>>527975006
You don't understand morphic resonance at all.

>morphic resonance can in turn act on both the level of an individual and across multiple individuals to impart knowledge and ability relating to physical feats as well as intellectual ones. This effect is often seen directly in competitive sporting events wherein a long-standing world record will be broken and the next year virtually every athlete will be able to break the same barrier, and within fundamental research wherein large numbers of great discoveries and inventions in science and engineering were done in parallel with entirely independent groups overlapping in their research efforts leading to contested ownership of finished ideas and designs.

>>527975233
You know what it is? Do you believe it exists? Why or why not?

>but science doesn’t support it

Here’s why that might be

>Reality isn't real and consciousnesses are all that exists.
Physics/reality are an interface for consciousnesses to communicate with one another.
You can see this testing conspiracy theory tech in private: it will work a bunch of the time, pretty much any time you believe it.
If you get overly excited and show it to a physics PhD it will fall apart.
If you show it non-physics-educated people, then stoner nerds, then nerds obsessed with physics but not formally educated, then those formally educated in physics but not working professionally in it, THEN a physics PhD, the effect will hold, but typically the physics PhD will obsess over it for a month or three then move on to something else because they never actually had a mind for physics to begin with (that's more or less what academia selects for these days.)
Controlling reality in private is easy, pushing those effects to a wider audience is harder because reality is an interface to communicate, not a real thing. All parties involved need to be able to not necessarily make sense of or comprehend it, but for it to mesh with their own worldview/reality.
A good example is relativity vs quantum mechanics - both are "real," both work, both have predictive capacity, and both are completely irreconcilable with one another - essentially two distinct rulesets for reality which were widely held by everyone who cared to look and accepted as truth by everyone else until they became real.
Electrodynamics and aether theory imo pose the greatest potential currently to merge+expand on "physics," just keep in mind it's all a bunch of bs and try not to paint yourself (and everyone else) into a corner like they did with QM and GR by failing to understand that

>2. how do you explain old age? if quantum immortality is real does that mean that you will end up in the universe where somehow you end up living forever, what about when human civilization ends?
There are practically (from a Human perspective) infinite worldlines (the number of particles in the visible universe to the power of the number of particles in the visible universe of worldline divergences for every quanta of time - a quanta of time is the speed of light divided by the planck length, so it's a fucking lot.) The only thing quantum immortality does is ensure an emergent consciousness (such as a Human mind) won't experience death, it's still possible (and across all worldlines a necessary fact) that you will see everyone else die at some point barring some tech to control divergence and convergence events to avoid that being in place. I for instance am in my late 30's and look like I'm 14-16, as I have since I was actually 14-16, your mileage may vary, but death is a mind-virus, not a real thing. People can appear to age and die because your mind is capable of accepting the idea that they can age and die. Ancient peoples likely mostly got filtered to worldlines wherein fairies or gods or other mythological things were real and saved them, in the modern time it will likely come from the healthcare industry. This isn't to say that choice/free-will isn't important: all possible combinations of things exist, but the probability of a given vector when traversing the practically-infinite futures and practically-infinite pasts associated with a given moment can be altered via consciousness. There are practically infinite heavens and hells, but you have to do the work to pick which you experience if you seek to adjust that for your many selves.

>Because that leaves a chain of thoughts wherein you were memorizing the thoughts - they don't illicit the same morphological changes in the brain.
It's not about the thoughts themselves, they're artifacts of the location. It's about what can be possible from a given chain of moments.
The brain isn't quite simple enough to just think some chain of things that were per-rehersed outside of belief-based systems wherein those are more like chants (regardless of length,) and in turn are highly limited/weak.
Let me try to phrase this differently from a purely physical (no pun actually intended) context:
Say you got a hot girlfriend a few months from now. What do hot chicks want? Obviously there's stability and all that, but they probably also want a nice fuck. Are you a NEET with no muscle tone, or even fat? Is that likely? What if you spent the next few months working out daily and got /fit/?
Now is that causal? Did it happen because you improved your appearance and a woman liked it? Absolutely - it's all deterministic. Would it have happened otherwise? Probably not.

>>527975675
> It's the same sort of thing: it's literally the physical morphology of the brain which directs your consciousness across worldlines - ALL possibilities exist, there is a certain amount of play in what can be accepted from a moment - this is why things like being a solo wizard levitating shit on a table can drive you actually insane: because that chain of thoughts - of showing people and laughing maniacally as you make a fucking pencil float a foot off a table is going to mesh with the rest of reality MUCH more frequently where you're literally just a crazy person seeing shit (probably shortly before being institutionalized) than it is in that 0.00000000000000000000000000000001% chance of worldlines in which you exist wherein it happened. It's somewhat of an art in that you have to aim for what's possible from a given moment, but when that moment passes the possibilities shift.

>Even if we accept your premise without evidence (and we won't) the practical outcome is still the same - the repeatability and durability of scientific insight makes it infinitely superior to quantum krishna woo woo even if the latter does work under some limited circumstances.

The evidence for loa and stuff must be you trying it and proving or disproving it to yourself. That’s like saying quantum immortality must be false based solely on the fact you have seen other people die.

Science has already proven the universe is not locally real. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/
There’s also good evidence for the multiverse / mwi interpretation https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/quantum-paradox-points-shaky-foundations-reality
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36219739/

>>527975731
>You will eventually if this pans out. Consider what you're fighting here: the temporal pressure of the entire multiverse. The same thing pushing you forward into the future your entire life - and an overwhelming number of worldlines where if you know on that level and you're all alone. The natural result is dropping into a secondary worldline wherein you were a solo wizard - right up to the point where you show someone and the pressure driving their reality pushes you into full blown schizophrenia to stop it from working again. This is the main point I was trying to get across with the pencil example and with the warnings about not sharing and about how possibilities change in each moment: we coexist in a shared reality and everyone gets 1 vote. If EVERYONE knows they can levitate a piece of paper then it will work for everyone, and it will be as mundane to everyone as blowing a piece of paper across a desk. If only you and maybe a handful of others know it, then sure, you can levitate a paper all you want in private, and the knowledge will rip your mind apart because it desyncs with the perceptions of everyone else. This is where control over thoughts really comes into play: those chains of thoughts can be more easily controlled when you can intuit where they go next. Intuition is naturally comprised of the stuff which bleeds through time - think of it as Mandella effects isolated to your brain wherein the slightly further future pressure pushes your past self into a common conformation - kind of like an eddy current in a river, the water doesn't ALWAYS flow forward, it just usually does.

>>527975770
>"unlikely" changes with every moment, you have to compound your effects over time to make things manifest.
Everything already exists, it's a matter of navigating where you want to go, controlling your destiny.
There are two basic paths I'm aware of:
Solo Wizard
Pros:
>all da power
Cons:
99.99999999999999999999999999999999999% chance or more of losing your fucking mind in all but a tiny fraction of realities.
Sharing Wizard
Pros:
>all the powers you could ever want in most of your realities (all the ones who navigated into the path, so basically it all boils down to where you connect between moments and encoding escape trajectories from all the shit moments)
Cons:
>everyone else has them too, you aren't special

Bump !

>Alright but consider how old occultism is, don't you think some secret elite society has figured out some extremely powerful rituals or methods that go beyond just law of attraction?

Secret societies only work in secret. They're limited at best when acting on the public scale to manipulation - any idiot can manipulate, you don't need magick for it - and any magick they use for it will always be reducible to that afforded to any idiot who happened to have a few extra resources as a result. They may well be capable of things which go unseen outside of their private gatherings, if they tried to do anything real in public view they would go insane - Hillary-Clinton-coughing-fits-pants-full-of-shit tier insane and debilitated, no matter how many babies they ate. This is why "initiation" is such a critical aspect of secret societies - their shit literally breaks left and right when the "unclean" see it, because every individual has the same vote in the determination of reality and they have to off their "sacrifices" before they wise up so "their" magick is always at less than half capacity anyway - the best they can get away with is physics changes at the fringes where all the scientists are bickering over what's real - and that's largely driven by the scientists involved as they unwittingly refine the spell.

>>527977427
>Be more concrete or write a damn book.
I have explained things as concretely as I can, even as concisely as I can, it's just a lot of information to take in and there's more than you reading it.
>You messed up order quantum<=subatomic<atomic.
No I didn't. "Quantum" refers to the quantum states of atoms and particles. Subatomic is the study of things below protons like quarks - they have quantifiable states but quantum mechanics deals primarily with electrons and higher.
>Using simple terms:
>We are inside [higher entity] dream
No. This is a lie meant to control people through the assumption that something has more domain over their selves than they do.
>Obsessing over thinking only the right things will as easily plunge you into madness!
Autists are born with this ability, those with asperger's are smart enough to control it over time.
>Going solo is not for everyone but there is always frontier. I don't mind a cooperation tho.
I don't disagree on this point. It's probably only the aspies who have the ability innately to manage the solo route while remaining functional