real question: what can actually fix the global housing crisis without nuking someone important? because to make prices fall you’d have to hurt banks, funds and boomer landlords; rezone cities, tax empty units, kill speculation and accept that “home values” crash; governments won’t do it because they live off bubble taxes; boomers won’t accept it because housing is their retirement; blaming immigrants is lazy cope — remove them tomorrow and rents stay high because the problem is financialization. so what’s the real endgame here: real reform that pisses off the owners, or permanent rent-only life until younger generations just give up?
Brazil is going to be depopulated by terror attack in its cities
Depopulate
>>526395617>blaming immigrants is lazy cope — remove them tomorrow and rents stay high because the problem is financializationIt's worth a try, and certainly would be a step in the right direction. If it turns out to not be worth it, we can always let them back in later.
>>526395617>increased demand due to mass immigration>lack of supply due to shortage of workers because everybody wants to be white collar>spiking energy and commodity prices due to "green" policiesthe housing prices are appropriate considering the circumstances.
>>526395617Yes you in essence have to end capitalism to fix this>blaming immigrants is lazy cope — remove them tomorrow and rents stay high because the problem is financializationThey're 100% part of the problem, both in the direct sense of taking up more of the limited supply of housing but also in creating ethnic ghettos that squeeze the natives into smaller and smaller enclaves where they actually feel comfortable living and raising children. The solution is as usual national socialism
>>526395617>remove them tomorrow and rents stay high because the problem is financializationThis ignores every known thing about supply and demand.
