The reason USA hates Iran more than anything is because it was a failed psyop. Shah was a puppet of USA however he got off his leash in the 70s and started to do his own decisions. When he took part in the 1973 oil crisis and in 1979 the agreement between BP and Iran was going to end and he wasn't going to renew that deal.So they deposed him with the 1979 protests thinking they could control his replacement. They flew in the Ayatollah to Iran and prevented the Shah from executing him. Western media constantly was praising the Ayatollah and aired his speeches constantly. But the Ayatollah played them and ended up being anti-west completely once he got in power. And USA quickly realized they fucked up. That's why they seethe so much about Iran. Their plan to replace the Shah with a pro west puppet backfired completely.
BBC constantly covered him positively in the 70s and time named him the man of the year. They quickly changed their tune once the Ayatollah stopped playing ball. But that was their plan. The Shah was replaced in a CIA operation that backfired completely to USA, West and Israel.
k keep me updated
>>529503629That's just a glimpse of that.iranians are too proud on their race, culture, civilization. Persians are remnants of ancient civilization like ancient Greece, ancient Egypt, ancient China.tldr, being pro-persia is absolute first and foremost.also caused arabs, jews, romans seething since ancient times. Only greeks are cool with them
Is it the coincidence that the Shah was toppled in 1979. Which just happened to be the year that the agreement between Iran and the oil companies was going to end and after that Iran would have nationalized their own oil. And the Shah refused to extended the contract.They installed the Ayatollah thinking that the Ayatollah would become a western puppet and give the oil companies their control back. It backfired.
>>529503629Isn't that kind of the constant cycle of the US? Back someone to regime change, said someone becomes their enemy.
If he was such a puppet explain this interview?https://youtu.be/Ksu5YHK5ZDo?si=9YQ6foj_XxEHOo0p
>>529505679That is what I mean. He was a puppet in the 50s and 60s. However in the 70s he got off his leash and started being more independent. That is why the west supported the 1979 Islamic Revolution and got rid of Shah. They thought they could control the Ayatollah only to find out that they couldn't.
>>529503629The theocracy was installed by America as a means of resisting Soviet influence on deep ideological and religious grounds. Which worked. No longer needed so it has to fuck off.This is what happens when you delude yourself that you can shabbos goy your way into a future confrontation with the jews. "No you don't get it man it's 4D chess, we get their support now and then we dump them and they're btfo lol! Loser jews are about to fall for it and support their demise kek!". The jews would've never allowed you to use them as a launching pad if they didn't know that they could neuter you when your use is exhausted. This also applies to Putin and his clique who think that they're being clever by fencesitting like a bunch of shabbos retards.
Ayatollah played them. He promised USA that he would play by their interests especially when it came to oil. Off course he was never on planning to keep with those promises. And USA realized way too late they got played.>Khomeini "went to great lengths to ensure the Americans would not jeopardise his plans to return to Iran - and even personally wrote to US officials" and assured them not to worry about their interests in Iran, particularly oil. According to the report, in turn, Carter and his administration helped Khomeini and made sure that the Imperial Iranian army would not launch a military coup.>n January 1979, General Robert E. Huyser was dispatched to Iran. According to the narrative of Carter's government, Huyser was sent to promise US support for the Shah. However, the declassified reports show that Huyser was in fact sent to Iran in order to prevent the Iranian military leaders from orchestrating a coup in order to save the Shah. He was also reportedly tasked with convincing the Iranian military leaders to meet Mohammad Beheshti, Khomeini's second in command.
>>529503629A lot of puppets and leaders now are straight up CIA and Mossad agents like Julani. Gotta wonder if the Ayatollah was in bed with CIA but actually hated them.
>>529506173He was. However he played them completely.
>>529503629>Here's why they hate Iran so muchthey dont give a fuck about who is running the local illiterate massesITS A CENTRAL BANK THING YOU RETARDS
>>529506173>On 27 January 1979, Khomeini told the US just weeks before the overthrow of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi's government: >It is advisable that you recommend to the army not to follow Bakhtiar (...) You will see we are not in any particular animosity with the Americans. (...) There should be no fear about oil. It is not true that we wouldn’t sell to the US. (...)
>>529503629No it's because Persians are Indo-Europeans and white adjacent. Arabs are stinky semites and too stupid to pose a threat to Israel
>>529506173Obviously. The late70s/80s was the high-time for US-backed islamic fundamentalism. That's also when they groomed their boy Osama and the Taliban. They thought they had a great thing going with all those guys.>>529506323Initially maybe. That's why they teamed up with Saddam and gave him chemical weapons to use against Iran. But when it didn't work, they just made him their useful boogeyman. Because now they can tell all the mouthbreathing retards they need to keep doing the same thing they always did by eliminating the people they brought to power themselves. While at the same time bringing another crop of islamists into power elsewhwere, like Syria.
>>529506454>No it's because Persians are Indo-Europeans and white adjacent.Ahh look, another delusional Persian diaspora-fag. Are you excited that the Jews killed Iranian santa claus for you?By the way, you guys look about as "aryan" as a pajeet does. You're not fooling anyone with your "good looks".
there is really based interview with the Shah where he basically calls out the jews running the US
>>529503629>But the Ayatollah played them and ended up being anti-west completely once he got in power.makes you wonder who's creating enemies of goyim all the time to plunder them
>>529505557>(((US)))
>>529503629they learned from this and now “replacements” cant be put in charge until they fuck kids infront of a mossad camera
>>529505419I don't think there's any doubt about itIncidentally the Shah was also pursuing a nuclear program, ostensibly for power generation, but he liked to hint that maybe he was going to develop nuclear weapons tooHe was a bit dumb
>>529503629grok is that real?The text you shared is a well-known historical conspiracy theory. While it weaves in a few genuine historical facts, it fundamentally misrepresents the causes of the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the geopolitical relationship between the United States and Iran.Here is a breakdown of what is real, what is distorted, and what is completely false in that narrative.The Grains of TruthThe Shah's Independence: It is true that Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (the Shah) was not a perfectly obedient "puppet." While he was restored to power with US and UK assistance in the 1953 coup, by the 1970s he had immense oil wealth, built the largest military in the Middle East, and frequently clashed with US presidents over his aggressive modernization and regional ambitions.The 1973 Oil Crisis: The Shah was a primary driver behind the push to quadruple OPEC oil prices in 1973, which severely damaged Western economies and deeply angered the Nixon administration. However, Iran did not participate in the 1973 Arab oil embargo against the US, as Iran is not an Arab nation and maintained ties with Israel at the time.Khomeini's Deception: Ayatollah Khomeini did play the West. While exiled in Paris in late 1978, he presented a moderate face to the Western media, promising a democratic Iran, rights for women, and stating he had no desire to hold personal political power. Western media was largely naive to his true intentions, and once he secured power, he rapidly dismantled secular and moderate factions to establish a strict theocracy.
>>529506777The Distortions and FalsehoodsThe 1979 BP Agreement Myth: The claim that the US/UK overthrew the Shah because a British Petroleum (BP) agreement was expiring in 1979 is false. In 1954, a consortium of Western oil companies signed a 25-year agreement with Iran (which would have ended in 1979). However, the Shah already renegotiated this deal in 1973, nationalizing the remaining assets and signing a new 20-year supply agreement. There was no impending 1979 oil deadline threatening the West.The US Orchestrated the Revolution: This is entirely false. The 1979 revolution is famous in intelligence communities as one of the CIA's biggest failures—they completely failed to predict it. The Carter administration wanted the Shah to remain in power as a stabilizing force against the Soviet Union. While President Carter pressured the Shah on human rights (which arguably gave Iranian protesters more breathing room), the US absolutely did not orchestrate the protests to depose him.The US "Flew in" the Ayatollah: The US did not fly Khomeini to Iran, nor did they save him from execution. Khomeini was exiled by the Shah in 1964. He returned to Tehran from Paris on a chartered Air France commercial flight after the Shah had already fled the country. The US did open back-channel communications with Khomeini's camp in early 1979, but this was a desperate attempt to prevent a bloodbath between the Iranian military and the revolutionaries, not a plot to install Khomeini as a pro-Western puppet.
>>529506836Why the Animosity Actually ExistsThe intense hostility between the US and Iran is not the result of a "failed psyop." It stems directly from the aftermath of the revolution—specifically the 1979 Iran Hostage Crisis, where 52 American diplomats and citizens were held hostage for 444 days by Iranian students with the Ayatollah's support. This fundamentally broke diplomatic relations, and the animosity has been sustained over decades by proxy wars, nuclear program disputes, and fundamentally opposed geopolitical goals in the Middle East.
>>529503629Is this the historical narrative? Just confirms "world politics" is all a scripted play. The Ayatollah "went rogue'... yeah, sure.
>>529503629they did the same with the burma coup, they licked their toes hoping they wouldnt be pro-china, they even refused to condemn the massacre of those 25,000 muslims that happened, only when they kept being pro china did they finally stop their silence and slowly critcize how 25k civilians got slaughtered lol.
>>529506836>The US Orchestrated the Revolution: This is entirely false. The 1979 revolution is famous in intelligence communities as one of the CIA's biggest failures—they completely failed to predict it.>The CIA say's they didn't fo it, that proves they didn't.Hilarious shit.
>>529507015take your meds schizo
>>529506454>Persians are Indo-Europeans and white adjacent.No, they're not.
By 1975, western oil companies complained of the agreement and demanded renegotiation marking the first time in history that oil companies rather than the oil producing nations sought to negotiate an oil contract.[3]
>>529505679Watch the entire interview, he condemns the Palestinians.Rightoids are so desperate to pretend kike stooges are secret chessmasters. It's pathetic.
>>529507470He condemns the Palestinians because they are disgusting, and the Jews because they are Jews It's not as simple as Palestinian = opposite of Jew
>>529507470>>529507560Everyone hates the Palestinians, those fucking parasitic cancers upon society, not even the other shitskins tolerate their presence.They only fetishise the idea of muh poolestinian oppression to project hate towards the jews by proxy.
>>529506378thisalso, they officially do not accept that the holocaust happened. you might think that this is a small thing, but jews must insist (under threat of blackmail/death) that every single world leader publicly avows the holohoax bullshit
>>529507665>Everyone hates the Palestinians, those fucking parasitic cancers upon society, not even the other shitskins tolerate their presence.holy fuckcould you any harder cry out in pain as you strike them, kike on a vpn?
>>529508236>could you any harder cry out in pain as you strike them, kike on a vpn?I am not a kike you retard, have you heard of a single country that likes those roaches?Notice how not a single shitskin country is willing to house even one of them.Start listing the countries that like them.
>>529503629He said israeli lobby was too powerful and to prove him wrong they color revolutioned his ass
>>529503629>hate IranThey don't hate Iran, they just want it back firmly under their control.It's a practical, not an emotional position.
>>529503629I was aware of this actually. Britain has their hands in it too. Have been for centuries
>>529506323explains why they were so mad, and retarded
>>529508404>calls palestinians "parasitic cancers" for doing nothing but existing in land that jews wanted to stealtry harder>Start listing the countries that like them.every hypersignalling liberal in america and europe rallies for them, albeit for the wrong reason, because liberals see them as victims of "white" colonialism instead of exploders of jews with RPGs and IEDs
>>529503629My gf is Iranian she is always trying to convince me of this narrative, as I thought US was only involved in 1953 and not in 1979. The only counterpoint is> If the US planned 1979, then why didn't they evacuate the embassy? It seems like the hostage crisis goes against this narrative, but I guess it's possible that they instigated the revolution but just got the timing wrongI tend to believe her. If you watch the Shah's speeches from the time and then consider the level of economic pain the US felt as a result of the oil crisis, there's no way they could've been still supporting him. Idk. This is definitely the narrativeonarchist Iranians believe tho>>529505419This. Also Iran contra kinda supports their theory. Full Iranian monarchists thing every country secretly supports the IRGC tho I think they are a bit conspiracy theorists.
>>529510130>then why didn't they evacuate the embassy?There is no way to proof either way, but putting a few people on the line to have a cleaner narrative isn't exactly new for the US.Just look at the CIA and the drug trade.The US goverment doesn't value their citizens life highly.
