so i must be doing something right to go under the radar. but the radar will be bypassing EVERYTHING from april and reporting directly to the gov anything you say that flags up thier bot. they say it will just be terrorism, but look at what they class as terrorism: questioning immigration.
>>526180859>jewish whining
>>526179179tower of London
>>526179018>what can we actually do about this?AES-256 encryption.
>>526181366elaborate, because you seem to have misunderstood, they are bypassing the encryption.
>>526179249>>526180460Eventually they will trace you by your lack of presence, literally like in 1984. You just need to create a public persona ready to be spied on and confuse them in addition to using non-normie tech
>>526181335only if you were gonna throw him off it or hang him from it.
>>526181702Mutt eductaion
>>526181480How do they realistically do that? Blocking encrypted traffic?
>>526180589Russian, but you need to actually enable an encrypted chat for it to be encrypted. GrapheneOS with a Google Pixel is cool, too.
>>526181501>Eventually they will trace you by your lack of presenceezpz, anon.>"i don't need those silly gadgets to be nice to people. :)"always flip the script.
>>526181822>wasting time torturingstab him, bin him with the knife.
>>526181822>Scewingtons GivesNever heard of that one
>>526181480>elaborate, because you seem to have misunderstoodNo you've misunderstood.>they are bypassing the encryption.No individual, government or organisation can bypass AES-256. All governments, militaries and banks use AES-256 as it's deemed unbreakable. Just to put AES-256 into perspective, the heat death of the universe will occur before a government with current tech could break a AES-256 cipher.
>>526179018>DOSE YANKS INNIT, YUU JUS' GO'A LAFF ADDEM, WIVVER GUNS 'N KNOIFES 'N SUCH, BUNCH'A-->YOU'RE NICKED, TOSSER! YOU BEEN 'AVIN' INCORRECT OPINIONS???>n-n-no c-c-cor bloimey Sir I wuddin't lookin' at no Palestinian resistance groups, s'truth, I-I think Sir Lord Starmer looks well fit in that tuxedo, h-he ain't fat at all->SAYS HERE YOU CALLED HIM FAT ON DISCORD, GUV!>N-n-no it was-- it was a draft, i never sent it-->TWO YEARS IN THE CLINK, INNIT, AND YOU'LL BE WAITIN' FOUR YEARS FOR THE TRIAL!
>>526181822i'd cum so fucking hard.
>>526179018No more brother wars!
>>526179018I would be willing to bet that the first two images depict French people. But then again, Anglo-Saxons love to rewrite history to their advantage. It reassures them.
>>526183498>spain and india tacked on in black and white lmao your tricks could not be more obvious
>>526183498ftfy
>>526184763Why would you do that saar
>>526182188no you have misunderstood, they are not breaking the encryption, they are BYPASSING it, at your end, they log your message before you send it.
>>526179216They are not doing anything anymore...
>>526179018>what can we actually do about this?
>>526179018This picture should show peasants from different eras. All my ancestors were descendants of peasants, literally none of them were professional soldiers
>>526179018>Telegraph wank bait article First thing you need to do is stop consuming any content from the daily mail, the Telegraph, the express, gbnews, talk tv. It's all lies and Tory propaganda.
>>526181335>>526179179is this a threat?
>>526183498remove us from there stupid mutt, I want 5 of these to stop existing.
