[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_20260208_182702.jpg (759 KB, 1078x1874)
759 KB
759 KB JPG
Lawmakers ask what it would take to "store" the International Space Station - in a Space Harbor https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/02/congress-advances-bill-requiring-nasa-to-reconsider-deorbiting-space-station/
>>
there's no way to save it, you would need a fuck ton of fuel and rockets to push it into a stable orbit, it's not happening, would cost probably tens of billions of dollars if not more, billions in R&D alone just to build a system to push it
>>
File: tacobell.jpg (18 KB, 258x200)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>528014553
Fuck that. I want another shot at a free taco.
>>
>>528014658
The cost of pushing it is substantially less than the sunk cost of having it crash back down to Earth. The ISS still has utility.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.