>>530105527Doesn't matter.
>>530105527technically yes, but only if we lose in practice
>>530105527yawn nigger jew said America bad
>>530105527clearly
>>530105527no white people died so who cares
The war crimes will pile up. The American military has put on a very reckless face for this one. Good luck guys with your war.
>>530105527No clearly not.
>>530105527lmao you are self reflecting for once?
>>530105527>may have It’s the textbook definition of a war crime
>>530105527it took you this long to realize that?
>>530105527No were chaotic neutral.
>>530105527HAHAHAHA name your source Op
>>530105527Israel had been genociding and raping children since forever, and technically you're Israel now, so yes
>>530105527war crimes are such a meme
>>530105774Which textbook?
>>530105527I don't get why this is a big deal? Were they supposed to allow that ship to get to the straight of Hormuz before blowing it up? Why is everyone fixated on that like it's some big crime?
>>530105527"War crimes" are just charges we apply to African warlords, sometimes an Eastern European. Everyone else gets off scot-free, but especially the superpowers. Relax.
>>530105682
>>530105527International waters against a country you are not at war with. Remember, Day 7 of the 4 day SMO regime change operation.
Americans just keep doing the same shit since 1945 and will until their empire collapse. Go to some shithole backward third world country, commit war crimes, fund terrorism, generate ethnic tensions, leave after spending billions of dollars. And then, 5-10 years later cry "uh uh we were wrong", ask Hollywood Jews to make tear dropping action slop movies where they're the victim then move on to the next shithole
>>530105527There are no good guys
>war>crimesPick one.
>>530106273That's the wrong mindset. Just be good and destroy evil.
>>530105527so what?are they going to report it to the war police? lmao
>>530105527We have been for a very long time.
>>530106272Free New Caledonia
>>530106272
>>530105911they are retarded and just latch onto any moronic assertion that supports their worldview.Destroying an enemy warship during war is not a warcrime.
>>530105911It is an unarmed ship, 2000 miles from the battle area returning from an international event they were invited to. Being that far away I would not expect them to be at battle stations. I guess all is fair in war, so who cares. The sub commander shooting at an unarmed boat and killing 80 people probably didn't like the order. There is usually some kinship even in enemies that share the sea. I know Iran is at war and all that stuff, but it isn't like they started the war or declared war. They started to get bombed by the US and Israel and just had to deal with it.
Thirdie cope is getting out of hand
>>530106535>you have to let your enemy get to battle stations before you sink them>its not fair they didnt have any bulletsBoats, like planes, are about destroying the hardware>not declare wariran has considered itself at war with the US for nearly 50 years. "the revolution' is against the west, and they see the US as being the primary enemy.
>>530106535They should have armed themselves if they were going to be traveling in American waters.
>>530105527>bomb them and kill their leaders during negotations>sink unarmed ship on the way home from a multi nations exercise>WHY WONT THEY NEGOTIATE WITH US YOU WILL REGRET THISwhat causes this
>>530105527>Using captured sailors as staged photo props: violates Article 13 of the Geneva Convention>Sinking an enemy warship in international waters: does not violate the Geneva Convention
>>530105527Technically not a war crime because it was a naval vessel although it's still a bit of a cunt act because they knew it was unarmed because they were invited to the same stupid ceremony in India where they had to be unarmed.
>>530105910
>>530105911This question is literally colonialism
US haven't been the good guys since 1861
>>530106535>It is an unarmed shipDid a neutral country inspect the ship to verify there were no munitions on board? Either way, it's irrelevant. Even unarmed enemy vessels can be sunk, like tankers. This is the norm. Read a book on naval warfare and rules of engagement.
>>530105527MUH HECKIN WAR CRIMES ;_;
>>530106535>Just ask to check their guns broCan't spell Canuck without cuck
there are no crimes in war
>>530105527>nick name is "The Great Satan"Perhaps
>>530106535>It is an unarmed ship, 2000 miles from the battle area returning from an international event they were invited to.So if they were sunk closer to their own shores then you wouldn't have had a problem with it?
>>530105527we'll meet putin outside the hague when he's willing to prosecute.
>>530105910They teach every JAG officer about their duty to not follow illegal orders and their example has to do with firing on unarmed or out of commission vessels. It’s like the first example they give of a war crime and an illegal order thet they have a duty to not follow.
>>530105527Fuckers were in international waters. Dishonest? Yes. Dishonorable? Yes. Legitimate? No. Legal? Yes.The captain of the sub deserves a very big fucking medal engraved with the names of all the people that he murdered.
>>530105774Unrestricted submarine warfare is only a crime if you arent at war with the other country.
>>530105731Iranians are unironically more Caucasian than whatever mystery meat is in the American navy.
"When you kill your enemies, you did a crime." -Justin 'Batman' Trudeau
>>530106895>it was unarmedPost evidence it had no munitions onboard.>>530107437>DishonorableFunding and arming Hezbollah to kill 241 American soldiers in their barracks who were acting as peacekeepers is pretty fucking dishonorable. I wish they had fired four torpedoes instead of one to ensure no one survived, but we were actually quite humane (more than they deserved after killing 32,000 innocent Iranians).
>>530107191So why were people so upset about 9/11?
>>530105911Unarmed ship coming from a naval exercise. Blown up without any warning, and then abandoned while it was sinking. Note that in WW2, if a German ship sank an English ship or viceversa, enemies would be picked up from the water. Americans are mutilated jewish dogs with no soul. What can we expect from non-European savages.
>>530107507>it’s not a war when I find it convenient instead it’s a special combat operation >it is a war when you say it’s an illegal order therefore somehow fair game to fire upon an unarmed vessel that surrendered to you Shalom
>>530107702you are lowering the US navy to the same level of Hezbollah.
>>530107748Iran is free to retaliate
>>530107765>German shipYeah, a SURFACE ship, submarines are not typically setup for search and rescue. Read a fucking history book FFS.
>>530107507Has congress approved this war that the ship was sunk in?
>>530107942Under the law, the President has 60 days to conduct military operations without Congressional approval.
>>530107765Yeah, a cramped submarine is totally going to surface and reveal itself to take in survivors. Getting the Sri Lankans to do it was the right move.
>>530105527>we>>530105590fucking psycho
>>530107932Was the ship an imminent treat to your submarine? Why didn’t you wait until it was in the war zone and then blow it up with F35s or one of your ships?Why are you blowing up ships 1000s of kms away from the theatre of a regional war in neutral waters?You’re a subhuman kike dog.
>>530107999He called it a war buddy. A war is approved by congress.
>>530108143>why why why
>>530108143I don't think there were any treats onboard. But if you're a good boy I'll find one for you.
>>530107543they're called sandniggers for a reason
>>530108268>”let’s just blow shit up because Israel demands it”
>>530108324show flag, kikejeet
>>530108316Submarines can have a surface ship once in a while as a treat.
>>530107932>submarines are not typically setup for search and rescueDon't look up the USS Laconia.
>>530107433How was the Iran ship out of commission? Are you saying the Iranian ship was broken before it sank?
>>530107765God damn you are fucking stupid
>>530108488>typically
>>530107765No one actually expects submarines to surface to rescue survivors idiot. The British didn't surface to rescue the Argies they sank and they killed even more than this attack did.
>>530108568he's saying it was unarmed retard. it wasn't a threat to anyone and everyone knows it.targeting it was a warcrime and it has made every similar western ship a target.
>>530108488And look at how that ended.
>>530108605He's not stupid he's just very angry about his brownoids getting slimed by American zoomers in a sub
>>53010844280 years is a long time to go without a treat :(>>530108619Thank you>>530108718Exactlyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7JsD6LtzqQ>>530108762Still no proof it was unarmed (not that it matters)
>>530108568It was unarmed therefore it was out of commission it was not a threat it was on a training exercise by invitation and they set out for that months in advance to get there. It was not a valid military target. >memeflag Kill yourself jew
>>530108762Warships are always valid targets in war, do you really think that if during world war 2 the Japanese ran across a US battleship out of ammo that they would have gone "It has no ammo we can't target it!"Do you think a US ship would go "That Japanese ship fired all it's torpedoes so now we have to let it go!"Unless the ship was flying a white flag and clearly surrendering it's a target.
>>530107886holding america to a higher standard meant something when america was supposed to be on top.then a few countries went about shaking up the world order. as a consequence, this would be multi-polar justice.
>>530105527yes, expect a bold letter from the UN
>>530105527It's only a war crime if you lose. Oh wait...
>>530108918Have you even read a fucking history book? Do you know how many unarmed supply ships and tankers each side sunk in WWII? Whether a ship is armed or not does not determine whether it is a valid military target.>>530109013They might even use 14-point font with underlining! :o
>>530105527It’s times like these that reveal this entire site is filled with brown “people”.
>>530108401kys kikenigger
>>530108918The ship was in active service with a hostile power, There are all sorts of cases where a ship was sank while being utterly defenseless or unable to fight back.Like that one Japanese carrier that was launched unfinished, the ship had no means of fighting back, no aircraft, and it didn't even have water tight doors. US sub sank it anyway. Was that a war crime too?
>>530105527Who's gonna prosecute the United States?
>>530109067>blah blah blah muh faggot history The law doesn’t care about your high school history book retard>>530109253Yes that was a warcrime
>>530109356Except it wasn't because there was no way for the submarine to know that. Just like there's no real indication to prove either way that the ship was unarmed.
>>530108143The goal was destroy their entire navy. Its like in age of empires where you have to kill all the enemies and you destroy everyone on the screen and keep waiting for the victory splash only to realize they have a single faggot villager hiding in the corner of the map, so we decided to finish him off in the most badass way. I dont understand where the war crime angle is coming from its a military vessel days after the intial shots were fired. The crew knew damn well they were toast but it beat spending the rest of the war in india.
>>530108918in a better world they could have captured the ship intact.in a better world it would not be necessary. we are not living in that better world.
>>530109283Everybody since the us is no longer really reliable as a world currency. Do you think the middle eastern nations are happy with them right now?
>>530109647Clearly it knew. As the sri lanka help request states it was damaged and unarmed. You are a liar.
>>530106535If that were the case all cases of trade interdiction would be considered a war crime.
>Did you just sink a warship of a nation we are currently at war with???!?!?!?>THATS LITERALLY A FREAKING WAR CRIME!!!!!shut the fuck up lmao
>>530110031>As the sri lanka help request states it was damaged and unarmed.How could they determine it was unarmed? What report says Sri Lanka claimed this? By the time they arrived it was already well below the surface. Seriously, post one shred of evidence it was unarmed (again, not that it matters).
>DEATH TO AMERICA THE GREAT SATAN KILL ALL AMERICAN CIVILIANS DESTROY THEM FOREVER>ALSO NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST SINK OUR WARSHIP IT WAS DOING A HECKIN PEACEFUL EXERCISE FAR AWAY THIS IS A WAR CRIME!!!
>>530108193Dont you have to ask the King if you can take off your mask if you want to kiss your boyfriend Bruce?
>>530105527>war crimeisn't that phrase a bit redundant?
Oh look what I found, Indian records note that the MILAN exercises did include live fire. How are the war crime sisters going to respond to this?https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/news/42-warships-submarines-and-29-aircraft-how-navys-mega-exercise-milan-unfolded/articleshow/128806845.cms#:~:text=This%20was%20followed%20by%20the,flying%20operations%20were%20also%20conducted.
>>530105527For those that don’t know, Iran was invited by India to take part in war games. When you do these war games you’re not carrying live ammunition so India basically set Iran up to be torpedoed by the U.S.
>>530111376Debunked, see >>530111368
>>530105527>Wait.. are we the bad guys?Yes. For decades in fact.
>>530107932>Read a fucking history book FFS.The fucking irony
>>530105527call the world police you fucking faggot oh waitlol
>>530105527The only thing the USA committing rampant war crimes, business as usual, means is any yank bitching about the war crimes of their enemies is a massive hypocrite, also business business as usual. Nobody is going to be pulling a nuremburg on the US any times soon and definitely not Iran, even if they magically repel you cunts.
>>530105527Israel got America to withdraw from most international bodies just for this lol
>>530105527I just committed a massive warcrime in my toilet
>>530107543Until you actually see one
>>530105527>International Law>War CrimeThose phrases are bullshit and everyone knows it.The strong do what they want in this world and the weak shut up and live with it or die.
>>530111376India didn't do shitThe Iranians didn't want to port in India, they knew what they were doing.The current Iranian ship in the Indian port is at India's request too, not Iran
>>530105527
>>530111509>international bodiesThose are basic bitches and have been running their mouths for too long so we kicked them to the curb.
>>530107507Unrestricted submarine warfare means sinking merchant ships, we torpedoed a ship of war of a nation actively firing missiles at over a dozen countries. How is that a war crime? You >people are fucking stupid.
>>530111456I have a minor in military history and have probably read more books than the number of brain cells you currently have.
>>530105527Who the fuck is going to save Americans after taking out an aircraft carrier?
>>530105527always have been
>>530107765>Note that in WW2, if a German ship sank an English ship or viceversa, enemies would be picked up from the water.This happened occasionally in the early first world war, the german u boat would surface, tell the crew to abandon ship and then sink it. They stopped doing this when the allies started using Q-ships, armed merchant ships that would open fire on the u-boat when it surfaced. in the second world war; there were some cases of U-boats trying to help survivors, but these stopped, again, because the allies took advantage of them >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laconia_incident
>>530111376You sound like a hysterical blue haired faggot>F-f-for those that don't know
>>530108324>they're called sandniggers for a reasonPersians are Aryan. The US Navy is not.
>>530107543
It's decidedly not a war crime. Targeting a military vessel by another. There is no requirement to warn of attack or for a submarine to endanger itself to assist survivors. There wasn't in WW2 (Where every major power engaged in undersea warfare that way) nor after in the conflicts with Pakistan-India and UK-Argentina. They let SAR be carried out on the crew by others.As for the claims the Iranian ship was unarmed, there is no definitive way for the American sub to know that. It would also not be the Americans' problem.
>>530108770in an allied war crime?
>>530107543Whitest around
>>530105527>are we the baddies Have been since before WW2
>>530111958Aryan super soldiers
>>530111913Whatever helps you cope.
Yeah not like brown Americans
>>530109940>we are not living in that better world.The US actually had the option of not launching attacks on hospitals. The US submarine could have followed its own laws and relayed the distress of the ship it sunk. There's actually nothing that stops the US from behaving humanely and in accordance with its own and international laws. Except its allegiance to the Zionist Entity.
>>530107942Iran has repeatedly done shit that qualify as declarations of war well before any of this current shit went down. Many of them using the very boats we just sank.
>>530105527Obviously the leadership that rate Abbie’s and preys to Satan are probably the bad guys idiot
>>530105527>US may have commited war crime
>>530105731Iran means the land of the Aryans.
>>530112055Totally
>>530112243I literally typed eats babies and they changed it lol
>>530112281Imagine how much damage he could do with that pipe
The reason that submarines stopped rescue operations is because they would be forced to travel surfaced and the Allies had no trouble trading a couple dozen PoW's for a German submarine. That doesn't apply to this case, no one was going to attack a surfaced American submarine if it was ferrying wounded back to Sri Lanka. NATO now is just benefiting from the bad situation they created>Traditionally submarines were treated like any other ship and would surface for rescue operations>Start attacking surfaced submarines after rescue operations, or have the sinking ships try to attack the submarine during rescue operations>Submarines are no longer expected the surface for rescue operations>These threats never applied to Allied submarines, but now they also get an excuse to leave people to die>Standard carries over to today, even through the threats to submarines surfacing have reduced even further.
>>530112081>Except its allegiance to the Zionist Entity.in a better world israel would not exist for this to be necessary.
>>530105527>Wait.. are we the bad guys?You always were.
>>530105527Nice link nigger.
>>530105527You guys still talking about this? Old news old
>>530106535>he was a gud boi>he was turning his rudder around>dindu nuffin>on his way back from church (hindu dindo temple)>didn't even have ammo for his gunWhy do you sound like a nigger's single mom?
>>530108762>>530108918>it was unarmedyou gullible retardsnobody takes all the guns off a ship and sends it hundreds of miles away with a full crew
>>530105527>may have>MAY>have>no>mother>fucking>sourceeveryone in this thread is a retard
>>530105527those were color revolutionaries, and the numbers are made up, and also it didn't happen but i'm glad it did
>>530106535The sub commander probably waited his whole life to sink an enemy ship with a torpedo like some WW2 shit. Guarantee all the guys on that sub thought they were in Hunt for Red October and will likely have legendary status in navy community now.
>>530105527only matters it you lose.
>>530105527Yes Americans are the bad guys. Pete Hegseth sounds like the bad guy from a karate kid movie.
>>530105527>Wait.. are we the bad guys?always
>>530105527The international cabal of pedophilic cannibals producing nothing of worth, ruining the greatest nation on earth while endlessly villainizing the world factory didn't tip you off?
>>530116926KEK
>>530106535>It is an unarmed ship
>>530105527>May haveGet fucked
>>530105527>>530105527> The 312-foot Dena and its 130-member crew, many of them musicians in the Iranian navy band, had just finished participating in an Indian government naval exercise and cultural exchange that the U.S. Navy had also participated in and were on the way home on Wednesday.Americans truly are fags
>>530118252dindu muffin he awn his wei home frum skeewl tryn get his life on track sheeeit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRIS_Denanote the part where its armaments are listed (you can even see the main gun in the video), and the fact that it is a frigate, a class of warship
>>530105731Anon Iranians are whiter than Americans at this point
>>530107702>but in 1980...KekAnon your nation routinely kills civilians, and did so in lebanon before that
>>530112150>Iran has repeatedly done shit that qualify as declarations of war
>>530106273I'm the good guy I'm against any and all attempts to conjure moloch
There were twinks aboardhttps://x.com/OunkaOnX/status/2029938431984554488
>>530105527OH NO! Are the war police going to come arrest us?
>>530105527We could have radioed to them to surrender the boat or be destroyed out of common courtesy.
>>530107702Bro you eat up state department propaganda like a pro
>our WARSHIP had no ammo so it's an unarmed target
