So this is Protestant theology?
>>529942133Based
The fatherThe sonThe holy spiritThe President of the United States
There is a reason women ought not to preach
>>529942133jews bought christianity in the late 1970s
>>529942133No this is a memeflag trying to pass off occult psyops as Christian. Then gaslighting you with their incompetency given they’re blatant fucking jeets.Anyways. The fact that people use the term “Protestant” is such a gay jab at secularism pretending to be impartial. Might as well start sucking religions dick given you literally use their terminology to gatekeep shit you don’t even believe in. Lol, lmao.
>>529942133How did American Evangelicals spend the past eighty or however many years warning about the coming of the Antichrist and as soon as he shows up immediately start worshipping him?
>>529942133Beware the false prophets
>>529942249Makes no less sense than just the 3. 3 can't be 1 lol u dumbos
>>529942443>The fact that people use the term “Protestant” is such a gay jab at secularism pretending to be impartial.Each major branch has its big issue -- Catholicism can be easily corrupted from its leadership, Orthodoxy can be easily co-opted by governments, and Protestants can easily become heretics. If all you need is scripture and faith, then all you need is a dumb-dumb to interpret something dumbly, and then all the other dumb-dumbs follow.
>>529943140Pretending man is a suitable vector as per the texts implication that he knows both good and evil is spiritual blindness. It’s one thing to have a conversation with another human being, it’s completely different when you are being told by the book what it means in context. People can argue all they want about the words changing, the point is the contexts never changed and despite everyone’s best attempts at subverting the context of grace it has completely failed for the last 1950 years. Religion is antithetical to God because it takes the law and pretends like it has anything to do with salvation, so antichrists Gatekeep with it using it as a measuring stick when Paul tells you the flesh is dead (meaning that because you are aware of Good and Evil, you would be spiritually stupid to use what you’re doing as a litmus test to know you’re saved rather than simply believing a promise from Christ) Since the flesh is dead, there are no signs. You know this externally to be the case because Paul tells you to walk by faith, not by sight. Which even out of context, is such a generalized statement that you can’t apply it in anyway that doesn’t already mean what it is saying. Meaning Paul was never advocating for religion and neither was Jesus. When Jesus was reciting the law, he was establishing the context for faith by making it very evident that no one is going to be found justified by what they do in their bodies. This 100% disqualifies religion categorically and this is precisely why Paul tells you, you’re not struggling against flesh and blood. It’s against ideologies, philosophies, occult groups, and other mechanisms of Satan. This doesn’t require you go to mass every Sunday, there is no “culture” in a flesh sense. It’s universally compatible with every type of government because it’s a spiritual context. The flesh is dead because it has been slain by the law, and you’re alive in Christ, by grace through faith.
>>529942133Idolate as fuck
>>529942133no, this is baptist theology
