how can the west realistically compete with china?think about it
>>52620158867
8 + 5 * 10
In China, they execute Karens.
>>52620158823, no basis to say otherwise.
There are two unknowns you can't answer the question.Fucking idiots.
>>52620158826
>>52620158858
>>5262015883a = 30 therefore a = 103b = 15 therefore b = 53c = 24 therefore c = 88 + 5 = 1313 * 10 = 130
>>526201766You missed the multiplication symbol in the last term.
>>526201854wrong order of operations bud, you need to do the multiplication firstits 58
>>526201854Fuck you pajeet
>>526201804troll
>>526201883Ah, 58.
>>526201588Pemdas5×10 is 50+8 is 158
>>526202053typo?
>>526202096Uh...yeah...
>>526201830>>526201967>>526202030it's 4 bags for the 24, not 3 you blind fucks, all of you are morons holy shit
>>526201621This was also a valid answer I checked
Man and Woman are worth 4Briefcase is 5Backpack is 6Therefore 6 + 2(5) X 4 = 46
>>526202157kekits just rage baiteasy otherwise
>>526202173this is the correct answer
>>526201967Yeah I’m retarded. I figured the trick would be in the algebra so I wasn’t paying attention.>>526201969Sir actually there is no need for you to be rude in such this way to me sir
>>526201588the answer is actually 46. i hate these gay trick math problems where they hide stuff.
>>526202157To be fair there’s like 10 pixels in the whole image, I could barely see it even after zooming in.As a retard, I like to take these threads as an opportunity to be humble.
>>526202208also there are two bags as well, and in the top question the man and woman are holding a handbagso its actually 3 * (man and woman + 6) = 303man+woman = 30/18man+woman = 30/54so the final equation is actually:6 + 10 * (30/54) = 6 + 300/54 = 600/54 or roughly 11.11maybe i fucked idk
>>526202473yeah i fucked up, goddamnit i must be tired, i divided by 18 instead of subtracting 18so its actually:man + woman = 4so its:6+10*4 = 46
>>526202444checked, and that's ok, because it turned out i'm also blind fuck and didn't pay attention to the double brown cases.. but in my defense I don't like brown stuff so I don't stare that much on them
What a low IQ board, Jesus Christ
>>526202758its just a ragebait image which is why they added the heckin "viral question" bullshit to itits just a pretty simple question after that
>>526202157Order of operations, leaf.
>>526201588Unsolvable because impossible to calculate the variable of this stupid scarf (circled) which also makes the people an impossible variable to calculate. The scarf can be either 9, 6 or 3 so the value of the people has to be either 1,2 or 3
>>526202845oh wow theres even more bullshit the more you look
>>526202845I guess the scarf could also be valued at zero which means the people could be 4 also
>>526202976couldnt it also be 30 and the people valued at zeroi mean, theres nothing else to go on, its only in one equation
>>526202845>>526202892>>526202976Its an artifact, or else the puzzle is impossible, to have a single answer
>>526203067They are holding the yellow bags so 6+6+6=18 so to get remaining 12 there is 5 possibilities.People are valued at either 0,1,2,3, or 4And scarf valued at either 0,3,6,9,12If people =0Scarf =12If people =1Scarf =9If people =2Scarf = 6If people = 3Scarf =3If people = 4Scarf=0
>>526203441oh yeah, forgot that part
>>526203390could be, but we dont know that, maybe thats the point, people are going to come up with many different possible solutions, so it leads to disagreement therefore engagement and then viralitythats the point of these stupid time wasting puzzles
>>526203441I am actually wrong because there is actually infinite possibilities because of negative values
>>526201588Solved it
>>526201588We dont have to compete with them, we can live separately in peace
>>526201588Assuming only positive, whole numbers:2a + b = 5 a =1 b=3c = 5d = 66 + (12 x a) = ?6 + (12 x 1) = 18Without the rule of not only being positive, whole numbers there is no one answer.Final answer: 18
>>526204148Without this rule the answer is a slope-intercept form with a resulting range betwen +/-54 using the formula: y=-(x/6)+6Work:2a + b = 5 a=(5-b)/2c = 5d = 66 + 6(5-b) = xx=6(5-y) +6
>>526203677Final answer solved with chat GTP. Fairly complex algebra
>>526204913This is incorrect as you assume there are three couples without a scarf when there are two.
>>52620158830+15+24=69too ez
>>526204913>>526204722if we count the scarf as a real variable in the puzzle, then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about it>>526203390this is the only real answeror else you guys are just doing what>>526203617 said
>>526205488>then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about itNo and yes. It's a range. The answer is in between -54 and 54.
>indian threadput indians and chinks in death camps asap
>>526205809a range is not a single answer, so only yesand if we consider negative numbers in this puzzle to be true then we can givethe scarf any negative number, something like -288 then the couple 100which makes the answer 1006, well beyond your 54
>>526205285The scarf was treated as it’s own variable and was accounted for >>526205488> if we count the scarf as a real variable in the puzzle, then it is impossible to have a single answer, there is no other ways about itPic rel is the best answer we can get. This expression covers all possible answers and is in the cleanest algebraic form. So this is the answer.
>>526207042>a range is not a single answer,How I know you've never done even pre-calculus. Even answers like [-∞,∞] is a possible answer to a certain question.Actually now with your example I think Wolfram alpha, for some reason, only goes with an x-range of [-54,54]. The answer is really [-∞,∞]. If the question has a hidden rule of only positive integers then the answer is simply 18.>>526207130>The scarf was treated as it’s own variable and was accounted forAh I see that now.
>>526207130>all possible answerswhich is not a single answer>So this is the answer.nope, its literally just infinity at that point, which is beyond the scope of the definition of a puzzle if a puzzle can be solved in 10 thousands ways, it is not a puzzle
>>526207400>How I know you've never done even pre-calculus.nice assumption there, in reality I solve puzzles as leisure, and going into applying full blown mathematical terms like "range" on simple puzzles is just nonsense as i said here>>526207433the answer is 46 enough said
>>526201588>she isn't holding the yellow backpack in the last questionI fucking hate trick questions like this
>>526207649>and going into applying full blown mathematical terms like "range" on simple puzzles is just nonsense
>>526207433The question never said it had to be a single numeric answer, the best we can do is an expression of all possible answers and since that’s the best we can do that is the answer.
>>5262015886 + 10 x 446
>>526201588= vacation
>>52620158884?
>>526207744The answer is 18
>>526207850I love how you keep getting all your answers wrong and now you just delving into straw-man meme arguments and the answer is not even 18, but I’ll let you figure it out yourself Mr +/-54>>526208021the puzzle itself doesn’t have the space to put all the answers in, puzzles cannot be infinite, only math problemsthe answer is 46 nothing elseI’ll leave this for you schizos, laterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0qmkQGqpM8
>>526208362The woman and man = 2But they equal 8 when the woman is holding the yellow backpack2x5=1010+8= 18
>>52620823358 moron!
>>526201588CHING CHONG! HERRO ROUND EYE! HOW CAN WHITE BOY COMPETEARU WITH RICE BOY?
>>526201588Eh take your pick from the ages past really.Practically though we don't need to, it ain't a capable externally focussed power as that shit quickly ends in weakness and unrest for them.Of all the powers the world could see rise China is the biggest non-issue for us.
>>526201588>how can the west realistically compete with china?they have a birthrate of 1 child per woman. their looming demographic collapse is significantly worse than the west's
>>526201588this isnt really an iq testits more of a "can you spot the minor differences" test
>>526208449> the puzzle itself doesn’t have the space to put all the answers in, puzzles cannot be infinite, only math problemsNot a puzzle, it’s a math problem
>>526209119Fuck, I didn't even notice the double backpackFuck this bullshit
>>526209285these type of tests are meant to confuse you, nothing else
like, what the fuck does that scarf equali dont know
>>526209222This puzzle became impossible when the "scarf" (more like a black tissue hence my artifact claim) was considered.You turned it into a separate math problem, where pure AI slop "infinity" is now an answer to a puzzle.>>526209528the "scarf" can be anything you want, according to the geniuses here
>>526203390How the fuck does 6+6+6=24 you fucking Somali IQ nigger?
