so these are just e-waste now, right?
>>526325961we might be able to sell some to China for their reverse-engineering?aside that, yeah I guess so
>>526327744They'll be able to build them much cheaper and at the same or better quality.
>>526328155I doubt that but they might find some ways to counter it if they tear it apart
>>526325961Always was without the rest of digital battlefield system. Any foreign customers need to integrate the system to their own. And if the rest are just radars and outdated messaging..
Interceptors are obsolete but we need a real war to find that out just like how Ukraine showed that tanks are obsolete. All you need is submarines, drones, and ballistic missiles
>>526328415Caveat: I supposed interceptors are useful for shooting down a missile on its upward trajectory , but you don’t need a fleet of them
>>526327744this, just give them to Chinayou have no idea how hard this would make the mutts seethe
>>526328500Energy weapons from space are better for this.
>>526325961Why don't you join us and japan. We're building a 6th gen fighter without the mutts. You'd be more than welcome.
>>526328920Japan was not allowed to produce. It has to be produced in the US
>>526329176The joint Jap/UK/Italian Mitsubishi F-X / Tempest program is not going to be built in the US.
