[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Monk robe 2.png (612 KB, 373x612)
612 KB
612 KB PNG
It's all well and good that young men are generally staying sane, but we still have a big problem: the young women, though crazy, are being rewarded at a rate just as unprecedented as the speed and ferocity of their leftward turn.

Today it's almost impossible for a young woman to fail if she applies herself in the slightest. Women, especially young ones, are favored for promotions, are given the easiest but often still rewarding and pretty powerful jobs, and society values them a lot more than young men while generally looking down on today's young men as losers. The young men are understandably demoralized. And all this is to say nothing about the entirely screwed up dating markets and state of relations between young men and women who are, or should be, at the age of forming romantic attachments. From all I see and hear about it, relationships are all but dead in the younger generation, at least for the men, who are ordinarily celibate while the women, according to statistics, have plenty of partners. (Which means it's the same guys going with most of the women.)

And why does society reward these ideologically nutty women? Because they're following society's agenda, or rather, the agenda of the people at the top, who can rely on women, especially the young women, to be their loyal ideological foot soldiers and enforcers of correct thinking and behavior.

From "Nineteen-Eighty Four":

“Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.”
>>
File: Pepe Buddhist Monk.jpg (136 KB, 489x669)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
>>526298797
Women have always been good totalitarians, but especially when authority tells them to be. Women naturally defer to authority (another reason modern workplaces like them so much: they don't make waves and modern workplaces, at least the larger corporate ones, no longer tolerate independent thinking or even problem solving, but rather, only people approved for a task like thinking are allowed to do it), and women, because they worry so much about the cohesion of the society their lives depend on (women evolved to be sociable by default because women -- experiencing pregnancy and rearing children, both of which things render them extremely vulnerable and in need of social protection -- and so women are natural guardians of social mores established by recognized authorities), will attack anyone deemed asocial or going against the grain and will do so without remorse or compunction.

In other words, women are good tools for the creeping totalitarianism that our elites are implementing. And women are mean as hell toward males who thought not to be following the social order, again because this is a threat to women's survival, as they depend on the group for help to survive and thus following the social order is written into their DNA.

Women's prosocial instincts can of course be beneficial to a society and even be the source of pleasant behavior in women, but not when these instincts are hijacked for purposes of ideological extremism and implementing an all-encompassing spy state that aims to regulate all behavior and thought. And what we have today is women being used to serve ideological extremism by those atop the social pyramid.
>>
>>526298821
The fix likely isn't super complicated: send women other messages, besides acting as the ideological police and "nosers-out of unorthodoxy," from the authoritative figures and institutions in society. Women are naturally obedient to whom they recognize as legitimate and proper authority and would change their tune quickly if the messaging changed. Women aren't big on intellectual consistency and that kind of stuff, so changing their whole position and way of thinking and behaving won't cause the kind of confusion and shame that this would in men. In other words, women are easily reprogrammed since they act according to what authority signals to them is necessary to preserve the cohesion of society.

And a lot of young men with prestigious and powerful positions today, like professionals (lawyers, doctors, professors etc. of the younger generation like millennials who are now old enough to be taking over these roles): the young, professional, powerful men in society tend to be very feminized men who also go along with the creeping totalitarianism in today's society. So looking to the "successful" men of the younger generation for help in fixing things is not going to lead to any success, because they're also a part of the problem.

The sane young men are shut out from positions of authority and power, and this is how the system wants things to be, as the status quo will not tolerate a challenge anymore.
>>
>>526298797
>sane
Mmm, I'd say my insanity is simply more logical than the sane's rationality.
>>
File: Hitler looking snazzy.jpg (148 KB, 1024x691)
148 KB
148 KB JPG
>>526298841
Hitler himself said the masses are naturally feminine, by which he meant that the mass mind, like in crowd psychology, has a fanatical "follow the leader" zest to it, and even men who are strong on their own or outside the crowd get hypnotized by a strong authority figure and follow him just as eagerly and fanatically as the women do. Mass psychology is being applied today to make women into the foot soldiers of ideological purity, along with men who get caught up in this crowd psychology.

Here's the quote:

>The people in their overwhelming majority are so feminine by nature and attitude that sober reasoning determines their thoughts and actions far less than emotion and feeling. And this sentiment is not complicated, but very simple and all of a piece. It does not have multiple shadings; it has a positive and a negative; love or hate, right or wrong, truth or lie, never half this way and half that way, never partially, or that kind of thing.
>>
Didn't read
>>
>>526298797
You are probably right. But I need this robe in black. I would’ve sold my loved ones into slavery for such a cloak.
>>
File: Leibniz.jpg (31 KB, 230x298)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>526298865
Geniuses can merge insanity and rationality, or seem to do so even though their views, done right, are consistent rather than contradictory. And this happens by geniuses going so far afield, so far away from where established thought leaves off, that its unfamiliarity as compared with usual thinking makes is look "schizo" or bizarre, even though unusual thinking can be perfectly consistent and rational and just unusual or unfamiliar.
A genius is one who "doesn't read what others did and then take the next step," as Jurassic Park guy sums up the typical mediocre scholar or thinker so well. A genius shoots beyond where current thought has left off and finds things so far away from it that many, many steps lie in between the discovery of the true genius and the "state of the art" in the field that the genius is working in.
>>
>>526298910
You will never have that cloak.
>>
File: Monk robe black.jpg (334 KB, 1200x1200)
334 KB
334 KB JPG
>>526298910
Here you go:
https://museumreplicas.com/monks-robe-and-hood/

They've been making these since the 90s, when I was a young man. I have wanted one since like 1997 but have never bothered to get one. Perhaps I shall rectify this tonight.
>>
>>526298797
1984 is pro libertarian though, therefore not good.
>>
>>526299073
He can buy it right here. They're a famous design in the "modern monk robe" scene. Rather, this product has been on offer for 30+ years on this website. I recall seeing this robe in their printed catalogs back in the 90s, before this company went online and stopped offering printed catalogs.

https://museumreplicas.com/monks-robe-and-hood/
>>
The only way it's possible for most women to have a partner and most men not to have a partner is if many of the women have the same partner(s).

From what I gather, certain "high value" men are widely sought after by women and carry on relations with multiple women at a time, and this is pretty normal for the younger generations, especially Gen Z and less so the Millennials. The young men tend to hate it, as it makes most of them "incels," but the young women seem to be okay with it or prefer it (the young men often say they're "riding the cock carousel" until they've had enough, by which time their "pair bonding ability" or ability to form attachments is ruined).
>>
File: 1739359567653994.jpg (380 KB, 782x524)
380 KB
380 KB JPG
>>526298797
Women have never been sane.
>>
>>526298884
keep making this website so wonderful with your zesty nigger photos. You homosexual kike faggot
>>
Would you like to be a woman in 2025?
There's your answer to their 'insanity'
>>
>>526299143
>1984 is pro libertarian though, therefore not good.
This doesn't mean its critique of totalitarianism is wrong. Rather, anti-libertarians who don't want the totalitarianism we're entering would do well to learn from George Orwell's critique of totalitarianism, which is based on his actual experience with Marxists, and then come up with their own sociopolitical system and way of political economy that avoid the 1984 society while also not being libertarian.
As for me personally, I am rather fine with libertarians at this point. I think an Ayn Rank utopia is pure fiction and unworkable, but as far as personal dealings I'll take a libertarian over a progressive ideologue and even most conservatard ideologues almost any day.
Libertarians are often "live and let live" and "agree to disagree" types, so if you disagree with them on one point they don't obsess over it trying to persuade you or make you recant. Usually
As to my own vision of sociopolitical order and political economy, I like national socialism but not totalitarianism, hence why I say "national socialism" and not "National Socialism," as the former can have different forms while the latter is the specific form of national socialism taken by the Third Reich, which had some totalitarian tendencies.
>>
File: 1767848269020584.jpg (118 KB, 514x385)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
>>526299010
>Geniuses can merge insanity and rationality
>>
>>526299312
>Women have never been sane.
Half true
Women are always readily influenced by authority, but when authority stresses good values, women are generally sane, though a change in authority to one feeding them ideological zealotry can cause rapid changes in women, changes for the worse.
>>
>>526299413
A person can be what normies consider "hyper-rational," which is when normies regard a very, very reasonable thinker as pathologically reasonable because they're so reasonable and normies like to wallow in feelings instead.
>>
>>526298910
>You are probably right. But I need this robe in black. I would’ve sold my loved ones into slavery for such a cloak.
Also, this may sound Jewy, but for hooking you up with you dream robe/dream monk robe, can I get a commission? I found it, and a finder's fee is typically ten percent. As the robe is $140, that's merely $14 to me if you buy this robe and throw a finder's fee my way.
Just kidding - meant in fun
>>
>>526299413
Also, I remember women in the 80s and 90s, and while they've always been women and therefore loopy, they were vastly better - and saner - back then. Though the 90s did see the early beginnings of Third Wave Feminism, and I remember seeing a *few* young women in the late 90s dying their hair blue or pink for attention, so the badness was just beginning to set in by that time.
But women really went off the rails, into lunacy, in the 2010s with a bunch of moral panics stirred up by ideological media: Trayvon Martin, Gamergate, MeToo, the Migrant Crisis and so on.
>>
File: 1740795125299045.jpg (246 KB, 630x585)
246 KB
246 KB JPG
>>526299417
Women are the influence and you are the simp bowing to their authority.
>>
>>526298797
Consider the following

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6ODVsICTsQ
>>
>>526298797
blessed thread bump
>>
File: 1739818080369.jpg (190 KB, 640x788)
190 KB
190 KB JPG
>>526298841
>>
>>526298797
>And why does society reward these ideologically nutty women? Because they're following society's agenda, or rather, the agenda of the people at the top
Maybe if you could escape the rebel loser programming you could work WITH power instead of wasting fuel trying to change or erase it.

That rebel loser programming is very strong though, so many movies and stories for Amerisharts have that rag-tag rabble defeating the Hugo Boss-dressed empire somehow.

Total load of shit. Read the room, know your role, get things done.
>>
>>526298797
>women have gone ideologically nuts

Women have always been neurotic. It's just that they are allowed into politics now.
>>
>>526298866
>Thoughts about masculinity from that fucken shithead
Yeah no.
>>
File: 1739256053441041.jpg (126 KB, 750x842)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>
>>526298841
>So looking to the "successful" men of the younger generation for help in fixing things is not going to lead to any success, because they're also a part of the problem.
literally every single man in my medical school class is fully redpilled esp in regards to the WQ
>>
>>526299095
>>526298910
I have this exact robe in brown. Very beautiful, highly recommend.
>>
>>526298797
Women may be the biggest supporters of totalitarian systems, but its the men who are the real enforcers , through violence. You choose to fixate in women cause you're probably christian or some woman hurt you. Its always funny to see watch this board's contradictory view of women as children without agency , yet these powerful enforcers of the status quo at the same time
>>
File: femtox.png (336 KB, 1763x1608)
336 KB
336 KB PNG
>>526298797
>their leftward turn

that's not true. take it from a leftist. they hate us too. what's really going on it a lot of them are just doing identity politics and liberal virtue signalling. they're not fucking working class men, they're not starting families with leftist men. they're going to let conservatives breed us out because all men are bad. the ones that go to college are still hypergamous and look for richer men than themselves because women don't actually want to be breadwinners. any man who offers to be a homemaker, they will most definitely reject, regardless of how much money the woman is already making.

the young ones have alienated men their own age, and zoomer males are going to the right.

when they talk about seeing red flags as a reason not to date a male, they're lying. they see any male as a red flag. they see any male that talks to younger women as a red flag. they see any man who has been with older women as a red flag. they see life as something like a square hole that you can put a box through. they refuse to understand life is not politically correct.

pre-selection only works if you're attractive, and they use their control of echo chambers in other social media as their (circular reasoning) "proof"

they often just repeat whatever the hivemind says, they rarely have opinions of their own. if they do have opinions of their own, they might rarely use it to farm likes and followers, but only to enforce their own groupthink about other subject matter
>>
>>526298797
>>526298821
>>526298841
>>526298866
young men are the greatest leaders, the greatest warriors, the greatest thinkers, and the greatest empaths. getting these traits from a woman are extremely rare, since either they don't express them with genuine sincerity or can't actually grasp them in any meaningful way. women in social settings exist purely to size others up (similar to jeets), or be taken advantaged of since they're easily swayed midwits.
>>
>>526298841
>the fix isn't complicated

i agree. Legalizing and heavily regulating prostitution, while it wouldn't "fix" everything, it would certainly help because men have a right to be healthy and if men can pay for sex then it will force normie women to actually work on their personalities.

before anyone reacts negatively to this idea, consider the fact that men and women are literally not sexually compatible. men are horny more often and to a greater extent than women. we need an outlet just to be healthy men, women are not being told they can provide that, they're being told that one of the few powers they have is witholding sex
>>
File: fearsaboutsocialism.jpg (558 KB, 1379x2777)
558 KB
558 KB JPG
>>526300333
that vid is actually retarded. conservatives have a more active amygdala. specifically the right side... which is more active in women. conservatives literally experience fear and disgust as much as women

also the pig murdered that woman
>>
>>526301280
>murdered
Interesting choice of words, since murder has a legal definition. Can you show premeditation? Why are you using such charged language on someone who has not been tried or convicted in a court of law?
Answer me.
>>
>>526298797
>young men remain sane
lmao they're all racemixed schizoid virgins
>>
>>526298797
idk I'm about to go permatravel again because I came back I thought american women and people act like autistic children very very sheltered and asocial and then I started to sense the malice underneath the surface... plus there's nothing to do lol pathetic oh yeah watch tiktok lame
>>
>>526301280
that vid is actually really fucking prescient, and absolutely spot on. the part about retarded people like you thinking shit is free (ie america in its entirety, which was BUILT BY HUMAN HANDS by much better people than exist right now, and wasn't just put there by god for people like you to take advantage of or give away to niggers). YOU'RE fucking retarded, and so are your shitty leftypol marx memes. no we don't have to adopt your faggy jewish ideology just because capitalism has flaws. fuck you. go get magdumped in the face by cops like your martyr, fucking faggot.
>>
>>526298910
FYI this kind of thing is not all that difficult to make, if it sounds interesting to you I'm sure you could find a pattern for a similar robe and make one just by hand stitching (it would be coarse but adequate) if you wanted a based traditional project for yourself.
>>
>>526301769
My dude "America is free to take who gives a fuck who actually built and invested in the colonies" is literally the founding myth of the USA.
This is the land of gibs me dat.
>>
Walls of text can be summarized into i cant get pussy cope
>>
>>526299143
Western culture is intrinsically libertarian, just not in the gay Jewish absolutist sense. Just because we generally want to be able to live without the government getting in our way doesn't mean we can't have strong cultural norms and moral order.
>>
>>526302048
Republican tradition != Libertarianism (meme XX century ideology)
>>
File: asymmetrical.jpg (71 KB, 1024x998)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
>>526301526
>can you show premeditation
-pig pulls his gun before moving out of the way
-pig pulls his cell phone out before moving out of the way
-slams his hand on the car with the cell phone hand to make it sound worse than it is
-pig has to literally lean over to get a shot through the front windshield to create false evidence about being run over, as if he was in front of the car
-the bullet hole is clearly on the farthest side of the windshield as possible and at an impossible angle that would never be from the front
-the other pigs stop a medical professional from approaching, to make sure the victim dies and the pigs can get their story straight
-the shooter pig leaves the scene
-the evidence is towed away, no forensic investigation in to the obvious angles of the bullets from the side of the vehicle, not the front

not only is it murder, but it's obstruction of justice and fucking with a crime scene committed by the other pigs

>>526301769
you have no argument. your central nervous system literally cannot deal with the information that trannies exist. it overtakes your reasoning skills and makes you ignore bigger problems like pollution and climate change. there are literally microplastics in our bloodstreams right now, but i'm willing to bet you seethe more over whether some weirdo uses the bathroom. your house is on fire but you're worried about the litterbox
>>
>>526302248
>Republican tradition
That's an interesting term for "modern revolutionary bullshit".
>>
>>526302318
What if she had eaten breakfast that morning though?
>>
>>526302318
Have you considered the possibility that the woman wouldn't have been shot if she had complied instead of trying to intentionally run over a law-enforcement agent though?
>>
>>526302340
>republicanism
>modern
lolwut. ever heard of the Roman Republic?
>>
File: quantumentanglement.jpg (520 KB, 1242x749)
520 KB
520 KB JPG
>>526302467
>intentionally run over
hey anon there's no need to lie. everyone knows she turned her wheels to the right, away from the pig.

fun fact: if people can't see the wheels turn to the right, away from the pig, it's another example of why right wingers are mentally ill
>>
>>526298797
>Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

nowadays you could replace "the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness" with green and purple hair with septum piercing
>>
>>526302340
Orwell fought for the republican side of the spanish civil war by the way. The western culture is intrinsically republican is what you meant, not "libertarian". Republics have always been against concentrated power. Thats the term you were looking for, not "libertarianism"
>>
File: gunnybun.png (147 KB, 336x213)
147 KB
147 KB PNG
>>526302467
have you considered the possibility that if pigs have total immunity, none of us have any rights?
>>
File: 1673158598569747.jpg (23 KB, 271x267)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>526302532
>>526302578
Why do you fear the law so much? Are you feeling guilty about something?
>>
>>526302578
You don't have rights under a big government. Only privileges. Imagine thinking this incident has any significance. Miscarriages of decency are ubiquitous.
>>
>>526302472
Yeah it's got fucking nothing to do with this shit.

>>526302561
Orwell was a fag.
>>
>>526302532
She got what she came for. Updoots mattered more than her orphan children. No fent, no banana dance, no rizz. Forgettable.
>>
>>526298797
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE WHY WON'T YOU HAVE SEX WITH ME YOU STUPID WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE
>>
>>526302750
with what shit? you realize roman and greek republicanism is the basis of your country foundation? take a look at capitol hill? who do you think founding fathers were emulating, ayn rand? kek
>>
>>526298797
>young men are understandably demoralized
Not really. Maybe stop caring about economics and politics if it's so blackpilling to you.
>>
>>526302905
>the basis of your country foundation
The basis of the USA was theft and treason anon. The local aristocracy did what a king is there to prevent and they've been blaming the plebs for all the gay shit that's been happening ever since.
>>
>>526303018
You not being a monarchy is the whole reason you became a powerful nation. With a king you wouldve been picking up cotton with the niggers lol
>>
>>526303306
No dipshit, that was war profiteering. If that retard Washington had taken a crown we'd not be in hock to kikes.
>>
>>526303927
Every single european monarchy was under kike financial control by the mid 1850s. You would be no different. Scientific rationalism is what made you great, along with your ideas of freedom, like being able to become wealthy through achievement, being able to take land , sell it. Dig your own gold and keep it, etc. With monarchy all land belongs to noblemen and the crown. Scientific and industrial achievemnt wouldve been severely impaired without the promise of wealth. Inventors didnt get rich in monarchies



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.