Why is it impossible for China to innovate? The USSR was way better at innovation and they're also commies. Meanwhile China is still Africa/India tier when it comes to technology and innovation. It's genetic right? East Asians all suck at innovating
Bro Japs invented meth
>Simone GaoKek
>>526237414That's cope, considering china is already leading in several areas like EVs and robotics, drone tech, smartphone tech etc
>>526237414>The USSR was way better at innovation and they're also commies.Uhhhhh, WHAT???The USSR was the country that decided that COMPUTERS were "western degeneracy" for a period of decades...>Meanwhile China is still Africa/India tier when it comes to technologyNo, they're nowhere near that bad, but they're never going to invent things at the rate of a free society. Drilling your students in math while repressing free thought doesn't create innovators.
>>526237586
>>526237681show us the amount of patent filings per year
>>526237414The chinese tech sector uses english. They will undoubtable dominate over time.
>>526237414Chinks are a bug species. They excel at mimickry. no creative society would build replicas of entire cities and historic monuments like chinks do because it would be seen as uncreative, tacky and wholly pointless. Chinks lap it up like it's the real thing. Bug don't care.
>>526237681dumb nogger lover they have fucking Maglev trains and ffucking flying taxis
>>526237687Bibliometric indicators are a meme though, you can just pump out random slop metrics which china often does.
>>526237773they lap it up because they get sick from the smell in the real nigger infested Paris
>>526237794>here's why the authorotative Leiden rankings are falseI bet you went to a real good university
>>526237734Even if you wanted to compare that, you'd still have to filter all the patents for being worth a shit.And protip: If China had EVER decided that "patent application numbers" was some kind of measure for success, then they're going to DISTORT that metric to try and look good. They always do.>>526237789>they have fucking Maglev trains and ffucking flying taxisMag-levs are half-century-old technology that sucks, and no they don't have "flying taxis", you 3rd worlder...
>>526237932Proud and Dutch since the neolithic, you fucking jew bred chimera
>>526237789We have flying taxis, no maglevs unfortunately, but we DO have reusable rockets
>>526237900I actually did. And if you did too, you'd realize how much slop gets pumped out in terms of papers in the scientific world.
>>526238001They why are you impressed by a fucking MAG-LEV, you chimp!?Do you also think Russia is a great country because it has tigers?
>>526238214Anon, you gotta take it easy, western cheerleader shills are absolutely clueless about anything but 10 year old talking points they learned in some telegram channel.
Retarded takeTake a quick look at the modern history of the chinks and you realize we are fucked. Their gen x was poor and agricultural. They moved en masse into cities. Their millenials grew up in brand new cities and went to school. They are the ones who brought about the rise of their high tech industry and it has caught up to the west in only 3 decades. Now their Gen z and alpha not only have much better education but also more tech to build on. The trend is china creating more engineers than we even have total men. We are finished and I predict china to completely surpass us on every field by 10 years. It's only going to snowball from now on.
>>526238731Speaking of retarded takes, did you get your talking points from shittok? If they got so many promising young engineers then you must know the youth unemployment rates they’re currently going through?
>>526237414The opinion writer was in Falun Gong
>>526237414I work with a lot of Chinese people and while they are extremely intelligent and diligent, they are often narrow focused. For example they will often focus on literal interpretations of regulations or rules attempting to satisfy the letter of the law rather than the spirit. This leads to spending way too much time on minutiae and bureaucratic red tape. A lot of the Chinese are on the regulatory side while my team works on the development side, and they will fixate on small errors that have little relevance to the business case or they will not understand the business so cannot even contextualize them. They also tend to be uncomfortable making unilateral decisions without consulting authority, preferring precision over an educated guess.
>>526238606>western cheerleader shillsHe's cheerleading China...But yes, he is spouting the same shit they've been saying for decades...
>>526237414>The USSR was way better at innovation1% as innovative as your rival is not "way better"
