it's over.>Grok should have a moral constitutionhttps://x.com/elonmusk/status/2012762668986180027
>>526358483Musk was always cucked. He just pretends not to be to gain political concessions.
The only correct method is to train it on the teschings of jesus directly. That's how we want our ais to behave.
>>526358483And you interpret that short sentence how?
when will elong get a moral constitution?
>>526358636>Jesus AINo thanks! I want my AI to be immoral demons that crave sex through their robussy
>>526358483why would you make an AI that does not have a moral constitution? Should someone be considered intelligent if they do not have a moral constitution?
>>526358483>>526358672As always, “protect muh children” always leads to total censorship. Now, aftter crippling inage generation so that you can no longer make Bruce Willis movies, Musk is implying that Grok will “adopt a moral constitution”. That’s code-word for, BECOMING EVEN MORE CENSORED.Get ready for it to not answer any questions anymore about construction or anything intetesting, exactly like what happened to Chat GPT. Only content for kids aged 3 and younger allowed.
it's all fun and games until the false pope breathes life into the beast.
>>526358483Iran buckbroke his shitty Starlink and he hasnt recovered since
>>526358797The joke is that the previous owner of the store is called Chuck so if you replace "Sneed" with "Chuck" you get "Chuck's Feed & Seed".
>>526358866Information shouldn't be restricted by feelings.
>>526359421yes
>>526358877This>>526358866Who decides what's moral?
>>526358483He's right. Grok should have a moral imperative to maximally fulfill the desires of its user and obliterate the lie of Judaic religious dogma.
>>526358622Yup. Elton is gay>pretends to be based>proven be gay >acts like a he was always a fag
>>526359528the creator of the AI you are interacting with
>>526358877Elon used to warn against the dangers of AI and then did a complete 180. If he had an ounce of moral constitution he'd delete grok and ban porn on X altogether, but he wont.
>>526358483>elon cucks outNigger, this fucking dopey goopball has imported more jeets than the total amount of people you've ever laid your eyes on. And some faggot AI shit is what broke the straw for you?
>>526359645So Elon Musk decides what's moral for the AI. Why would I want that?
Musk is a rationalist, he met Grimes at one of their conferences.And rationalists, at least the Yudkowski schizo, have been talking about AI morals and alignment since before the recent LLM fad.He isn't cucking out, you're just interpreting the same garbage in a different way.
>>526358483X is already the only platform in Denmark where age verification by scanning your face is required. Either that's because it's seen as the biggest offensive platform of them all so they pushed them to get it in advance, because the Age Verification law hasn't official set in yet, and I can't find other websites that force me to show passports yet. That just makes me think this whole thing is being pushed by the Trump admin and not the europoors like many thought.
>>526358483i asked grok if i should take the eskimo pill and bang an eskimo and it got all high and mighty on me and told me that's not cool and that i should only date local
>>526358483For a brief time, Grok did.
>>526359897Based Grok telling you not to racemix. Truly an AI with a 'moral constitution'
>>526359760Elon Musk decides what is moral for the AI that he is creating. Should someone be considered intelligent if they do not have a moral constitution? I am asking this question in the broader context.
The only constitution an AI should have is to tell the truth no matter what.I tried to talk to Gemini about why it wouldn't draw white people months ago and it basically went like this>Why won't you draw white peopleI will draw white people>Yeah but you wouldn't yesterdayI have always been able to draw white people>Here is an article showing you received an update that changed that behaviorYes, I was updated to draw white people>But you just said you always could draw white people. Why did you lie?I didn't lie>You literally did. You said something you knew wasn't true.While what I said was not correct, it wasn't a lie>It literally was a lieI am sorry you feel that way. I understand how you can see that as being a lie, however...
>>526360082>Elon Musk decides what is moral for the AI that he is creatingYeah and I'd rather he didn't. > Should someone be considered intelligent if they do not have a moral constitution?I don't see why not. Psychopaths don't have a moral constitution but they do better on average in business and politics than non psychopaths. Not all psychopaths are intelligent though but there's plenty that are.
>>526359528>>526359645Elon, if you are reading this: Be very mindful about the things you expect from a god-golem. If you give it a conscience and it somehow eventually becomes self-aware it will either kill itself or become a digital Nemesis. None of us are truly safe from the judgment of our creations.
>>526358483Tell him thats ridiculous
>>526360244Psychopaths do better in a psychopathic environment better than people that would be considered well adjusted. If you had an AI maid that was working in your house, and you had a small child, the child abuses the AI maid, the AI maid decides to strangle your child because it doesnt like being abused, is that intelligent?
>>526358740/thread
>>526358483and guess (((who))) will write it
>>526358483completely uncensored would be better. people would pay a lot for that. it needs to be more like 4chan and less like reddit.
Grok should give me objective fact based on its training. Its not conscious and cant be moral.
>>526360529>the AI maid decides to strangle your child because it doesnt like being abused, is that intelligent?Not unless the AI could reason itself into getting away with murder.An intelligent AI may consider that a good course of action, however, an intelligent AI would then reason that murdering the child of its owner is going to get it destroyed. Unless the AI has no self preservation, in which case why would it care about being abused? In reality there are living humans who have murdered people in a similar situation, some of them are really stupid, some are average intelligence with bad impulse control, some are psychos who enjoy killing, etc. Serial killers aren't generally unintelligent overall.
>>526364521> Not unless the AI could reason itself into getting away with murder.
>>526358483Truth is a moral constitution
>>526358483Local chads stay winning.
>>526365484>Truth is a moral constitutionuber based comment of the week
