Are you ready for the first black man to lane on the Moon (filmed from an AI data center)?
>>526346866They aren't landing on the moon just orbiting it
>AYO WHERE DAT MOON ATWill the spaceship have rims and reek of weed smoke?
>>526346866I'm pretty worried about this. Boeing hardware , NASA facing budget cuts. The one thing that surely leads to failure in space is inadequate money. Look at all the recent failed unmanned attempts to land on the moon cheap.
>>526346997On a tangent, has anyone ever researched the blast bunker underneath NASA’s Apollo and Shuttle launch pad? The whole premise of it is that if there’s a disaster on the launchpad, crews and astronauts can take this elaborate chute down into an underground bunker beneath the launch pad to hopefully survive any blast. However, does this really make sense? If the rocket explodes on the pad chances are you’re done before you even knew what happened. Is there really going to be time to escape? Secondly, the bunker is highly over engineered and could support a crew for a couple weeks. That just seems a little too extreme. I suspect the true purpose of the bunker was for Apollo astronauts to quietly leave the rocket after they had been secured away in the public’s view, and hang out for several days after launch when they could be let out. >https://youtu.be/89zdHsb2pWU
>>526346866Imagine still believing this shit imagine being retarded enough to STILL believe space shit
fucking retards believe this shit
>>526347321Anon please be gentle, they've just recently discovered how to read. They're trying their best.
I tend toward the "We Landed On The Moon" camp, simply because there are no repercussions if you deny it. Unlike..Other historical incidents.
>>526346866>to lane on the Moonare you writing in niggerspeak already?
>>526346866Integrity to HoustonReceiving you Integrity, is everything alright?Houston, was there anything sent ahead of us?Negative Integrity, what's the issueHouston we're seeing some activity on the Moon....
>>526347358This is Jewish theater. When scientific missions are just reality TV, then you know NASA is a studio rather than a government agency.
>>526346866First rapes in space!
https://litter.catbox.moe/2qaugn.pdf
>>526346997Oh neat it's 1968 again. If you ever want to do something truly depressing, go visit the Johnson Space Center in Houston. It reeks of past accomplishment that was followed up with selling t-shirts and not much else.
<<<<-----kek 2017Moon landing:>there and back in a week in the sixties when we didn't even have a pocket calculator>no other country has done it, ever>can't do it today, b/c we 'lost the technology'>12 pics and 4 rocks from the entire trip>press conference with astronauts was the most damning, all three were sheepish and embarrassed>still today with advanced photography, can't take a clear image of the flag we supposedly left there>the data tapes were erased and reused due to a data tape shortage in the 80s lol>and the other 300 pieces of evidence about lighting, tracks, shadows, lack of stars, etc.
I wonder why they faked itI’m guessing:1) to make america look superior2) to get rich3) to make themselves look smart4) to get more funding5) to gain support due to morale fading from a lengthy Vietnam war6) to unite Americans7) to see how stupid the public is for future fleecingThe handful of people that participated probably believed at the time that it was more important to have morale to unite Americansalso, it is embarrassing to realize you yourself were duped (radio and video signals were sent separately to NASA, the engineers would really have no part, they are just receiving signal)it would’ve put NASA out of business, tooit is not believable and the longer we go without anyone else even coming close to doing it, the more fake it looks
>>526354558I went there a month ago and can confirm along with it being insanely expensive. Seeing the rockets up close was cool though.
>>526355029>gain support due to morale fadingthe Apollo program began in 1961. (Americans didn't know what or where Vietnam was until 1964-65)Are (You) the fedanon Federal Reserve poster? If so, being a manned moonlanding denier does you no favors
>>526346997They aren't even orbiting it a la Apollo 8, they're just flying by the Moon.
>>526356565no one in science thinks we went to the moonand i mean no onewe laugh at astrophysicists in academiathey have more theory than dataeveryone knows it was a frauda seven hour compilation on a VCR tape went around our entire department showing hours upon hours of compelling evidencewhy do you think i am fedanon?
>>526351250>studio rather than a government agency.why not both? There was nothing of value on the moon to begin with. Space age is a meme you start "mining" precious metals you devalue them and they are no longer precious. >let's just fucking annihilate the world economy smash our own monopolies lmao
>>526347358I was on the team that was reviewing the test data and reports for the launch abort system (the bit that gets the crew away from the rocket if SHTF). Was. I was moved to another project after I kept pointing out the contractor was taking shortcuts and their tests didn't actually prove they met the requirements because our job was just to rubber-stamp everything because "that's how it was done before". I don't have much confidence in this anymore.
>>526356565>being a manned moonlanding believer* does you no favorsftfyno one with any intelligence thinks we went to the moononly people that want to believe that dolittle boys that stare out their window at night
>>526357212and fucking NASA looking for funding
>>526356920>>526357212>fedanonBecause (You) are using pics and filenames with his formattingManned moonlanding deniers are sub-50 IQ brainletsEach new post by (You) itt lowers global IQ
>>526346997imagine simping for a space rock
