how can the west realistically compete with china?think about it
>>52620158867
8 + 5 * 10
In China, they execute Karens.
>>52620158823, no basis to say otherwise.
There are two unknowns you can't answer the question.Fucking idiots.
>>52620158826
>>52620158858
>>5262015883a = 30 therefore a = 103b = 15 therefore b = 53c = 24 therefore c = 88 + 5 = 1313 * 10 = 130
>>526201766You missed the multiplication symbol in the last term.
>>526201854wrong order of operations bud, you need to do the multiplication firstits 58
>>526201854Fuck you pajeet
>>526201804troll
>>526201883Ah, 58.
>>526201588Pemdas5×10 is 50+8 is 158
>>526202053typo?
>>526202096Uh...yeah...
>>526201830>>526201967>>526202030it's 4 bags for the 24, not 3 you blind fucks, all of you are morons holy shit
>>526201621This was also a valid answer I checked
Man and Woman are worth 4Briefcase is 5Backpack is 6Therefore 6 + 2(5) X 4 = 46
>>526202157kekits just rage baiteasy otherwise
>>526202173this is the correct answer
>>526201967Yeah I’m retarded. I figured the trick would be in the algebra so I wasn’t paying attention.>>526201969Sir actually there is no need for you to be rude in such this way to me sir
>>526201588the answer is actually 46. i hate these gay trick math problems where they hide stuff.
>>526202157To be fair there’s like 10 pixels in the whole image, I could barely see it even after zooming in.As a retard, I like to take these threads as an opportunity to be humble.
>>526202208also there are two bags as well, and in the top question the man and woman are holding a handbagso its actually 3 * (man and woman + 6) = 303man+woman = 30/18man+woman = 30/54so the final equation is actually:6 + 10 * (30/54) = 6 + 300/54 = 600/54 or roughly 11.11maybe i fucked idk
>>526202473yeah i fucked up, goddamnit i must be tired, i divided by 18 instead of subtracting 18so its actually:man + woman = 4so its:6+10*4 = 46
>>526202444checked, and that's ok, because it turned out i'm also blind fuck and didn't pay attention to the double brown cases.. but in my defense I don't like brown stuff so I don't stare that much on them
What a low IQ board, Jesus Christ
>>526202758its just a ragebait image which is why they added the heckin "viral question" bullshit to itits just a pretty simple question after that
>>526202157Order of operations, leaf.
>>526201588Unsolvable because impossible to calculate the variable of this stupid scarf (circled) which also makes the people an impossible variable to calculate. The scarf can be either 9, 6 or 3 so the value of the people has to be either 1,2 or 3
>>526202845oh wow theres even more bullshit the more you look
>>526202845I guess the scarf could also be valued at zero which means the people could be 4 also
>>526202976couldnt it also be 30 and the people valued at zeroi mean, theres nothing else to go on, its only in one equation
>>526202845>>526202892>>526202976Its an artifact, or else the puzzle is impossible, to have a single answer
>>526203067They are holding the yellow bags so 6+6+6=18 so to get remaining 12 there is 5 possibilities.People are valued at either 0,1,2,3, or 4And scarf valued at either 0,3,6,9,12If people =0Scarf =12If people =1Scarf =9If people =2Scarf = 6If people = 3Scarf =3If people = 4Scarf=0
>>526203441oh yeah, forgot that part
>>526203390could be, but we dont know that, maybe thats the point, people are going to come up with many different possible solutions, so it leads to disagreement therefore engagement and then viralitythats the point of these stupid time wasting puzzles
>>526203441I am actually wrong because there is actually infinite possibilities because of negative values
>>526201588Solved it
>>526201588We dont have to compete with them, we can live separately in peace
>>526201588Assuming only positive, whole numbers:2a + b = 5 a =1 b=3c = 5d = 66 + (12 x a) = ?6 + (12 x 1) = 18Without the rule of not only being positive, whole numbers there is no one answer.Final answer: 18
>>526204148Without this rule the answer is a slope-intercept form with a resulting range betwen +/-54 using the formula: y=-(x/6)+6Work:2a + b = 5 a=(5-b)/2c = 5d = 66 + 6(5-b) = xx=6(5-y) +6
>>526203677Final answer solved with chat GTP. Fairly complex algebra
>>526204913This is incorrect as you assume there are three couples without a scarf when there are two.
>>52620158830+15+24=69too ez
>>526204913>>526204722if we count the scarf as a real variable in the puzzle, then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about it>>526203390this is the only real answeror else you guys are just doing what>>526203617 said
>>526205488>then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about itNo and yes. It's a range. The answer is in between -54 and 54.
>indian threadput indians and chinks in death camps asap
>>526205809a range is not a single answer, so only yesand if we consider negative numbers in this puzzle to be true then we can givethe scarf any negative number, something like -288 then the couple 100which makes the answer 1006, well beyond your 54
>>526205285The scarf was treated as it’s own variable and was accounted for >>526205488> if we count the scarf as a real variable in the puzzle, then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about itPic rel is the best answer we can get. This expression covers all possible answers and is in the cleanest algebraic form. So this is the answer.
