Why do third-world countries (Russia, China, India N.Korea etc) use language in such a 'colourful' manner? What is it about these cultures that encourages use of 'flowery' syntax?For example, English-speaking countries may refer to a military operation as having "neutralised several enemy combatants, and extracted four hostages" whereas Eastern countries will describe the same situation as "glorious soldiers of the revolution put down the rabid dogs of rebellion and rescued the helpless from peril". What causes this? I am genuinely curious.
>>526444595This strikes me as more a specifically North Korean thing, here's your (You) though nafotranny
>>526444595western nations prefer to reserve flowry speech for niggers
>>526444595retardation. being able to clearly make a point and logically structure thoughts is a sign of inteligence.these shitskins hide behind 'muh poetic language' as massive cope.the more a language claims to be 'the most beautiful', or 'theres so many nuances you just cant undertand', you knwo they're fucking dumb
>>526444595Russia does not a flowery language. WTF you talking about. It’s straight to the point and take out unnecessary words like “the.” “I go to store. Get food. Hungry!”
