You tell me. This was taken 23 years ago with a digital camera. You know it does look like the ambience is warmer. I can't put my finger on it though.
>>526527910Something something micronova
>>526527910Looks comfy
>>526527910It's called white balance. The house at the bottom right with the white facade has been taken as the 'white'. The rest follows from that.
>>526527910The sun's gonna give ya a blowjob and then burn all the kikes
>>526527910Yeah it was the sun and not the camera that has changed
it's the damn aliens stealing our sun
>>526527910>Was the sun yellowier back then?smog haze
>>526527910Yeah and there was no chemtrails.
>>526528279ok, another perspective then
yeah and the sky was more blue
In the 70's and early 80's the sun was yellow and the sky was a deep blue. The sun has got much whiter and harsher.
>>526527910The sun can literally only get less yellowDo they not teach the phases of the sun in school anymore?
>>526527910THE MICRONOVA IS COMING!
>>526530570>The sun can literally only get less yellowonly according to the failed mainstream model of internally powered suns.>Do they not teach the phases of the sun in school anymore?it would be better if they stopped and instead started teaching the Electric Star Model.in the ES model, there is no minimum temperature or mass requirement.a stars location on the HR diagram only depends on its size and the electric current density it is presently experiencing.if, for whatever reason, the strength of that current density should change then the star will change its position on the HR diagram, like FG Sagittae, abruptly. Otherwise, no movement from one place to another on that plot is to be expected.And its age remains indeterminate regardless of its mass or spectral type.This is disquieting in the sense that we are now confronted by the knowledge that our own Suns future is not as certain as is predicted by mainstream jew astronomy.We cannot know whether the Birkeland current presently powering our Sun (yes stars are actually externally powered and not internally) will increase or decrease, nor how long it will be before it does so.
Remember when tao water didn't taste salty?
>>526527910sun was always white, its just your atmosphere getting the other colors.
>>526527910that's called smog you dumb nigger
>>526531996it looked orange and didn't blind and burn you, I started going out at night just because of the sun blur, I feel like a damn vampire.
>>526527910Yes it was>>526529238Before the sky was streaked with nanoparticles
>>526530570Retard it takes billions of years damn stupid mutt, disgraceful
>>526532531the world truly was different
>>526527910Idk life today still looks like your picrel to me. And I'm 23!
>>526532589>it takes billions of yearsAccepted astronomical theory describes how stars must "age" (run out of nuclear fuel) and slowly migrate, taking millions of years to do so, tracing meandering paths from one location on the HR diagram to another (the star going from one spectral class to another).The paths that these stars "must take" are, of course, completely predicated on the assumption that stars are fueled by the various stages of nuclear fusion of the lightest elements.The paths of stellar evolution are derived from what we presently know about nuclear fusion in its various stages.The Electric Star model does not make that assumption.In any event, humans have not been around long enough to actually observe any stars making the slow migrations from one place on the HR diagram to another that classical theory predicts.So, at present, slow "stellar evolution" is another one of those complicated theoretical constructs that jewish astrophysicists have devised without any observational evidence of its actual existence.There are, however, an increasing number of counterexamples, stars that have not evolved according to accepted theory.
>>526530163I was born in 97 and I remember the sun being yellow. Now it's fucking white.
>>526532687I am sad about the past bros
>>526532531The sky is still more blue than that as long as you are not in Smogville.
>>526527910Yes it was >t.oldfag
>>526532990>>526532589>an increasing number of counterexamples, stars that have not evolved according to accepted theory.FG Sagittae has changed from blue to yellow since 1955 and quite recently it has taken a deep dive in luminosity.basically FG Sagittae is the central star of the planetary nebula He 1-5.It is a unique object in the sense that for this star we have direct evidence of stellar evolution but in a time scale comparable with the human lifetime!after abruptly brightening by four magnitudes, it has dropped seven magnitudes.From the end of the last century FG Sagittae has moved across the HR diagram (see pic here >>526531562) changing from a normal hot giant to a "late spectral type" (cool) star with marked changes in its surface chemical composition.Its present surface temperature is in the range of 4000K.This is not the kind of slow stellar "evolution" mainstream jew astrophysicists preach.
>>5265279101910 original colour photo. Not colourised. Things look pretty much the same to me.Mind you, this colour is better than a lot of the photo stock we had in the 1960's to 1990's.
>>526528681This
They switched the sun's rays to LEDs during the Obama years to fight "climate change."
>>526527910i remember it was yellower back then yeah. they tell you not to look at it so you don't notice.
>>526527910>Was the sun yellowier back then?there was more smog and haze, but the world was better, the seasons more regular and defined, and it was a better worldas the jews death grip tightens the earth cries out. it becomes less of a home for happy humans and more of a home to rotten jewish demons and their golems
Isaiah 30:26Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the Lord bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound.https://litter.catbox.moe/dyr6x3.pdf
