If one of these gets hit it's pretty much game over.
Oh, you must be a military expert!
>>530128960Not an argument.
Incorrect, you're just saber rattling like an Arab, big words, don't do anything. Israel sunk your aircraft carrier in broad daylight, and then made you apologize for it.You don't get to come back from that, you are all in fact pussies who can't defend yourselves from your enemies.
>>530128886>boomer carrier*sends one hypersonic missle*it's gone
>>530129080Take meds boomer.
>>530129102That's the goal and it's seems like they can achieve it.
>>530129080this
ok since everyone else is just be retard.I will say to you, it's not a game over scenario to lose a carrier. An aircraft carrier, much like sniper or special forces team or mobile armor, is a force multiplier.If you lose one then your force is not divided but it is diminished - but diminished force does not mean the situation becomes unmanageable.To be truly defeated there would need to be zero presence. The air campaign does not rely on the carrier - the carrier merely helps facilitate radar acquisitions, time to mission, and command and control.Am I saying anything too stupid for you? Let me know!
>>530128886What happens to the nuclear reactor if one of these goes down?I've always wondered about that...
>>530128886Hit by what? Iran doesn't have anything that could reliably hit it and so that the hit would cause significant damage.
>>530128886Yeah just wait until the gloves come off.
>>530129453Look up USS Scorpion or USS Thresher
>>530129453Not much. Oceans are pretty good at containing radioactivity.Also, an Aircraft carrier will probably not sink but rather be put out of commission because of damages if it gets hit.The real reason why its "over" is that a majority of US global dominance is based on the assumption that Aircraft carrier fleets are invincible.
>>530128886Right?
>>530129042Oh, you must be an argument expert!
>>530129476>Hit by what? Iran doesn't have anythingIsrael does though
>>530129476Israel just like the uss liberty
>>530128886>IfKeep coping
>>530128886Dream on incel, unlike the Iranian jobbers, Japan actually managed to sink a dozen of US Aircraft Carriers in WWII. The US response? They came back with 100 more.
>>530129042>>530128886It wasnt. He complemented you and you got defensive thinking it was an argument. Very telling.
>>530129739kek
give me 50 top Persian whores with bunda and DSL and I'll have the Gerald Ford sunk 5000ft deep within 6 hours
>>530128886Give me a few diving tanks, a propeller device capable of 40 knots, 30 magnetic mines, and i still wouldn't be able to sink the fucking thing its got like 3500 compartments that can be sealed off its impossible to sink that fucking thingBut i can put it out of operation
>>530129968>>530130005Are they going to use a mossas trained nuclear armed great white shark to also disrupt tourism in the Gulf states in order to dig the sinai canal for greater Israel population density: .5 per sqmi?
>>530130620>>530130620Deep lore on sandnigger schizodry
>>530129446If you lost one of them it means they can take out more. They become useless.
>>530128886Very difficult to hit a carrier. The ADS around is literally inpenetrable. Also Iran has very few missiles remaining. The US and IDF have total air supremacy over Iran now with 24/7 surveillance. If a hypersonic launcher popped out of its hiding spot, it'll get hit. With each passing day there are fewer laucnhers and crews available. Iran also needs exact coordinates which they can't get from China as their comms are severely compromised. A carrier hit would be nice, would make great news and maggats seethe uncontrollably, but highly unlikely.
>>530129102How are we supposed to pay (((MIC)))
>>530128886They're going to sacrifice the USS Lincoln rather than decommission it. In IPetGoat2 there is a scene clearly showing an Iranian war with the shadow of a carrier going down. On March 20 it'll be 1988 weeks old, being launched in 1988. That it is likely date.
>>530128886nothing will happen if they get hit, you'd need a nuke to sink one lol
>>530131693>If a hypersonic launcher popped out of its hiding spot it gets destroyedA fair trade if you manage to cripple or sink a carrier.
>>530129080the USS Liberty?
>>530128886the goyim will happily sacrifice one of their floating military baess in a false flag to justify using nukes
>>530129453This is how Cthulu comes to be and you engulf the world into madness
>>530129080I get what you mean and I agree that muzzies have no balls but the irony of this coming from a mutt is too much. Israel did sink your ship and to this day makes you apologize for antisemitism any time you dare bring it up
Well it did get hit thats why they are rotating the carriers. I think it only sinks if the hit penetrates the hull at the bottom. Extremely unlikely even with a barrage of missiles.
