I'm writing this to the passerby intellectual left-wing activist who may or may not be visiting our humble forum to learn what makes the right wing tick (or how to unravel right-wing populism, as the case may be).First: One problem we encounter (are plagued by?), jointly, when trying to have "cross-aisle dialogue" is the problem of plebian perspectives and narratives. Recognize that it is abundantly easy to characterize the "other side" by its most reactionary and simple-minded elements. You have millions of blabber-mouthed, trailer park dwelling rural white idiots at your fingertips. We, vast swarms of inner-city sloths and shameless ladder-climbing illigals at which to sling our vitriol. Neither can be ignored outright if you're seeking to find the fuel beneath the flames. But if you want to find the men with the matchbooks, here we are. Can we chat about it?Second: You never get the primary candidates you really want. Yeah? Almost like the system conspires against it? Us, too. Trump says the magic words to the right-wing plebian masses. That's his superpower. But he isn't our guy. And, I suspect, neither is Bernie yours.Third: I could spell out what I perceive when I cast my gaze in your direction but, instead, I'll offer you the authority you deserve therein and tell you what I really know: the intellectual right wing perspective. All of public political discourse tends to be value-system impedance masquerading as a fight over vaporware epistemology. In simpler terms: we disagree about what counts as good and evil then attempt to prove to eachother that some course of action moves in furtherance of it or doesn't. It's utterly pointless. You aren't really "talking politics" with someone until you find a place of agreement about shared values and value system hierarchies.Fourth: The most obvious disagreement we have, at the surface level, is about the relative value of fairness and freedom.[fairly simple stuff so far; more to come]
>>526428652No one cares nigger
>>526428652how does this further dissemination of the jews and their crimes and hasten the inevitable destruction of pissrael.?
>>526428806>hasten the inevitable destruction of pissrael.?It doesn't. The Israel project, as you pointed out, is destined to end. Many European and Israeli jewish intellectuals have said so in thinly veiled terms, publicly.>no important natural resources>a tiny footprint of barely-arable agricultural land>no industrial infrastructure>exports intellectual property licenses>demographically and culturally poisoned to the max>run by self-interested Slavic jews>surrounded by militarized sworn enemiesNo need to hasten anything. But plenty of need to prepare for the post-judeo global world order. Hence this thread.
>>526428738>No one cares niggerPost back of hand with brown maple leaf.
>>526428652>Fourth (cont): I observe, as you do, that relatively few men encounter a drastic political transformarion after their mid twenties or thereabouts. Instead, supporting my earlier statements, most arrive at their persistent *core value system* by the age of twenty and any changes thereafter have to do with changing attitudes about how to best serve those same values. And so be it. Can we agree upon and operate under this understanding?>Fifth: What gives rise to values then? How do we build such different systems of "good and bad" from the same cultural fabric? That's easy to explain, actually.(continued...)
>>526428652The left is always collectivist. They will never vote for a real third party
>>526430365Your first problem with this is, that you categorize left and right as some value clusters. Which could be only said in some widest sense, where right is pro hierarchy and left pro equality, abd even then most people or even ideologies would be scatteted on a spectre. So even different ideologies that are considered left or right are offten based on different values.
