[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1754286599011107.png (513 KB, 1024x1024)
513 KB
513 KB PNG
> not bait, not a tutorial

asking this because everyone talks about guns, but almost no one explains where the line actually is.

who should have the right to own a gun, and who shouldn’t?

reply with your reason, simple and straight.
>>
>>526224291
free white men who own property
>>
>>526224291
shall not be infringed stupid jew nigger demon
>>
Well politically speaking there's no such thing as should. Adults (age of the majority) in USA are legally entitled to own firearms unless they disquality themselves somehow
>>
Either everybody gets guns or nobody gets them. Regulations are retarded and don't do shit. What you're looking for is not allowing the profoundly mentally disabled from owning firearms.
>>
convicted criminals serving a sentence shouldn't have access to guns
the reason is that restriction of freedoms is the punishment for crimes
other than that there should be no restrictions
>>
>>526224379
>>526224371
> SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED JEW NIGGER DEMON SCUM
>>
>>526224291
No guns for gays, trannies, drug addicts or brown people
>>
>>526224291
..."shall not be infringed..."
So they can be REASONABLY LIMITED but with that said the federal government cannot make any gun legislation via 10th amendment and that there is no amendment added to the constitution about gun legislation.
>>
I'm fairly hesitant to allow not-yet-convicted niggers ownership of cruise missiles with nukes. Also I'm not ok with jeets being allowed to arm themselves with sarin gas.
>>
>>526224291
There should be a test/license requirement to keep weapons out of the hands of those with a low IQ (browns).
>>
>>526224291
I should own all the guns, and use them on brazilian frogposters who are not mentally competent enough to own a firearms themselves
>>
>>526225637
I assume a (((doctor))) or a (((civil servant))) will be in charge of the testing and licensing?
>>
>>526224291
>but almost no one explains where the line actually is
everyone has the right to keep and bear arms
>>
>>526224291
That's a slick Jewish way of saying nobody.
>>
File: Screenshot 21.png (257 KB, 1012x645)
257 KB
257 KB PNG
>>526224291
>>
>>526224291
There is no line. The only reason we have restrictions on gun ownership in this country is because men today are not the men our founding fathers were. Meaning American men are buck broken niggers who have to ask their wives if it’s ok for them to stay out late on a work night.
>>
File: 1762345334495314.jpg (222 KB, 1280x853)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
>>526224291
Its a basic human right so removing it must be subject to due process by the gov. Same as putting someone in prison, which removes that and other basic rights.
>>
>>526225085
Niggers wouldnt be able to afford it
>>
>>526224356
>own property
So only Jews and boomers can vote? Update this shit retard, free white men who work and have children.
>>
/thread



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.