>>528040837
Pol was made before Epstein and M00t had contact
>But it was only a day
4chans dev team, not including wd snacks (who left when /l/ was removed) is notorious for shitty development cycles where boards often take months to make, this would mean we have to assume that
>Contact happened a day before reported
and
>Web development happened rapidly for the first and only time in 4chans existence

furthermore, in later emails epstein describes m00t as "a problem"

The lesson to learn here is not that /pol/ is some space for his views (indeed ghislane ran reddit)
Instead that he saw it as a valuable possible tool for manipulation, and I think it's clear much of the shilling we've noticed will have stemmed from epstein, particularly neocon, warhawk viewpoints

Being that these viewpoints are more unpopular than ever the only conclusion I can come to is that we won

>>528040837
>without sounding mad

Why would I want to do that?

>>528043157
t. mad
>>528042925
less mad

>>528040837
he pushed unrestricted gun rights?

>>528040837
"No, he didn't."

>>528043847
Mad
>>528043992
Mad

>>528044054
Why would being mad matter more than being correct? the evidence suggests /pol/ was not a product of epstein
One thing I'd like to look up actually is if there is any evidence epstein killed Isaac Kappy, as that would be an interesting development

I don't speak jpeg, human holocaust