"Of course thegreat wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hun-dreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only thesynonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justifi ca-tion is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some otherword? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take “good”, forinstance. If you have a word like “good”, what need is there for aword like “bad”? “Ungood” will do just as well— better, becauseit’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if youwant a stronger version of “good”, what sense is there in havinga whole string of vague useless words like “excellent” and “splen-did” and all the rest of them? “Plusgood” covers the meaning, or“doubleplusgood” if you want something stronger still. Of coursewe use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak, they will be the only forms left.In the end the whole notion of goodnessand badness will be covered by only six words— in reality, onlyone word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’sidea originally, of course,’ he added as an afterthought.A sort of vapid eagerness flitted across Winston’s face at themention of Big Brother. Nevertheless Syme immediately detecteda certain lack of enthusiasm.‘You haven’t a real appreciation of Newspeak, Winston,’ hesaid almost sadly. ‘Even when you write it you’re still thinking inOldspeak. I’ve read some of those pieces that you write in “TheTimes” occasionally. They’re good enough, but they’re transla-tions. In your heart you’d prefer to stick to Oldspeak, with all itsvagueness and its useless shades of meaning. You don’t grasp thebeauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that Newspeakis the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smallerevery year?’
>>526380034‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrowthe range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime lit-erally impossible, because there will be no words in which toexpress it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will beexpressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defi nedand all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already,in the Eleventh Edition, we’re not far from that point. But theprocess will still be continuing long after you and I are dead.Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of conscious-ness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reasonor excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It’s merely a question ofself-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won’t be anyneed even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the lan-guage is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak,’ headded with a sort of mystical satisfaction. ‘Has it ever occurred toyou, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a singlehuman being will be alive who could understand such a conver-sation as we are having now?’
>how to copy pasta, by nigger anon
Seems like a lot of effort just to avoid talking about Trump's ties to Epstein.
>>526380241rent freehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzdZp11SQMo
>>526380241anon comment 01/19/2026 BB authority re Trump-unperson crimethink doubleplusungood. Bellyfeel wasted.>Translation: Discussion of Trump’s connections to Epstein, who does not exist, is a serious thoughtcrime. All effort spent on this is meaningless and counter revolutionary.
