[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1772354755710.jpg (274 KB, 1024x1094)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
>According to Iran's Fars News Agency, the system tracked Iran's missile launches.
Is it still worth investing in radar systems that cost a fortune when they can be destroyed so easily?
What we need are more cheap suicide drones.
>>
>>529504968

China - you seem remorseful at the wasted money.
>>
File: ohno...oh......no.mp4 (1.78 MB, 720x1372)
1.78 MB
1.78 MB MP4
>literally zero opposition @ 35km/hr
>>
>>529504968
-1.1b tax dollars
>>
>>529504968
So, how about we sell 'em another one? Just $2 billion since we have to build it in a war zone this time.
>>
>>529504968
I can fix her
>>
>>529504968
DON'T LOOK AT THE MORPHED BUILDING BELOW THE RADOME
>>
>>529504968
I'm confused
I thought all the jews wanted us to believe that all present-day bad goyim are being given orders from Qatar
it's a US ally?
>>
Israel is one step closer to getting trvth nvked
>>
>>529505031
>wasting a $4 million interceptor missile on a $500 drone
You have to save the AA the real missiles Iran is holding back.
>>
Win win situation - replacement equals lots of good manufacturing/engineering jobs and contracts, no loss of life as place was evacuated.
>>
>>529505111
>checked
kek, there is a vehicle up there as well
>>
>>529505111
Why not? There's a van on the roof there. You should totally look.
>>
>>529505174
Wouldn't losing the radar not affect the targeting and accuracy of that AA as well?
>>
>>529504968
Its common knowledge you build your radars right next to buildings, even better if they are surrounded on all sides by structures. it improves its performance you see.
>>
How accurate are those missiles
>>
>>529504968
>according to Iran
>>
>>529505111
I like how the bottom building in the after picture grew another building on top of it
>>
>>529505055
>how about we sell 'em another one
You mean sell the taxpayer another radar?
>>
>>529504968
>Reposting the same AI picture after it's been debunked for a day now

Take away his social credit.
>>
File: Jensen.jpg (99 KB, 600x800)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>529504968
Chump change.
>>
>>529505031
how do you spend a billion dollars on this shit and not even put a $500 machinegun next to it
>>
File: 1755650035992270.gif (102 KB, 220x165)
102 KB
102 KB GIF
>>529505295
Damned if you do and damned if you don't, there's just no pleasing some people.

Either shoot down the cheap drones meant to deplete AA and have nothing for the missiles, or save AA for the missiles and the cheap drones take out all your radar.
>>
>>529504968
why did the building on the bottom grow and extra level, and the buildings at the top are completely different.
>>
>>529505031
How can military bases even exist in current drone warfare?
>>
>>529504968
Amazing how the balcony of the top building as well and a bridge was built.
>>
>>529504968
Why this image looks like AI?
>>
>>529504968
If shitty muzzie drones can easily penetrate american air defense then there’s nothing stopping us from sinking your carriers and bombing your coastal nuclear power plants, keep it in your mind
>>
>>529505567
And all this happened in the span of one year, damn those Qatars move fast, and I guess you can park your car in the same place all year in Qatar no problem.
>>
>>529505174
The cost of the missile to save a 1.1 billion dollar radar still makes sense.
>>
>>529504968
If that’s a radar then i’m the richest guy on the planet.
>>
>>529504968
>Iranian Attack Destroys $1.1 Billion U.S. Radar System in Qatar
Wow looking at this picture their aim was great maybe 20-30 feet off center. That impressive from 1000 or more kilometers.
>>
File: 1758664716477756.jpg (363 KB, 1024x1094)
363 KB
363 KB JPG
>>529504968
Folk
>>
>>529505174
That's some MILspec grade cope you got there.
>>
>>529504968
such an obviously fake image god i hate you retards
>>
>>529505031
That's not even a missile. That's a cheap ass $500 drone
>>
>>529505863
>>529505968
how op would recover?>
>>
File: 1743193882059555.gif (1.43 MB, 200x200)
1.43 MB
1.43 MB GIF
>>529504968
>shapeshifting rooftops
Sloppy job, Grock.
>>
>>529505567
>>529505621

Buildings exist, get a picture taken. Then they do some construction. Then the missiles strike.

Both of you are retarded and should immediately kill yourself.
>>
>>529506049
Nigga what construction? Your AI is gonna have to do alot better than this, you brown trash.
>>
>>529506172
The video is real tho
>>
>>529506172
The construction that happened to make the two structures look different in the pictures. Then the missiles struck AFTER the construction.
>>
>>529505985
>Iran's Shahed costs roughly $35,000 per unit
Still cheap though, and should have been shot down.
>>
File: Gross_Moments_Youve_4.gif (1.96 MB, 800x400)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB GIF
>>529505255
Broken windows fallacy
>>
File: db0.jpg (53 KB, 349x642)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>529505174
retard or jeet? hard to tell
>>
>>529508854
nice meme mohamed
>>
>>529509370
I'm surprised the cartel didn't burned down your cell tower yet.
>>
>>529505863
>>529505968
What's with the cope? There's literally video of it coming from the US side.
>>
>>529509654
The video is not of Qatar. The building hit was not a 1.1b radar.
The image is AI generated to look similar to the video.
The "report" referenced is from Iran's state media
The post was made from china
>>
>>529509598
they are busy beef.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.