>>527990971I mean atoms aren't fundamental particles. Rather they're like a molecule, a structure of components that can be separated.What's real is the Protons. Maybe Electrons too, or even Photons although that's a bit of a stretch. Unconfined quarks on the other hand aren't really a thing.Neutrons are just gay Protons.
>>527990971>nothing existed and then a deity created itself from nothing for no reason and then created everything else from nothing for no reasonlmao christcucks btfojust watch how they respond to this post with absolute monke brain nonsense and/or a typical ad-hom. COPE.
>>527990971Atoms do not exist. Nuclear reactors produce energy via manifestations from God using divine summoning rituals.
>>527990971>1 post by this id>1 post by this id>1 post by this id>1 post by this id>1 post by this id
>>527990971This is so bad that it must have been made by a leftist.
>>527991557>nothing existedShouldn't need to tell you that nothing can't exist, so evidently it was more like something, sort of zero-point energy.>but where does that come fromHard to say, but probably not from nothing, but stuff that's very difficult to detect while you're in it, sorta like you can't see the air.>existence is a fieldAnd non-existence doesn't exist at all since nowhere also isn't a place.
>don’t believe in invisible God despite Him doing magic pretty regularly>believe in invisible germs because biology teacher said soPretty hilarious how stupid atheists are
>>527990971> Athiest retards think objects molecules atoms electrons and matter exists > Its literally all just mathematical probabilities> You: observes it > Therefore granting the objective mathematical server meaning by acting as the client > This hints at intelligent design (not kike religion ofcourse but probably some sort of godhead)Why cant athiests get beyond midwittery?
>>527991643That really would be more like zero-point energy generators, although those ultimately would just create particles, I guess - it's what it usually does.>energy gets too high somewhere>poof, particle pops into existenceUsually together with its antiparticle however, like the field breaking down and splitting into a piece of goodfield and a piece of badfield.>and possibly a Garfield
>>527991858lol philbros are the worst monke brainI'm surprised you didn't use the term "had to"
>>527991966>atheists Oh you mean like you? You reject 99.999% of all theistic claims. You're an atheist about all cults that aren't your own. Dumbass, lmao.Next you'll tell me you can't be atheist if you believe in a god. If you reject ANY religious claims, you are an atheist. Period. I'm guessing you're not a muslim, thus, you are atheistic when it comes to muslim claims.
>>527992061How do christcucks explain chemistry if nothing exists beyond the human eye level?
>chapter 1>talking snakelol
>>527992365It's more like theoretical physics. It doesn't have any real (or unreal) connection to philosophy. It's not about the nature of existence exactly, besides the fact that existence exists, which is not really a theory (probably). Would be kinda problematic if existence didn't exist.>b-but what about muh thoughtsYeah, that's philosophy now. Your thoughts literally don't exist.>especially yoursAt least not in any conventional sense. Something real generates the illusion of thought. Your physical body, presumably.
>>527992513Fire exists to purge the heretic, so exothermic oxidation is highly Christian and divine, and consequently so is plasma physics.
>>527991966Why do christians not believe everything in the bible?
>>527991469In turn those components are constructed of quarks.
>>527992460I read the Bible every day>>527992982Are you projecting nigger?
>>527993503Do you literally believe Noah built an ark and brought two of every animal on it? Do you believe the jews were ever enslaved in egypt?
>>527993960Do all physicists believe in wave particle duality? Like really, do they believe in redescribed shabbat laws based on a null result? Or do they believe it because they have to?
>>527994196Not one straight answer lmao
