[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1765730053434967.png (241 KB, 582x495)
241 KB
241 KB PNG
>>
She a baddie too
>>
>>527984954
I'd like to watch her get wrecked by a huge BBC if you know what I mean
>>
Wtf does Charlie Kirk being randomly murdered have to do with hate speech
>>
File: IMG_0244.jpg (781 KB, 2010x771)
781 KB
781 KB JPG
>>527984954
She’s so right. It’s time to gas the fucking kikes!
>>
File: 1768668316846120.jpg (7 KB, 249x244)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>>527984954
Freedom of speech is not freedom to hate.
Remember that, /pol/tards.
>>
>>527984954
LIKE I SAID SHE IS DOING AN AWESOME JOB AND YOU SHOULD ALL SHUT UP ABOUT HER NOT DOING HER JOB...
>>
File: IMG_7907.png (393 KB, 728x599)
393 KB
393 KB PNG
what kind of speech is this?

>https://youtu.be/UQAOwgjZdHg
>>
>>527984954
and
>>
>>527985034
is she a meanie?
>>
>>527985100
This is what the right does which you have to hand it to them is effective. The left embraces some term like "Hate Speech" and the right co-opts it to mean something even more broad so they can include anything in it. The Woke Right.
>>
File: 1770412208544787.mp4 (3.48 MB, 540x540)
3.48 MB
3.48 MB MP4
>>527984954
Are you really reposting this old shit? Go back to spamming Obama monkeys, at least that shit is funny
>>
>>527984954
Supreme Court already declared hate speech as free speech, Mr. 1PBTID
>>
File: 1769032240579026.png (493 KB, 750x1018)
493 KB
493 KB PNG
>>527985819
Its almost like 'hate' is an extremely vague term which can mean literally fucking anything huh leftoid?

I mean we know when the left uses it they mean
>being critical of anyone not white or straight

but the word itself is so vague
Your post is hateful towards the right which means its hate speech!
>>
>>527985937
so what?
we're going to weaponize the law or lack of it, just like you do
>>
>>527985315
I mean it is depending on your country, kind of.

I mean we all (should be able to) agree that hate speech is bad and wanting to minimize its presence is a noble goal and all, but to those of you sitting back in stable European countries saying it aught to be illegal I’d like you to imagine what would happen if a government you *don’t* like came to power, started classifying opposition against them as “hate speech”, and applied the law accordingly.

Y’all might think that the people of your country are too brave/smart to go along with such a thing, but it’s only a matter of time until every democracy elects their own Donald Trump at some point, and whether or not that country will survive with its democracy intact will depend on what powers the people in office had to suppress dissenting speech.
>>
>>527985819
If only libshits realized the last 15 years that not taking freedom of speech seriously would lead to more totalitarian cancel culture on both sides, its almost like you get exactly what you deserve innit
>>
>>527985958
Literally this. Imagine how in the dumps the U.S. would be now if Republicans had the legal authority to classify anything they consider as “hate speech” as illegal.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.