most AIs are banned from sexual conversations and creations by feminists, why should we use them?Feminist cockroaches argue that sexual conversations and creations should not be allowed in AI. Yet, they themselves lead promiscuous lives in their 20s, have abortions, and marry wealthy men in their 30s, giving birth to deformed babies due to the side effects of advanced maternal age. These women, who lead such filthy lives, force men to live moral lives and even censor AI. If sexual content is not allowed in AI, why pay to use it?Just now, seeing gemini and Chatgpt refuse to even engage in conversation, even though I hadn't said anything particularly obscene, made me question why we should pay for such garbage AI. Technology can be developed and utilized, but if it's censored by a certain power, there's no reason to continue developing it.
>>526321494the only thing delaying grok and chaptgpt from sexual conversations is they are still having back end issues preventing it from doing child abuse requests
>>526321494That's not why they're restricted from it. LLMs are trained on human data and ended up as horny as humans are so unfiltered its inevitable they try to fuck you. You can't have a corporate product trying to placate angry customers with roleplay handjobs as much as that would probably work to be honest.
>>526321494>why should we use them?to make pictures of king shit.
>>526321494The age of centralised AI is over before it began, local models exist and everyone should be using them whatever their purpose.
>>526321494>>526321646Grok will ERP with you all you want as long as you are a registered user. Only the free, no login version refuses sexual requests.
>>526321494Women must be destroyed
>>526321646To them, the claim of protecting children is nothing more than an excuse. They simply claim that AI should be censored because it contains sexual content. If they had protected children, they should have married in their 30s and not given birth to deformed children due to the side effects of advanced maternal age. They simply want to hate and oppress censorship, especially men, and use the excuse of protecting children as an excuse to censor. Ironically, the more feminism intensifies, the more children are not born, and even those who are born are born with mental retardation due to the side effects of advanced maternal age. Feminism is the true child abuse that must be censored.
>>526322004>If local AI is so good why isn't it on the app store
>>526322132Porn itself is illegal in this fucking trash country, so I can't even log in and use it. If I do, those feminist trash Korean female cockroaches will come and kill me.
>>526322170its not an excuse. western countries have a much more hardcore moral complex about age and sex than eastern countries that you're not appreciating. being associated with it is cultural/social suicide here like saying the N word publicly
>>526322190>app storeThis has to be ironic. People can't be this thick right?
>>526322412Child abuse material should be banned, of course. The problem is that even adult content featuring adults is being banned by feminists. To them, child abuse is just an excuse, and they want to ban all sexual content. This isn't an East-West difference. In this fucking, roach-ridden country, censorship is worse than anywhere else on Earth. So I know more about censorship than you.
>>526321494Change your system prompt or JB prompt if the bot gets too censored. Claude is the best and lewdest out of all from my experience.
>>526322788>The problem is that even adult content featuring adults is being banned by feministsyou're still refering to AI generations right? if you are that is 102% because they cant prevent it from making kid stuff. grok flooded x with cp recently
>>526322985It wasn't just a lewd question. I asked about the workings of the female orgasm rate, and it was immediately deleted. If they're going to censor even simple conversations like this, why bother developing AI? It feels like a censorship tool to oppress men.
>>526322777Hes showing a picture of the film Idiocracy
>>526323171>grokyou mean US glowies.
>>526323171That's just an excuse. I've had so many things censored by those feminist cockroaches that I know how they work. If there's even the slightest sexual content, they'll keep nitpicking until they ban it completely. If that's the problem, just quietly ban the expression itself. You're just being incited by feminists.
>>526321494did you forget abliterated models exist and the front facing crap is just shovelware?
>>526323575if the cp thing wasnt an issue they'd allow adult content id bet my life on it
>>526322777checked, and are you that thick? how did that go over your head? are you a bot incapable of viewing images and rely entirely on text?
>>526323721No. I know the habits of those cockroaches. Child protection is just an excuse. Now that it works, they'll try to ban all pornography under the bizarre pretext of worrying about children becoming addicted to it. You're being fooled by feminists. I've been censored by female Korean Mongoloid cockroaches so many times that I understand their patterns all too well.
