Next is Sean Connery, and then Pierce Brosnan. Jeff Bezos is going to ruin the legendary series
>>526383292You can't ruin James Bond. It's been rebooted in half a dozen shitty forms already. Nobody cares, they just won't watch if it's bad
>>526383292He is good... but better as a suave ganster like in Layer Cake. I need Pierce Brosnan back or someone similar.
James Bond was never a real person
>>526383292I have total faith in Bezos successfully refreshing IPs for modern audiences
james bond was never good
>starring Nick Fuentes as Jeffery Epstein
>>526383292>>/tv/
>>526383292Sam Mendes already ruined it when he turned Daniel Craig's Bond into yet another iteration of the Jewish Moshiach Azazel. Skyfall and Spectre are the "Masonic Bonds", filmed and premiered at the Grand Lodge in London.
>>526383292Johnny Vegas will always be the best Bond
>>526383292Roger Moore was the best Bond.Nobody does it betterMakes me feel sad for the rest
he is not bad, but it seems the old method where networks held their stars basically in captivity or under guard, promoted the movie star instead of the character, listening to james bond, off set, in some shitty interview complain about how hard training was ruined the magic. networks had on site houses for big name stars to live in the talent came to them for extravagant parties behind massive gates this new shit where stars all rent the same 50 houses and party in the same ever expanding radius is diluting the pool and forcing the industry to rely on charcters instead of actor for fear the actor dresses funny or is not a perfect image for their brand because they are stretch too thin and too fragile to exsit in the real world.
>>526383477checkedhe was based on john dee who was a real personyou retarded cunt
>>526384031>>526383731Ocotber 14..
>>526384158Oh. Neat.
>>526383292Craig was literally the reason the new Bond films are so cucked. He’s the reason he barely even sleeps around anymore. Only Casino Royale was good, everything else was trash. Saying that Craig was a good Bond or the “closest to the book Bond” is the most reddit tier opinion one can have. Connery>Brosnan>Dalton>Moore>Lazenby>Craig.
>>526383292Nah Daniel Craig has always been the serious and unsophisticated brute force Bond All the historical Bonds were more debonair and playful.
>>526384179damn
>>526384179Died in the same town as the zoomer night club.
>>526384031I agree. Grew up with Roger. Right proper bloke
>>526383731https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLSF7_1r2qQ
>>526383292>In my opinion Daniel Craig is the definitive James Bond
>>526383292nah Pierce clears
>>526383292Your "definitive" James Bond had a gay cum kiss scene with the twink from Dune.Neither of them are serious actors. None of their performances were memorable. He is literally a faggot jew larping as a white guy.
>>526383292Craig is realistic, kinda. But too fit and obvious. Real spies aren't standing out as exceptionally fit people, except whore honey traps.That's why Connery is the true GOAT. Plus he exhibits the fantasy spy life. He fucked 4 to 5 hotties per movie. Craig falls in love with lying cheating whores and gets all broken up about it.
>>526383292Dalton is the definitive Bond who played the character closest to how Fleming wrote him and was doing all the "dark n moody" Craig stuff 25 years before Craig. Craig was good though.
>>526386072I think Dalton was the first Bond actor to have read all the books
>>526384031Roger Moore has been cancelled due to improper age gap relationships.
The Craig Bond continuity legitimately got worse with each successive film.No Time to Die was outright putrid. It needed to be an hour and a half shorter, and the plot was just a masterclass of simping and cuckery.
I haven't seen a James Bond film since the 90's and the only way they could get new interested in watching a new one is if they made in a period piece set in the 60's during the cold war.
Here's the QRD for you fucking retards.#1 Connery, OG Bond#2 Moore, whacky funny, 70's Bond#3 Lazenby Bad actor but goofy enough to be likeable#4 Dalton. 80's cocaine, wow who cares.#5 Brosnan, weakest writing. production value and acting of any James Bond by far. #6 Daniel Craigenberg>Hello fellow Bonds.
Craig was an awful bond.Why do you losers always have the word takes on everything?
>>526388281I tried a rerun of all Bond movies in order some time ago. I got stuck with Roger Moore's Bonds and had to quit; that's how bad he was.Might be because the scripts hit all time lows - there was a reason that Connery had quit you know.
>>526386072Agree on Dalton, best bond.Craig is to modern, removes the romantism of spycraft etc, even if its not real, its the identity of bond and theme.
