itt: we post tests only Whites can solve
810
>>528448471026
>>528448471605
>>528448471260
>>528448527fails rule 410 and 206>>528448590fails rule 206
>>528448527contradicts hint 4>>528448590contradicts hint 3
026indian bait thread
>>528448471620
>>528448664oh, 065
>>528448471This is a retarded "gotcha" puzzle because when they say "one number" they don't mean ONLY one number.You can eliminate the numbers 7, 3 and 8 since "nothing is correct" should be straight forward enough.You then think that "well this is unsolvable, since there must be a 6 and hints 1 and 3 contradict each other" but that's where the "GOTCHA!" comes in. In the first hint, both the 2 and 6 are correct and well placed, but it deceptively makes you think that it has to be only the 6 that is correct and in the right place.Therefore the answer is 026.It's very Jewish.
>>528448689wrong, 6 can't be the last number
>>528448471There's no correct number. This thread is bait.
029
>>528448700Rolling again 802
>>528448732why retard? is english not your first language. > two numbers are correct but wrongly placed.yes they are 2 and 0
>>528448471624
>>528448471It's either 621 or 624Doesn't seem to be any way to rule out one or the other though
7, 3, 8 are wrong6, 8, 7 - one correct but wrongly placed, thus 68, 2, 6 - one correct and well placed, so 6 in third spot is correct 2, 0, 6 - two correct but wrongly placedbut 6 is certainly in third spot0, 2, 6 is possible if they ignore 6 in third hint but Jewish way of writing hints confuses anyone
Not possible. Nothing is correct in 738 so top center must have 6. Top left then means 6 is the rightmost. This contradicts top right that would require 6 to not be rightmost.
>>528448715lolIf the statements are leaving open that caveat it's unsolvable, but if you simply plug in the possibility that the statements do exclude that caveat, the puzzle is laughably easy and has only one solution. >>528448590
>>528448471720
>>528448471864 satisfies all the conditions. I am sure there are other combinations.3 minutes thinking.
>>528448856English is not your primary language so you are misreading it. Read it again and reconcile the contradictions>>528448811How did you get that and not 621?
>>528448895wrong, there can't be 8 in the code
>>528448895Not it doesn't. In 738 nothing is correct so no 8.
>>528448471025
>>528448821This
>>528448471056 or 096
>>528448471065
>>528448930oops, you're right
>>528448674>>528448676We can exclude 7, 3 and 8. But that leaves us with a contradictory statement about the 6 in hints 1-3. In particular between hint 1 and hint 3, as these can only be about 6.
>>528448471024
>>528448471Hints are contradictory.Puzzle made by morons for morons.
>>528448982This only works if when hint #3 says "two numbers are correct but wrongly placed" it means that only one number could be wrongly placed instead of both. And that still doesn't narrow it down to a single possible combination if you only have one shot at getting it right.So again it's still completely Jewish deception
>>528448471it's a trap
Im smart enough to say fuck this puzzle and this thread
>>528448676>contradicts hint 3not at all2 numbers are correct but in the wrong spotthe third number is not commented on and can very well be correct in the right spot
>>5284484718 and 7 are eliminated by rule #4.This means 6 is correct because it's the only left option on #2This means the code is _ _ 6But this is contradicted by rule #3 which states that 6 can't be the ending digit.So therefore it's impossible
>>528448990The last hint says one number is right and wrongly placed but that does not necessarily mean the other numbers are wrong. That’s why I’m going with 024.
056..?
>>528449130Well actually. One second
>>528448821That's what I figured too but I don't like that the 206 clue ommits the 6 in the description.
>>528449159there's no 5 so that can't be the answer
>>528449155But it must have a 6 specified by second and fourth rules.
>>528448471Not possible, the hints contradict each other.
>>528448715>This is a retarded "gotcha" puzzle because when they say "one number" they don't mean ONLY one numberyup, there are no solutions if you consider the "ONLY one number" interoretation.
>>528449266It doesn't say there can't be a 5 or 9, but even then that would make it impossible to narrow it down to a single answer if we take every hint at face value.Its just KUBAR
>>528449266Why not? Where does it say that we can't use "5". We can simply infer that 5 is a valid part of the solution even though it isn't listed in the keyset.
8, 7 are eliminatedBy rule#2 6 must therefore be correct.Rule #1 states that one digit is correct AND in the right spot. Since 6 is in the end position in rule #1 and rule #3 makes it impossible for 6 to be in the last position, that must therefore mean that 2 is the correct number in the correct position in rule #1 because 8 is also eliminated.Since 6 can neither be in the last position, through rules, nor the middle position it must be in the first position.So 62_So now the last digit must be either 1 or 4 by rule #5 since 0 is eliminated by being in the only available slot, which proves it must be wrong.That's as far as I can get though
>>528448471hint 4 says 7, 3, and 8 have been eliminated as non values with no place.hint 2 has an 8 and a 7 which have already been eliminated so the 6 must be to one that "is correct but wrongly placed".hint 1 has only one correct and well placed digit and it it 6. the 3rd digit is 6.hint 1 also eliminates 2 because 6 is the only correct digit.with hint 3 and an eliminated 2 0 and 6 are the only options and we already know 6 is the third digit. so 2 must be wrong in the second position and 0 must be the first digit.hint 5 doesn't reveal anything.from here it's process of elimination. we haven't seen a 5 or 9 in this yet.therefore it must be 056 or 096.if i'm dumb shoot me down smart anons.
>>5284492665 is a digit you fucking retardHINT: hints are inclusive, not exclusive.
why did it take so long for anyone to say 042
I would say 026
>>528449391jewry declares it's not 9, because the 6 could be 9 upside down and 6 would already fit rules. so 056
You guys were right this is bullshit.
>>528449360that's just means the enigma is ill formulated
>>528448811This
>>528449460lol i think we found a winner if we assume maximum jewery
>>528449442nah, breaks the 206 rule
>>528449360Though actually if you interpret "2 are correct but wrongly placed" then all 3 numbers could be correct in rule #3 which must actually be the case. Meaning the answer is 026
>>528448471The first hint throws everything else off. The other hints force 6 in the middle.
>>528448715Well in that case it didn't say that "nothing is correct" applies to all numbers either in that hint either. There's no "gotcha" if you just apply the rules selectively - that's retarded.
>>528449416Because unfortunately there isn't a '6' in your '042' solution. 2nd and 4th clues indicates that there is a 6.
>>528449460i don't think according to that bullshit. it's 056 or 096.
>>528448471820 is my final guess Alex.
>>528449552I can't tell if you are defending this jewery or not
>>528449513I should have stuck to my guns with my first statement and been like fuck this puzzle
>>528449360>>528449530>>528449470I corrected myself above. you can solve it it's just more of a word game than an interesting logic puzzle: 026
>>528448471162
>>528449643>wordgameIt's called "doublespeak" anon...
>>528448471>two number are correct
>>528449599Could also be 520 if we use a number not listed in the puzzle.
>>528449598you might not think that way, but the jews do.we need to understand all viewpoints if we are to combat them, for what good is ignorance?or maybe you're just a jew
>>528448471The puzzle is broke. box 4 rules out numbers 7 & 8so box 2 means 6 is a correct number.which means that box 1 rules out 2 if 6 is validbox 3 tells us 6 & 0 are valid but how can 6 be in the wrong spot if box one tells us it's in the correct spot?>This means the answer must be 066
>>528448471You are retarded.
>>528448811>624breaks 687 rule
>>528449565you're right. Ive seen this puzzle but the numbers are different in this one to make it even dumber
>>528449747It's 162, stupid
>>528449716i understand the viewpoint but i'm not going to constrain my thinking to fit it. touch grass nigga.
>>528449747Good one. I like your thinking. I don't know if it is correct but great point.
>>528449747actually yeah, the puzzle doesn't say digits can't be repeated.this expands possible valid answers to> 056 066 096
>>528449599>820breaks 738 rule
>>528448471026826 - One number is correct and well placed =2687 - One number correct but wrongly placed = 6206 - Two numbers are correct but wrong place = 2 and 0. 6 is correct too; but its in the right place so the statement is still true.738 = Everything is wrong = True410 = One number is correct but wrong place = 0
>162Is correct
>>528448715Very Jewish indeed
>>528448471Troll thread. No correct answer.
>>528449926Wrongthe correct answer is 162.
>>528448590>>528448674>026>fails rule 206It doesn't fail rule 206. Rule 206 tells you that there are two number that are correct but wrongly placed which is true 0 is correct and wrongly placed and 2 is correct and wrongly placed. 6 is correct; but it is also correctly placed so the statement is still true.026 is the answer.
>>528449860>162yawn, breaks 826 rule
>>528449955no: >>528449984
>>528449829>>528449747056 and 096 break rule 3. 6 is not in the right spot.but if you duplicate 6 and treat each one individually, the rules work for 066.so 066 is it
>>528449956The hint 206 "two are correct but wrongly placed" would say "three are correct but wrongly placed" if you were close to being not retarded. 162 is the correct answer.
>>528449926Probably a few others are white but this anon definitely white>Two number/pol/ is full of 70iq jeets and miggers
>>528448471One number is correct and well placed.2One number is correct but wrongly placed.Cannot be 8 or 7 given the (nothing is correct rule)Must be 6Two numbers are correct but wrongly placed.2 is established as correct already. Both 6 and 0 could be correct if they are moved.Nothing is correct.It cannot be 7,3,8One numbers is correct but wrongly placed.I established 2 is right. The other possibilities are 6 and 0. 0 Cannot be the last number if it's correct. 6 cannot be the last number if that's wrongly placed. 0 can also not be used in the second slot, as that is where 2 is correct.I'm down to 025 if we are allowed to use numbers not listed.
Alright, classic logic-lock brain teaser Let’s crack it cleanly.Step-by-step logic1. From 738 “Nothing is correct”So 7, 3, 8 are not in the code at all.2. From 687 “One number is correct but wrongly placed”Since 7 and 8 are impossible, the correct digit must be 6, but not in the first position.3. From 826 “One number is correct and well placed”8 is impossible, so either 2 (middle) or 6 (last).But from step 2, 6 cannot be last, so: 2 is correctly placed in the middle4. From 206 “Two numbers are correct but wrongly placed”We already know 2 is correct but here it’s in the wrong spot good.The second correct digit must be 0 (not 6, since 6 would be well placed here).So 0 is in the code, but not in the middle.5. From 410 “One number is correct but wrongly placed”4 and 1 are not used, so the correct digit is 0, and it’s not in position 3.Final placementMiddle = 20 cannot be middle or last 0 is firstRemaining digit = 6 (last) Final Code: 026Nice puzzle — this one trips a lot of people because the clues are very precise. Want another one?
>>528450048826 rule kills 162
>>528450037the rule is they were misplaced. it doesn't say if one or both were. 6 is the 3rd digit.
>>528448471Uhh hint is only pointing to one specific box and there isnt a comma in between correct and but. The missing period at the end of the sentence is a non issue given that the there are no other words, so that one can slide. Given that this is our only hint, and that the code is a single digit that is "wrongly placed" or perhaps out of order, that would make the "right" sequence 678 numerically ascending. It would appear the key is 3 digit key 777
>>528449956>>528450048>162 is the correct answer.Which number is correct and well placed in 826?
>>528448715I had the same thought while reading it.
>>528450131see >>528450077
>>528448471
>>528448471206
>>528450077hint one says 1 digit is right and in the right place.it's either 6 or 2 bro.
>>528449956that works only on an arbitrary interpretation of the 206 rule. Strictly speaking it imposes only 2 out of the 3 numbers are part of the solution and that excludes 026
First time going this.We need to go over some hypothesis first:>assume that when the puzzle says one, it means exactly one, and only that one, not at least one.>assume that when the puzzle says two, it means exactly two, and only those two, not at least two.This is semantics but I believe it's important.>rule 47, 3 and 8 are incorrect.>rule 1Either 2 or 6 are correct and well placed.>rule 26 is correct but wrongly placed.8 and 7 contradicts rule 4.2 contradicts rule 1 because 6 is the ONLY correct (first hypothesis).Going over rule 1 code is --6 since 6 is correct and well-placed.>rule 3This rule is weird.2 contradicts rule 1 because ONLY 6 is correct.0 is correct because there must be two correct, and 6 is correct and 2 is wrong.CONTRADICTION:Either both 0 and 6 are wrongly placed, which contradicts rule 1Only 0 is wrongly placed.I'm going to consider ONLY 0 IS WRONGLY-PLACED.So code is 0-6.>rule 5This rule is bullshit.0 is correct.0 is wrongly placed.There are no more correct numbers.Hyphotesis are invalid.But if hyphotesis are invalid, rule 3 becomes bullshit too.
>>528449357Why not 9 then? It's not listed either. If you're just going to guess you might as well say its "w".
>>528450251>Hypothesis are invalid.this is the only possible answer
640 by the way
>>528450247what part in my post is wrong? please point out, because i see no error. quote it, please
>>528450294see >>528450077
>>528448590Correct, and it shouldn't take a white guy more than 20 seconds to figure it
>>528450251see>>528450077
>>528450037they don't break rule 3 if only one is out of place.the rule just says they're "misplaced"
>>528450316I fucked up
>>528450077The first set of numbers says only one number (either 2 or 6) is correct and well placed. They cannot both be correct and well placed.
Abandon thread.Blue - how we get to 6 being the right number by eliminating 8 and 7Underscored red - 6 is the right number and well placedGreen underscored - says 6 is wronlgy placed, directly contradicting red underscored.In summary - a nonwhite had AI make this riddle to post it here and bait white men to waste their time
>>528448895>white supremacy flag>brown reasoning jew
>>528450249>026>that works only on an arbitrary interpretation of the 206 rule.Its not arbitrary and its necessary to solve the puzzle. The statement that two numbers are correct but wrongly placed is true for the 2 and the 0. The 6 is correct and properly placed you simply haven't been given this information.You're just solving if all the statements are true and they are. 0 and 2 being correct but wrongly placed does not contradict 6 being correct and correctly placed. Its a trick question and that's the trick.
>>528450037206two number are correct but wrongly placedcan't be 066069065or OP is a faggot.
Either 025 or 024. I'm guessing 025 since in the last code 0 is with 4 and it says only one number is correct but wrongly placed.
>>528450365>>528450365yeah, one is correct and well placed, the 6the 2 is not correct and well placedthe 8 is also not correct and well placed>>528450379see >>528450077ai solved this by the way
4chan thinks my machine logic is spam, but basically>jew is whether the terms are exclusive >"two numbers are correct but wrongly placed" might not mean that ONLY two numbers are correct, the third number might be correct and correctly placed. Jew answer, 026
>>528450301slowly re-read my post to you.
>>528450131I have revised my answer to incorporate this new scientific knowledge. Thank you for correcting my retardedness.
>>528450247see>>528450496also see >>528450474
holy shit what a bunch of dumbfucks.is this what's left of pol?
>>528450548correct AND well placed does not mean that out of the other two one of them cannot be correct but placed wrongyou lack reading comprehension, you are a nigger6 is correct and well placed2 is correct but not wrong placed8 is not correct and thus wrong placed toogoddamn amerimutts, man
>>528450548The indumnification is complete. It is now time. Release the files Pam!
>>528450353at least you realize you do, im talking to some mcdonalds baby who does not even understand the explanation
>>528450532a proper clue would say 2 digits are right but one is the wrong place you retarded nig.
>>528448471only braindeads can solve this logical abomination
Oh no we were duped! This is literally the first time we wasted time on a time wasting question.
First two numbers are 0 and 6 but I can't figure out the last one. To me it seems that the last number cannot be any of the ones mentioned since including anything in the image as the third one would break a rule. It's impossible to know whether the last number is a 5 or a 9.Also, "well placed" isn't guaranteed to mean "correct placement" so I ignored that part - otherwise the first and third rule would contradict each other>>528450654I believe I have solved it now
>>528450690Generally when someone posts a puzzle you assume there is a correct answer.
>>528450619suck my dick. i'm done with this retarded shit. it 056 or 096 maybe 066 and if you can't come to that conclusion, i can't help you.
>>528450654Oh, I only read your explanation now. I failed my second attempt at solving it as well. Now I feel dumb
You all fell for this time-wasting puzzle.
>>528450792There is no correct answer unfortunately. This is the future A.I. slop we get to look forward to. A bunch of shit that doesn't make sense to any of us.
106.
>>528448703Ding ding ding!
But OP says only whites can solve this problem, so let's assume the terms are exclusive.[One number is correct], [one number is well placed]. Let us assume that both terms must be independently true.Let us also banish other common jews>zero not technically being a number>numeric values above 9, we must assume that 10,11 etc are not valid numerical inputs.>code being synonymous with key, no alphanumeric input>statements apply only to the code above them; not universally. "Nothing is correct" does not negate the other termsAt higher levels of education a "trivial" answer is marked as incorrect, on the basis that it ignores the substance of the question. At lower levels i often score more than the theoretical 100% by nominating multiple correct solutions.
>>528449513No it doesn't. This is specifically worded to fool people.Its like the riddle. Two coins make fifteen cents. One is not a nickle. What are they? A dime and a nickle. It says two numbers are right but in the wrong place. It doesn't say anything about the third number. The six is in the correct spot. You could amend that rule to say - three numbers are correct but two are in the wrong spot. But if you look at the other rules you dont need to amend it. It's only referring to the 0 and 2.
>>528450885stfu know nothing faggot.
>>528448471Hint 4 | 8 and 7 are outHint 2 | therefore 6 is a correct numberHint 1 | The correct number is the 6, and it must be on the rightHint 3 | We are at a totally impasse, because 6 is a correct number, well place, yet the hint says it's wrongly placeTherefore, what this means is, the hints don't tell the "full story". For example, the Hint might say "one number is correct and well placed" without mentioning the number that's correct and poorly placed. Re-evaluating from the beginning.Hint 4 | 8 and 7 are out. The hint is absolute and covers all, so this is absolutely correct.Hint 2 | Because 7 and 8 are out, the one correct number must indeed be the 6.Hint 1 | The 8 is out. But the 2 could possibly be the well placed correct number, as well as the 6.Hint 3 | Possibility 1: If the number referred to by Hint 1 was the 6.Then this Hint must be talking about the 2 and 0. The answer would be 026. This comports itself with [Hint 5].Possibility 2: If the number referred to by Hint 1 was the 2.The 6 must not be well placed despite being true, so the 6 must be in the middle. But we already asserted the 2 was in the middle. So this completely fails on its face.Therefore the answer is 026
>>52844847102630 seconds
>>528450671you lack reading comprehension so it needs to be explained even more clearly to you than to others. you are actually below 100 IQ if you dont understand that >only one is correct and well placeddoes not mean only 1 is correct i guess you need an extra hint which says>hey stupid fat ass american bitch, this means that one can be correct and placed well and that another number, even 2, can be correct but not well placed
>>528450740you realize this is 4chan rightand /pol/ no lessthere is never an answer right enough
>>528450320If you assume that hint #3 omits something, yes. That in addition one number is correct and well placed. Which we could assume as redundant as hint #1 already states just as much about the 6.
>>528450928My bad - I was just trying to warn you.
>>528450933see >>528450077
>>528448703Yeah
>>528450965I have participated in puzzles in the past where there was a correct answer.
>>528450946solve the problem then faggot.
>>528450940>826 - one number is correctIt's better to be right than be fast.
>>528450048>three are correct but wrongly placedBut that's wrong nigger, only two are wrongly places. The third is correct and correctly placed.
>>528451006Fuck. I gambled and lost. Brb going to kfc
>>528448471This is not a solvable puzzle without clarification, as there are contradictions that make solving the puzzle impossible. But whoever made the picture either can't understand proper grammar, and/or is trying to make 206 seem as the number 2 is correct but is just wrongly placed, but the proper way to say this phrase is "number 2 IS correct, but wrongly place," as saying the word "are" means plural numbers. If that isn't the case, then this puzzle is wrongly made.
>>528451006You're not right because there is no right answer to this puzzle.
>>528450077>6 cannot be last, so:>Remaining digit = 6 (last)fuck off nigger faggot
>>528448471All weaponized autists are now in this thread wasting their time.There is no answer that can't be disproved with jewish wordplay.
026, the wording threw me off for a bit. not clever nor cool.
>>528451115It's not clever, it's like a retard question, and part of the solution is figuring out the retardation of the question.
>>528451115Given the wording of the first code would imply only the 2 or the 6 is correct and well placed. In other words, they both can't be correct and well placed.
>>528448471022025029It's one of those
>>528450971i'm aware and ia is going to take over ceo positions first. who could possibly maximize shareholder profits better than a super-computer?billionaires are building data centers all over the country to eventually take the nice jobs we worked hard for,in the not near future ai will ceo companies.
>>528448715god that's jewish. you have to pilpul the language and take a dishonest interpretation to solve it.
>>528451255Nvm I ignored the second hint
>>528451073It doesn't say "nothing is correct" applies to all numbers in that hint :) one or two digits could be correct. We learned from the others that the statements can be selective.
>>528448471062?
>>528448471Life won't give you any hints. Just lockpick it or shoot it off, depending how noisy I can be with the neighbours.
>>528448471066It's the only answer that works with every hint, if you consider the 6 in hint#3 to actually be in second place, thus wrongly placed
>>528451689This is one of the other valid answers. Again, given there is no solution if we use exclusive terms, there are multiple answers if we take ALL the terms to be conditional.
>>528448590The number of 026 retards that use AI is amazing.>Read the question. Answer is NO. White don't steal.
>>528448471.026.
>>528451750What's another possible answer?
>>528451689Breaks rule 3
056rule 206 stands for overall wrongly placed aka *06 != 0*6other reasonings fail
>>528451935It doesn't. 6 belongs in the second spot, 0 belongs in the first spot, so there are 2 correct digits but wrongly placed
brainlets are struggling over the statement under 826hey retards, look at this image>one person is a man (correct) AND well placed
Can any anons solve this rebus?
>>528448590Can’t be this.
lmao
>>528452151see >>528450077
>>528448471027.If it’s not this then I think the image is a troll post.
>>528452242026 fails at 826 because that's 2 correct and well placed, not 1>>528452041>056
>>528452242Doesn't work with 826=one number correct and well placed
>>528452242nigger
These two directly contradict each other since 6 is a number.Good job, retards.
>>528452052Rule two then would have to say that there are two right numbers, but wrongly placed.
>>528452336>056Hint #3 says two are correct but wrongly placed. Your answer has 6 well placed.066 is the only answer that works with every hint
>>528452432No, there's only one 6 in hint#2
>>528452336zie >>5284520761 nummer is correct EN op de juiste plaats gezetdat betekent dat er mogelijk nog een correcte nummer is, zelfs twee, maar NIET op de juiste plek>>528452351yes, one number correct AND well placedthat means that the other two numbers can also be correct, BUT wrongly placedsee >>528452076
>>528448471Shitpost, the hints contradict eachother.6 is confirmed by 687-7386 is confirmed by 826-687-738 (validating itself)6 is confirmed by 826-687-206-738 (validated further)>826 contradicts 206So it's purposefully misleading by phrasing.We know 8 and 2 are not allowed because of previous rulings.Using 206 we know 0 and 6 are confirmed.Using this we now know 4 and 1 are out from 410 ruling.Using 206 and 410 we know 0 must be the first number or 0XXUsing first ruling 6 must be the last number or 0X6.Using all rulings the final answer must be 056.826 or 206 text has been altered to make this a troll post. Which is the real test and everyone has failed.
>>528448471holy shit the amount of retards in this thread.The answer is 096, because all other numbers have been excluded (or 066 if you are a bit loose with the rules)
>>528452477And there's only one 6 in rule 3.
It took me 3 seconds to read it and realize it's bait, yet all these replies thinks it's an actual puzzle meant to be solved (the hints contradict each other)
>>528452586>>528452559actually another thing that contradicts eachother.It can be 056 or 096 since not enough information is given to decide one or another.It's a shitpost, flat out.You got filtered also kid.
>>528452624Yes, and it's wrongly placed and belongs in the second spot
>>528452441>answerto what question ?It's a moral question.
What do you guys think it's the average IQ on /pol/ nowadays? sub 90?The 2016 election has been an unmitigated disaster to this place.Let's keep watching these mouth breathing apes discuss this for another hour.
>>528452441Yes, two are correct but wrongly placed056>rule 206 stands for overall wrongly placed aka *06 != 0*6It actually seems to work for both 056 and 066
>>528452680If its 056 or 096, then what are the two numbers in hint#3 that are wrongly placed?
>>528452711Contradicts 826 ruling.
>>528450894>>528448703>>528448821I'm not sure on that one, anon. >common denominator in three hints enumerating correct digit: 6>second common denominator in two hints enumerating correct digit: 0>one hint with both digits indicates wrong placement>one hint with one digit in the same placement as the hint with both digits indicates well-placed>XX6>well-placed>X0X, XX0 >wrongly placed>0X6>digits 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, are all present in hints>none of them appear to be a common denominator in correct digit hints>missing digit can only be 5 or 9either 056 or 096>>528448715you're a retarded niggermonkey
>>528452770>why am I retardedbecause you're an indian living in germany.it's a shitpost jeet.
>>528452711It's not wrongly placed. Belongs in spot 3.
>>528452764056 has only number wrongly placed
--- EXPANDED RULES:#1 one number is correct and well placed: 826A might be 8B might be 2C might be 6Answer must have exactly one of A=8 or B=2 or C=6#2 one number is correct but wrongly placed: 687A cannot be 6B cannot be 8C cannot be 7A might be 7 or 8B might be 6 or 7C might be 6 or 8Answer must contain only one of 6, 8 or 7#3 two number are correct but wrongly placed: 206A cannot be 2B cannot be 0C cannot be 6A might be 0 or 6B might be 2 or 6C might be 0 or 2Answer must contain exactly two of 2, 0 or 6#4 nothing is correct: 738A cannot be 3, 7, or 8B cannot be 3, 7, or 8C cannot be 3, 7, or 8#5 one number is correct but wrongly placed: 410A cannot be 4B cannot be 1C cannot be 0A might be 0 or 1B might be 0 or 4C might be 1 or 4Answer must contain only one of 4, 1 or 0--- COMPILED RULES:A can be 1,5,9B must be 2C can be 1,4,5,9Answer must contain 6 Answer must contain only one of 4 or 1--- RESOLUTION: No slot allows 6, so there is no solution.
>>528452773No, because that's actually the 6 from spot 2
>>528452812066 also has only one number wrongly placed, **6 is at its place
>>528452787Answer the question, what are the TWO wrongly placed numbers?
>>528448590026 fails rule 826. Very blatantly at that."826 - one number is correct and well placed"One does not equal two.>>528448715This is not even a "gotcha", the hint plainly contradicts 026.1. Hint 738 excludes its digits.2. By hint 687, then 6 is in the code and not in the first slot.3. In hint 826, either 2 or 6 must be correct and well placed, but not both. (1 =/= 2, successor lemma).Suppose it is 6. Then by hint 206 the answer must be 026.But 026 is excluded by hint 826.Suppose it is 2. Then by hint 687 6 must be in the last slot. But if it were, then hint 826 is again violated.Therefore there is not solution, the hints contradict each other.QED.>muh languageShould have written "at least", nigger.Jews need not apply.Here's another puzzle:1. If a human body takes an hour to burn (in reality it takes far longer), how many ovens do you need to burn 6 million bodies in 6 years? (One oven accommodates one body and the burning takes one hour).Repeat the calculation for the following values:a. 1 million bodiesb. 500 thousand bodiesc. 100 thousand bodies2. Reformulate this question generalizing it as a relation between the following variables:T - time to burn of a body in hoursN - number of single body ovensj - number of bodiesY - total time in years3. Research a realistic value for T and use it in the formula from (2). What total number j do you propose can be burned in 6 years if ovens burn 24 hours a day? How many ovens do you propose should be used? Is this scenario realistic?
>>528448700yeahbecause 026 would be contradictory to R206
>>528448471065 or 069
>>528452868>>528452841>SAAR NO YOU DONT BE OF UNDERSTANDING>SAAR>SAAAAAARIf you couldn't figure out this was a shitpost within a few seconds of looking at it, you are literally nonwhite.The text on hint 1 or hint 3 has been altered to contradict eachother.That is the answer.
>>528448471These slide threads are getting more and more complicated. Usually we'd have a couple half naked bimbos bouncing around and talking about incels or whatever. Now, they make entire puzzles to distract from the epstein files.
286
>>528452744fugwriting it down helps it turns out
>>528452868It's not about two numbers wrongly placed by one but a combinaton not in place, anon. Going as far as to differentiate 6 and 6 as two different objects which have to be in place is much further from the linguistic meaning
>>528452940fuck, you're right, Bosnia. This is exactly the kind of slide thread that'd trip the pattern-seekers up harder than Qatari Nooooticing threads.
>>528452975Yes, you have to think of 6 and 6 as two different numbers. It's not about the value 6, but the actual individual number 6
>>528448471>>528452902Here's a hint:Jews and women lie more than they they breathe.
>>528448471029
>>528453139Indian posterthis thread has become the ultimate anti-jeet technology.
>>528452711Mental gymnastics. He got you and it clearly belongs in spot 3.
>>528453060But these are not different numbers, these are two 6s, and 6 is in place. You are trying to have a single solution, but that would fail the linguistics. It would even go against the primary code logic which has singular 066
>>528448715Irl you could guess and check after narrowing it down anyway
>>528448471I'm sure other people already got it but seems 624 to me.
>>528453260Disregard that. 6 can't be first number
6 is both correct and uncorrecttrollpost
>>528453280Obvious now rules contradict. It's one of these sort of deals.
>>52844847112345 678. 9 10 11 12 Im outYou niggers
>>528453184Then how would you phrase hint#3 with 066 in mind? There are two possible ways to phrase #3, either like in the OP or "two numbers are correct, but one is wrongly placed"They went with the OP way
>>528448471>026826: 1 number correct and well placed (6)687: 1 number correct wrong placed (6)206: 2 number correct but wrong place (0) (2) 738: nothing is correct, exclude numbers from all other hints410: 1 number correct but wrongly placed (0)206 says that two numbers are correct BUT wrongly placed. Meaning all three can be correct. Just like 826 says 1 number is correct AND well placed. Answer therefor is 026. You are all getting datamined.
>>528448715This is wrong. By convention all hint statements in riddle are specific and whole. If a riddle hint states one, it always means only one. This riddle is wrong, there is no valid answer.
>>528448471It's impossble because of how the hints are written, does "one number is correct but wrongly placed" imply that there could be 3 or 2 numbers correct and well placed? Hint 1:8___2___6Or it could mean there's a correct number but not rightfuly placed_882_266_Hint 2 :__68_877_Hint 3:2 or 0 or 6_220_066_Or it could mean to be correct and correctly placed__6_0_2__Hint 4:"Nothing is correct": It could either mean the puzzle itself is wrong or 7: X__3:_X_8:__XOr it could mean that 738 are outHint 5:Again, One number is correct AND wrongly placed. So that leaves space for 2 correct numbers to be well placed_441_100_With that said, every number could be in every place but if we take the hint "Nothing is correct" then we could either eliminate the 738 entirely or just take that as "The puzzle is wrong and it's a waste of your time"
>>528452998>Qatari Nooooticing threads.I am sorry for interrupting Grand Leader Trumpenstein's 4D chess moves. After all, what could I, a bosnian peasant, possibly know compared to the all encompassing amerimutt mind. Still a slide thread, thougheverbeit.
>>528452940Oh my GOD you're right. The epstein files. This retarded puzzle made me forget about that thing that everyone has been talking about nonstop for the last two weeks.
>>528453505It could also be 062
>>528452424826 - 6 correctly placed206 - 6 is correctly placed, so 20 is not correctly placed. Meaning 026 is the answer. Retard.
>>528448471wtf does "nothing is correct" mean?does it mean that none of those numbers appear in the code? if so it doesn't work, because it means that the 6 has to be in there, but top left says it should be in the right slot whereas top right says it shouldn't be there.and if "nothing is correct" means that some of these numbers are in the code but they're in the wrong places they should have followed the pattern and stated something similar to the other messages.Either way it's a bullshit quiz fuck you.
>>528448471>Two number are correctOP speak heap pidgin belong gay club.
>>528453584>826ONE NUMBER IS CORRECT, BUT WRONGLY PLACEDIf both 6 and 2 are wrongly placed, you will be left with just 8. Which is excluded because of 738, where nothing is correct. 206 and 410 tell you that 0 cant be the third digit. So 026 is the only answer. How do you people even solve the captcha...
>>528453594>Meaning 026 is the answer. Retard.it's a good thing you signed your tardation. 826 = only one digit is correct. if you were anywhere near right, both 2 and 6 would be correct.the problem has no solution.
>>528453603>whereas top right says it shouldn't be there.It only says two numbers are correct and wrongly placed. It doesn't say anything about the third number.
>>528452952>>528452861C cannot be 6, rule #3>>528452903A cannot be 6, rule #2>>528452926A cannot be 0, rule B must be 2 (rule #1 && rule #3)
-- START WITH EXPANDED RULES >>528452818A might be 8B might be 2C might be 6Answer must have exactly one of A=8 or B=2 or C=6A cannot be 6B cannot be 8C cannot be 7A might be 7 or 8B might be 6 or 7C might be 6 or 8Answer must contain only one of 6, 8 or 7A cannot be 2B cannot be 0C cannot be 6A might be 0 or 6B might be 2 or 6C might be 0 or 2Answer must contain exactly two of 2, 0 or 6A cannot be 3, 7, or 8B cannot be 3, 7, or 8C cannot be 3, 7, or 8A cannot be 4B cannot be 1C cannot be 0A might be 0 or 1B might be 0 or 4C might be 1 or 4Answer must contain only one of 4, 1 or 0-- DISCARD ALL "MIGHT" STATEMENTS,-- GROUP ALL RELATED STATEMENTS,-- DISCARD ALL REDUNDANT CLAUSESAnswer must have B=2A cannot be 6, 3, 7, 8, 4Answer must contain 6C cannot be 6, 3, 7, 8, 0Answer must contain exactly two of 2, 0 or 6Answer must contain only one of 4, 1 or 0-- NOTICE THAT B ALREADY IS 2, SO: >Answer must contain exactly two of 2, 0 or 6Becomes:>Answer must contain exactly one of 0 or 6Then because "Answer must contain 6" it becomes>Answer must not contain 0 (because only two of 2,0,6 are allowed)And the last compile rule becomes:>Answer must contain only one of 4, 1-- REMOVE 0 FROM ALLOWED DIGITS-- FLIP TO POSITIVE ASSERTIONS-- THUS, FINAL COMPILED RULESET IS:A can be 1,5,9B must be 2C can be 1,4,5,9Answer must contain 6Answer must contain only one of 4 or 1-- PROBLEM:Answer must contain 6, but A, B, and C do not allow 6.Therefore, there is no solution which satisfies all stated criteria without either duplicating digits or arbitrarily assuming ambiguity in some rule.
>>528453594>206 - 6 is correctly placed, so 20 is not correctly placed.How can all three numbers be correct if the hint says only TWO are correct?
>>528453750>onlynowhere does it say ONLY. The only thing the hint describes is that >one number is correct and in the well placedthis does not exclude another correct number being wrongly placed. Goddamn, OP was actually right, this childish riddle actually filters out retards.
paradox, unsolvable
>>528448471Jew
>>528453862Two are correct but wrongly placedThis doesnt remove the possibility of one being correct and correctly placed. I reiterate: OP is right. This test filters out shitskins.
>>528453910>trolling by pretending to be dumb in 2026NGMI Ahmed
>>528450395you know that I am white because I admitted my mistake and apologized. Ever seen a jew doing that ?
>>528453961Show me where it says >onlylmaoYou faggots need everything spelled out for you. You can not derive truth from hints. It doesnt even matter if this thread distracts you from geopolitical kikes, you dont have the ability to connect the dots.
>>528453793>Therefore, there is no solution which satisfies all stated criteria without either duplicating digits or arbitrarily assuming ambiguity in some rule.There is no reason to not duplicate the numbers though. Why are you ruling that out?
Looking at it more it looks like maybe 026 could work as a solution if you decide to play gay semantic games and that "two numbers are correct but wrongly placed" can still be an accurate statement despite a a third number meanwhile also correct and properly placed.
>>528448471>Nothing is correct
>>528454009>Show me where it says>You faggots need everything spelled out for you.The irony is delicious.What makes it even better is that you'll have to ask chatgpt to understand how dumb you are.
>>528454018Its not semantics. They are hints, not 'rules' as every nigger here seems to call them. This is why it filters out shitskins, they can not extrapolate and look beyond the box they put shit in mentally. Look how many apes here hallucinate the word 'only' in the hints.
>>528453910you think you're right, but you're not. 6 is excluded by multiple paths, and if you allow unstated truths within any arbitrary rule the problem becomes more indeterministic, not less. see the full process here:>>528452818>>528453793>>528454014> Why are you ruling out duplicate numbers?because then some of the stated rules become falsifiable prima facie. (internally inconsistent, self-contradicting), so that cannot be how they are intended.
>>528454084A fool always laughs, at what he does not understand. They are hints nigger, not rules. You hallucinate words like 'only' and extrapolate from that hallucination that the riddle is impossible. It doesnt say only, it gives you a hint that TWO numbers are correct. But what you read is>ONLY two are correctthis is why it filters out shitskins. Lmao, and i see you even made a nice picture to go with your hallucinations. Fucking brilliant.
>>528454171Its not a rule, its a hint.Get filtered lmao
>>528448471>738 are all ruled out>687 confirms that 6 is used and in position two or three>206 confirms that 6 is in position one or two(six can't be in one so it's locked into position two) , joined by either 0 in position one or three, or 2 in position two or three.>410 suggests 0 is a valid option but doesn't confirm. If it does, it locks 0 into place one. >826 suggests that 2 is correct and locked into position two. Basically the puzzle has no clear solution. There are some that would satisfy the conditions but only if you interpret the words in specific ways. Basically, poorly designed puzzle. Please learn to grammer. Best answer is 026 given the poor word choices.
Since no one can give a definitive answer, "nothing is correct" must be the answer. It's a trick question, a futile waste of time.
>>528448471Looks easy, let's see if I'm right.There's not enough information to answer the question, if the lock is 0-9 that leaves 5 and 9 as the middle number. Since it's not mentioned and there's no hint of 9 existing, I'd try 056, then 096 as the combo.But this is enough to crack the code in real life assuming that my tired brain got all the hints.TL;DR down belowHint one is annoying826 one correct but in the wrong place738 nothing is correctso 2 or 6 are correct.687738 nothing6 is correct but in the wrong placexx67382 are all incorrect.206 two correct numbers both wrong.410 on correct but wrong0 is correct*0*1234-5-*6*78-9-0x6
This will dumb it down so (you) might understand>HINT>THE CORRECT BALL HAS GREEN DOTS>answer = 3b..bb....but it also has brown dots! Nowhere does it say only. It gives you a hint, not a rule.
>>528454171>because then some of the stated rules become falsifiable prima facie. (internally inconsistent, self-contradicting), so that cannot be how they are intended.It's the only way to solve it without contradiction or giving no solution. Try 066. It works for every hint, if you consider 6 in the second place and 6 in the third place to be different numbers.6 and 6 are the same value, but different numbers if they both show up in the solution.
>>528448471You call that a lock?
>>528454115again, you're being smug, but you're mistaken.if we allow 6 because of your missing "only", then the only valid answer is:126because A cannot be 6 due to "hint #2"your original answer: >>528453594>Meaning 026 is the answer. Retard.violates hint #3>two number are correct but wrongly placed: 206>A cannot be 2>B cannot be 0>C cannot be 6>A might be 0 or 6>B might be 2 or 6>C might be 0 or 2>Answer must contain exactly two of 2, 0 or 6If you decide to deviate on this hint, then all sorts of other possible solutions become available when you apply the same (arbitrary) deviation to all the other hints. In your attempt to be too smart, you are getting tunnel vision thinking hint #3 is your out, but it actually is not. Note: If you filter me, you simply become defenseless to my rebuttal. Everyone else will still see it.
>>528454377actually ill add to that. The one single rule this riddle gives you is >738 NOTHING is correctGood job OP, its a great retard filter. Enjoy the rest of the thread. Im going back to dunking on pseuds with my gigantic European brain in other threads.
>>528448471The code is 042 Alright, let’s crack this code step by step. Puzzle RecapWe need a 3-digit code. The hints are:1. 826 One number is correct and well placed 2. 687 One number is correct but wrongly placed 3. 206 Two numbers are correct but wrongly placed 4. 738 Nothing is correct 5. 410 One number is correct but wrongly placed ---Step-by-Step Logic- Hint 4 (738): None of 7, 3, 8 are in the code. Eliminate 7, 3, 8.- Hint 1 (826): One digit is correct and well placed. Since 8 is eliminated, the correct digit must be 2 (middle) or 6 (first). - Hint 2 (687): One digit is correct but wrongly placed. 6, 8, 7 are candidates. 8 and 7 are eliminated, so 6 is correct but wrongly placed. 6 is in the code, but not in the first position.- Hint 3 (206): Two digits are correct but wrongly placed. Digits: 2, 0, 6. - We already know 6 is correct but not first. - 2 is possible, but not middle (from Hint 1). - 0 must also be correct but wrongly placed. So digits are 2, 0, 6.- Hint 5 (410): One digit is correct but wrongly placed. Digits: 4, 1, 0. - 0 is already confirmed correct but wrongly placed. Confirms 0 is in the code, but not last.---Placement- Digits are 0, 2, 6. - 6 cannot be first (Hint 2). - 2 cannot be middle (Hint 1). - 0 cannot be last (Hint 5). So the only arrangement is: 042--- The code is 042.
>>528448471Based on hint 1,3 and 5 you’d conclude that the combination would include the numbers 0 and 2However according to hint 2 and 4 you’d conclude it would also contain the number 6 which is incompatible with hint 3Thus impossible.However, thinking outside the box and see 6 is 9 placed correctly (in it’s spot) yet placed wrong and incorrectly (turned around) the conclusion would be that niggers tongue my anus
>>528448471The test is wrong:First picture says one number is correct and well placed from 826Second pic says one number is correct but wrong placed from 6874th pic say nothing is correct from 738, so coming back to 2nd the correct number must be 6, so in the first pic from 826 - 6 must be the right oneBut, 3rd pic says 2 no correct and wrongly placed from 206 - so coming back to first , if 6 is correct it can not be in the last position Using the last pic (5th) and 3rd it would make 0 to be the 2nd number , in the first positionSo now we have 0x6The missing number must be 5 or 9 because the other ones are all excluded.It's not only contradicting itself but also imcomplete
>>528448471056Problem is that this still contradicts rule 206 unless we assume that only 1 of the 2 correct numbers is wrongly placed, which is an assumption we have to work under
>>528454469>Note: If you filter me, you simply become defenseless to my rebuttal. Everyone else will still see it.The riddle in OP is the thing filtering you faggot. With such godawful double digit IQ reading comprehension i have no confusion anymore how you cant solve such a childish riddle. Hint 3:206Two numbers are correct, but wrongly placed2 and 0 are correct, but wrongly placed. Hint 1:826One numberr is correct, and well placed2 and 6 are correct, but only 6 is correct and well placed.
>>528448471066
>>528454424It's no way to solve it. If you allow arbitrary unstated truths within the hints, or digit duplication, the solution space expands contradictorily.>HINT #3 two number are correct but wrongly placed: 206if you propose 066 as a solution and even allow "partial hinting", that would be "two number are correct but one wrongly placed" because the last six is correctly placed.That's more than just impartial hinting, it's an internally inaccurate hint.
>>528454424True. We don't really have enough info to determine the actual answer though.5 and 9 are missing.Can we use duplicates at all?The hints seem to steer you away from a matching digit solution since it we can use dupes we only have 15 total numbers to use as each number would be unique to it's position in the hint if this were true IMO..
>>528448471It's impossible. The rules contradict one another to the point where nothing would satisfy all the hints.
>>528454597026 does not satisfy both of these simultaneously:>#1 one number is correct and well placed: 826>#3 two number are correct but wrongly placed: 206unless you allow partial hinting, in which case MANY more solutions become possible. you can see the entire algorithm here: >>528453793
>>528454115It kinda is. Still, it looks like 026 to me. We know in 687 that 8 and 7 are wrong therefore being the only number in the string remaining 6 must be the right number in the wrong space and can never be the first number in the code. The trick is ultimately the statments "one number is correct and well placed" (but so is the other without invalidating that statment)" and "two number are correct and wrongly placed"(while the 6 is also correct and happens to be rightly placed while the other two being wrongly placed is still true").
>>528454662You're right. There are two ways to phrase hint#3, your way and the OP way. They had to go with one of them to not give the answer away. >>528453499>There are two possible ways to phrase #3, either like in the OP or "two numbers are correct, but one is wrongly placed">They went with the OP way
>>528448471>687 one is correct but wrong place>738 is incorrect>therefore 6 must be correct>826 1 number is correct and in correct place>therefore last digit is 6>206 two correct but wrongly placed>2 can't be correct because it's in 826 and only 6 is valid there>therefore 0 is correct and in the wrong place>therefore first digit is 0>confirmed by 410>it says nothing about 5 or 9The answer is either 056 or 096 unless there's some trick.
>>528448471261 or 264
>>528454795026 absolutely satisfies both:826, one number is correct AND placed correctly (6)206, two numbers are correct but wrongly placed (2 0) >unless you allow partial hintingIts a hint, not a rule. I refer back to the image i posted here>>528454377At this point i feel like me leaving the thread and 'being defenseless against your rebuttal' isnt that big of a deal anymore. You are free to present whatever else you think you have, i am right - and i have posted everything needed to BTFO your nonsens. You can now start to argue actual semantics if you dont want to admit you were wrong.
216
>>528454563True, but also you've cracked the code since you know it's one of two numbers.If you were standing at a real dial lock it would take you a few second to try both 056 and 096 instead of days to try all 1000 or so combinations.That is assuming there isn't any other trick.So is the test wrong? I think it's supposed to be fucked and have a vague answer open to debate, like all of these math problem and bullshit slides.
>>528454907>They had to go with one of them to not give the answer away.The answer is that the ruleset is self-contradicting. I was methodical about how I reduced this, and I'm a person who's written optimizing compilers (you wanna talk about surviving ambiguity...!)>A can be 1,5,9>B must be 2>C can be 1,4,5,9>Answer must contain 6>Answer must contain only one of 4 or 1
>>528453594026 - contradicts 1st rule which is pretty clear in only one number is correct
Guys I posted earlier in the thread maybe you all thought I was trolling. There is only one hint. The wrongly placed number is seven 678 is valid 876 is valid7 being anywhere but the middle of this sequence is its only rightful place.The answer is 777. The other boxes of texts are bait. If they were hints it would be indicated so. They arent hints.
>>528454985>Its a hint, not a rule.You lost trannyInto the back of the brainlet bus with (You)
>>528455038>onlyshow me where it says only please?
>>528448471AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I can't lmao this thread basically proves you're all fucking retarded niggers ahahhaha this is the simplest puzzle I've ever seen which is easily solved in head in 30 seconds. You fucking black nigger gorillas I hate you subhumans are breathing my air ahahhahaha
>>528455024>B must be 2You haven't ruled out b=6 in your post above. You go by the assumption that 6 in spot 2 and 6 in spot 3 are the same number. They aren't, they are only the same value
>>528448471The answer is TKD.Final Solution.
>>528454985you are only able to arrive at your conclusion because you linearly processed the hints. i did not. i reciprocally processed the hints. you landed on a solution which is later excluded by the fully reduced criteria. you fell for a canard designed to ensnare your pride in your ability to endure contradiction.
>>528454996If you open it to interpretation like 3rd pic meaning only two number are correct but not well placed, but third number is also correct ... it still contradicts itself because pic 1 says both 2 and 6 can not be correct.I might be an idiot but I think the test instructions are not complete and well constructed
What if the rule is misspelled? Then it looses its ability to be a rule?
>>528455078In Hint #3 where it's clearly stated that in the sequence 206 two numbers are correct and in the wrong place.So if you believe the "not only!!!" then 6 cannot be where you have it.
162
>>528455078It doesn't say only but if you leave that kind of possibility open, what about the last pic ? It could mean also 4 or 1 could be correct and well placedsee >>528455179
>>528455144>#3 two number are correct but wrongly placed: 206"two [correct values] are wrongly placed"see the problem? only one correct value is wrongly placed if the answer is supposed to be 066
>>528450077>the correct digit must be 6, but not in the first position.>But from step 2, 6 cannot be lastNice AI retard.
>>528455078>>528455329Not to mention that if the answer is 026, it still contradicts pic 1 because only 2 or 6 can be well placed
>>528455416>two number>A. are correct, [and]>B. but wrongly placedThat's the grammatical construction.
lol equals unsolvable. ez
>obviously, 6 is correct and in middle or back place>in #A, 6 being in back place would mean that 2 is either incorrect or in front place>in #C, 6 being in back place would mean that 2 is correct and in middle place>wtf 6 can't be in back place?>put 6 in middle place>neither 8, 2 or 6 are correct and well-placed in #A>what, i-it's nowhereI thought I was retarded for a second and started wasting my time. Fake puzzles are rude.
>>528455179The third number cannot be correct if you follow the clues.With what we have, the conclusion is simple. We'll walk up to the lock and try our two numbers and it should open.There's no vagueness in the language in the 3rd hint.>Two numbers are correct but they aren't in the right placeI'm not sure how this is can be misread. If all 3 numbers were correct, the hint should tell us, unless he hint is being a fucking retard, which would be pointless.
>>528448471There is no solution the hints contradicts each otherIt appears /pol/ is filled with jeets
>>528455416There are two wrongly placed numbers in 206. 0 and 6. They belong in the first and second spot =06_. The 6 from hint#1 is a different 6, thus giving us the only possible answer: 066
>>528455260In other words if the question is poorly spelled you don't have to answer.
>>528455610but if you allow that sort of ninjitsu across all rules, then many more solutions become possible.
>>528455260The irony here is that the correct spelling is "loses."
>>528455610This level of IQ is why you pay so much per kWh you know
>>528448471069 or 065 because 9 and 5 are numeric values.But the real answer is TKD everytime.The Final Solution.
>>528455610It's pointless to really argue it, but the puzzle doesn't give room for a matching digit solution. My point was:If we have 0x6 as known, then we're within 10 combos of opening the lock which would only take a minute. Therefore at that point the lock is effectively cracked.I'd start the middle dial at 5, then try 9 personally. But if you want to go all in like you only get one chance on 066, I doubt you're correct.
>>528455655Maybe. No one has come up with one so far, though. 066 works for all 5 hints.
>>528448471I'm going to say that 066 is likely the official correct answers BUT suggest that someone might be able to come up with an alternative number that also works by arguing two of a different digit. As in As in, sure THAT 7 doesn't work but the second 7 is in the code.
>>528455776056 and 096 don't really work with hint#3 though. It would have to say "one is well placed"Anyway, the thread is about to die, so have a good one
>>528455817The solution is 0x6 where x is solved by spinning the center dial on the physical lock.IMO 066 is ruled out due to the nature of the hints, but it's unimportant because after knowing 0x6 the lock is effectively cracked as it would only take a minute to try all 10 numbers on the dial.
>>528455560If you take pic #3 literally meaning: there are only 2 right digits here but none of them is well placed, it still contradicts with pic #1 and pic #2 because we know 8 and 7 are wrong, so 6 can not be in either 1st, 2nd or 3rd position ( it would have to be 2 in the 2nd position from pic #1)Anyway I 'm trying to twist this, I still get a contradiction.Is this an AI generated test by any chance ? Can someone try having an AI solve it ?
>>528455875And both are missing from the hints. But you did help me realize the answer as explained here:>>528455935
>>528455717Maybe. I'm not a native speaker. I just want to hint at the point that rule #3 is misspelled. Therefore it can be ignored. Or the whole puzzle can be ignored as well.
nancy guthrie made this fucking gay puzzle
>>528455963Correct you are. How did I miss that?
>>528455787>>528455776>>528455817>the right answer is this because of trick wording in the rulesIf you search for the puzzle (go to images), you discover that there are many variations on digits, but the hint text stays the same, and in all cases=, the obscure wording is not the solution.https://google.com/search?q=crack+the+code+826+687+206+738+410That indicates that this particular set of digits has been intentionally broken, so the correct answer *is* that it's unsolvable, not that an ambiguity in the text allows solving it.
>066, even though #C explicity prohibits it because the assumption that the third number is 6 would mean that 0 and 2 are the first two numbersIf you catch the contradiction and tell it to fuck off, that's the only way to pass the test.
>>528455935Nothing rules out 066. The 206 hint just means THAT 6 is actually the 6 for place two.
>>528448471That's not even a numeric lock. And the hints if it were make it impossible to solve.
>>528456068So 2 is correct and well placed?0 i correct and in the wrongx2x410 1 correct but wrong02x*01*234-5678-9What did I miss this time?it's got to be 02X or is this a trick too>
>>528456227see: >>528456182the preponderance of other puzzles in this form rules out ambiguous wording,and also see: >>528455450 which makes the hint grammatically wrong,and also see: >>528454662 which shows how that hint would read were it worded "correctly"in all other versions of this puzzle, never are duplicated digits implicitly relied on, and never are partial hints relied on, and never are arbitrary word tricks employed.the OP puzzle has been made logically defective. THE CORRECT ANSWER really is:A. it is not solvable as isB. the board is being slid.
>>528448471See, while I'm convinced the official correct answer is 066 by similar logic I'd say 720 works if you say the 7 in 687 is a different 7 than the 7 in 738 hints. Why not? If there are two 6s in play why not two 7s?
>>528456379This one doesn't really rely on ambiguous wording.https://youtu.be/lK857tIT4X4?si=jjmSW1h9e5GGuY1FThe image may have been altered to cause no solution, but I'm not certain.
It was the frens we made along the way
>>528456298>02xStill contradicts pic #2 that together with #4 says 6 must be correct but not in the 1st position.So 026. would be our answer but what about pic #1 that says only one number is in the right position from 826 ? The only way to accept a solution is if the hints are very very vague and don't follow and boolean logic. Like for example interpreting hint #1 as meaning: one number is correct and well placed but there is another number also correct and well placed
>>528448471There is no possible 3 digit code that satisfies all the hints exactly as written.
