https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/1772791864-127005962/population-problems-get-serious-due-to-falling-birth-rate/>>Populations are rapidly decreasing in many countries.The Japanese Ministry of Welfare and Labour announced in August last year that the number of children born in the first half of that year decreased by 3.1 percent as compared to the same period of the previous year. The Japanese media expressed concern that the circumstances show no sign of improvement although the authorities say they are taking measures.>Populations lessened by more than half in seven big cities of the US, including Pittsburgh and Detroit, as compared to the 1950s. Detroit has been counted as one of five large cities which might disappear from the earth due to serious population decline.>The number of births dropped to a record low in Finland in 2024. At that time, the statistics agency of the country said that the birth rate reached the lowest index since the start of the recording in 1776, adding that such tendency is pronounced in big cities in particular.
>>530136445has more to do with the corruptions of our society than falling birth rates. birth rate decline is a symptom
you want more population then pay higher wages, make houses affordable, expand and repair infrastructure, increase food supply.but you retards won't. you cry about population because of the boomer notion of "growth." youre the same as liberals that want infinite immigration without planning for it. kil yourself.
> The number of births decreased by over 20 000 in Poland in the same year as against the previous year. It has reportedly reached a record low since the Second World War.>The birth rate has been very low in most of the European countries for the past decades.>A UN official asserted that the birth rate has lessened further than anticipated in some countries and it is more rapidly falling in some areas where it was high.>The birth rate has continued to decrease because people marry late or give up marriage and because even though they marry, women give birth to few or none.>The dropping birth rate has caused many problems.
> According to a report on the prospect of population, the worldwide population increase will stop decades later and the population will continuously decrease thereafter.>One characteristic of such a population change is population aging.>A relevant organ of the UN said that people above 65 years of age worldwide increased from 5.5 percent to 10.2 percent of world population between 1974 and 2024. The rate is considered to increase by 20.7 percent during 50 years from 2024 to 2074.>Such a phenomenon has a negative effect on the socio-economic development of relevant countries.>Expressing concern over the decline in the birth rate, the UN warned that if such a situation continues, it might result in a world population crisis in the future.
>>530136822It’s definitely all of those but also the mass migration (of young MALES escaping conflicts in their homelands), abortion, tranny and homo marriage and cat ladies not marrying or having kids. Overturning roe v wade was a step in the right direction though only a little bit. MAGA!
What's a term for tactic of negotiating with zero intention to strike a deal/make any concession, just running out the clock cuz the status quo benefits you? Sandbagging? Women want precisely zero kids. They just wanna hide that fact to preserve the residual social esteem of muh nurturers muh givers of life. It's demography 101 that you can't pay them to do it. The number would need to be comically high, obviously several times their annual salary (they're openly calling it opportunity cost)
>>530138760Women (and men too nowadays) want an extended childhood where they can play video games with no responsibility or have gay liaisons outside the Walmart restroom. Having a child would infringe on them being able to do that.
>>530136445
>>530138055She fucks human men
>the line has to keep going up>but what about the consequences?>the line has to go upwards
>>530139097>> Abortion in Egypt is highly restricted and generally illegal, categorized as a criminal offense under the penal code (Articles 260–264), unless necessary to save the mother's life. It is permitted only if two doctors certify a threat to the mother’s life, making it one of the most restrictive countries regarding abortion access. >> Immigrating to Egypt is relatively straightforward for short-term stays, as many nationalities can get visas on arrival, but securing long-term residency requires navigating significant bureaucracy. The easiest routes are via employment, investment (investing $50,000−$200,000+$50,000−$200,000+), or marriage. Expect high paperwork demands and a need for patience.>> LGBTQ+ rights in Egypt are heavily restricted, with homosexuality effectively illegal and punishable by up to 17 years in prison with hard labor under "morality" laws. LGBTQ individuals face severe societal discrimination, violence, and state prosecution. While sex reassignment surgery is permitted with religious approval, no legal protections exist for queer individualsWow. Now that’s very interesting. A society with rules we had before 1970 isn’t killing itself and stagnating… hmmm
>>530139329>growing like a cancer is so based and trad
>>530139543It is when you’re in one of the countries mentioned in the above post where growth is negative and 10% of your populace are retirement age who don’t contribute to the economy while foreign migrants with IQs of 60 come in to replace you as slave labor as your ‘dog lady’ refuses to have kids cause she wears the pants in your twisted Libtard relationship.
>>530139745Oh no we might return to the population of 100 years ago.
>>530139020Why is it so hard for you to accept that women just don't want kids? Because your widdle mommy made you sandwiches and fixed your boo-boos? Yeah today she wouldve aborted your faggot ass TWO times
>>530139904>anon doesn’t understand per capita100 years ago the west of the US wasn’t settled yet but 10% of the population definitely weren’t 70+ years old with many cities below replacement level.
>>530139904t. Bitchmade fairy who wouldn't last ten minutes in the living standards of 100yrs ago
>>530136445There is no population problem. Birth rates did decline dramatically, but it happened over 50 years ago when effective birth control became widely available. Birth rates have been extremely stable ever since, far more stable than they ever were before that.The FUD about birth rates is just more jewish nonsense to try to justify the mass importation of millions of browns to replace White people, incels just take the bait on this issue because they are retarded.
>>530136445Just reproduce bro
>>530140080By your logic it would be based and trad to genetically engineer Americans to be 1/10 the size and then turn the United States into a 7 level Hong Kong to fit as many as possible because we don't know how to make the economy sustainable.
>>530136445>although the authorities say they are taking measuresINCREASE THE WORKING HOURSREDUCE THE PAYGIVE WOMEN MORE "RIGHTS"LOOK AT ALL THE WORK WE'RE DOING TO FIX THIS
>>530140200>America is too small By your logic men should just slave and die never experiencing fatherhood or family or legacy. What else even needs to be said to a "man" like you
>>530140370The fact is child havers are the ultimate bag holders in society. They will have to leave them in this hellscape.
>>530140275Yup. You just hit the nail on the head. Japan and most western states too.
>>530136445Nobody cares. It's probably intentional. Humans are unnecessary now that AI and robotics are developed to the point they can finish the work humans started.
>>530136445What model is your bot using?
Quebec had more deaths than births in 2025. Quebec is also one of the most vaccinated province during the Covid
>>530136445>Population problems get serious due to falling birth rateThe problem with low fertility is that it actually causes more low fertility. The problem doesn't just sit there hurting the economy a little... it picks up the pace, accelerates. No matter how low the rate is now, it will be far lower in the future, much more quickly than you can anticipate.And it's below replacement level. Population is shrinking at the rate it is today. Population will not only continue to shrink, it will shrink faster, far faster than anyone right now can believe possible. We're heading towards extinction. The leftoid hippy nightmares of overpopulation were always just horseshit. Jewish lies and manipulations to cause our extinction because they couldn't kill us off in war.
>>530136445Population collapse can't come soon enough.Population collapse is our only hope.
>>530141079>We're heading towards extinction.
>>530140739Which model is YOUR bot using?
>>530141175>Population collapse is our only hope.If population collapses, extinction occurs. There is no hope there, unless you're a nihilist cheering it on. But the word "hope" doesn't really work for those guys. Maybe you're just a jew... they're schizo enough to hope for lunatic outcomes.>>530141184And you're bad at math. Each woman, on average, must have 2.1 kids. If one has only 1 child, another woman has to have 3 to make up for that. This is basic math. When the average is below 2.1, you're heading towards extinction. It doesn't matter that there are a bunch of skyscrapers in some coastal shithole rusting and falling down.
>>530141079Except literally none of that is true. Birth rates have been going up and down since the beginning of time. There isn't some point where it just keeps accelerating downward. It will go up or down until it starts affecting whatever factors are causing it to go up or down and then will start going in the opposite direction.There's also nothing special or magical or definite about muh replacement rate. It's literally just a made up jew number. Fun fact, the official "replacement rate" in developing countries isn't 2.1, it's as high as 3.5, because the whole thing is jew bullshit.
>>530136445We will end feminism whether the kikes will it or not.
>>530141184It also says that when you are replaced by foreigners it is a curse sent by god because of the sin of the people that they refuse to acknowledge, much less repent of.You know, proud people who can do no wrong, like you.
>>530142040>Except literally none of that is true. Birth rates have been going upHere are some truths you're too nigger-brained to understand:1. In humans, there are as many males as females born, or so close as to not matter (chinks and jeets aborting boys excepted).2. This means each female has one male counterpart.3. If that female is to help replace herself and her male counterpart before they die, she must have two children. This can average out, if one female has just one child, but another female has three, that's good enough.4. But 2.0 children isn't quite the replacement rate, because some children die before becoming adults.5. This "fertility rate" (not birth rate, you ignorant fucking simpleton) needs to be 2.1. Every ten couples having, between them all 21 children.6. The fertility rate is easy enough to measure, and it's been below 2.1 for a long time now. But retards like you look at a population of elderly geezers too old to have children and say "but the population is eleventy gorillion!".You flunked math all through school. You have no ability to think about how things really work, but smarter people would describe as "an inability to come up with a correct mental model of the world around him". And, there is only a very small window to turn things around at this point. Just decades. We won't be extinct in decades, the few babies just born can live to be 100 years old, after all, but we will be past the point of no return. If we aren't already.
>>530136445Just don't go out of your way to push feminism. In picrel, the second dip around 1970 is another feminist push. When women had equal rights, they still weren't fucked.
>>530143073
>>530142575No, you are a midwit with illusory superiority who wrongly thinks replacement rate is much more important than it actually is.The population isn't going to collapse just because couples are having slightly less than 2.1 kids on average. Even if it stays below 2.1 for a long time, it still won't cause a significant decrease in overall population for a very long time. And that's only if you are also able to have zero net migration for the same very long time.And even if the overall population did decrease, so what? This whole idea that the population has to keep growing larger forever is also jewish bullshit. It wasn't that long ago that everyone was freaking out over overpopulation and running out of food and water and resources for everyone, and how large swaths of the population were about to be made obsolete and unemployed from automation and AI. But now suddenly if we don't have infinite population growth, civilization is going to go into an irreversible death spiral because the birth rate dropped below some arbitrary, made up number? It's bullshit anon. More jewish nonsense. (You) took the bait and think it is a serious problem because you (wrongly) think the solution to this "problem" will involve you being assigned a tradwife by the state. You shill the FUD and propaganda for the jews, without seeming to realize that the actual solution they will offer for this "problem" is importing infinite shitskins to every White country.
>>530136822>>530138581wherever I go I meet elderly boomers in theri 70s still working, complaining their 95yo wwii veteran dad shat himself in the old folks home again and doesn't remember his own name. They can't retire because their house is worth 800k and they didn't save for retirement after the big divorce 20 years ago or some such shit because they were too busy, idk really.But the reason is that in order for the boomer ponzi to work, you can't have higher wages. Higher wages means boomers who didn't save for retirement have to pay more, they can't afford this without taking a lifestyle hit such as retiring and selling their old house to move in with their adult kids (using the house money to help avoid burdening their kids and grandkids of course) or move into a retirement community where the average house only costs 100k or something (they literally have affordable housing for 64+yos lmao fml). Thy can't afford to have suburban houses near cities lose value, or sell for less than 800k, because they need the money to -eventually- retire when their brain starts to rot and they physically can't hold down a job anymore and Goldberg Jr. (aged 49) takes over for Goldberg Sr. (aged 80) and doesn't feel like keeping his dad's employees around just because they worked there their entire lives.So basically the system will cannibalize itself- millennials and younger gen xers already got cannibalized since 2003 and are too odl to have kids- by preventing the youth from starting lives unless you are explicitly a doctor or became an SWE before vibe coding and jeets took over.
>>530136445whats the solution? mass immigration?
>>530140739Pyongyang Times is literally the only modern news source which is outside of ideology (because of the secluded nature of its host country it means that this newspaper doesn't exist to line pockets or have a political agenda to support one western party over the other).
>>530144028It says right here why>The birth rate has continued to decrease because people marry late or give up marriage and because even though they marry, women give birth to few or none.The solution is not having a gov like in west Europe nations which pushes abortion and decadent liberal ideology.
>>530143920>who wrongly thinks replacement rate is much more important than it actually is.>The population isn't going to collapse just because couples are having slightly less than 2.1 kids on average. It's not "slightly less". It's catastrophically less. When the number is 2, even tiny fractions below replacement rate matter, dumbass. When it's 1.0, each generation is half the size of the previous.And your favorite niggers in central Africa with their high fertility rates can't save the human race, even if you count them as human... they can't maintain a functioning technological civilization. Once the rest of us are gone and they have no free humanitarian aid from across the Atlantic Ocean, they crater too. This isn't goddamned rocket science.>And even if the overall population did decrease, so what? Because it doesn't decrease a little and stop immediately, it decreases for-fucking-ever, imbecile. The only number it cannot decrease below is zero.>This whole idea that the population has to keep growing larger foreverWhich is no idea I even hinted at. I'm talking about replacement rate... when that fertility level is reached, population neither grows nor shrinks. It's like you can't even understand simple words.>It wasn't that long ago that everyone was freaking out over overpopulation The jewish lies told to scare us into extincting ourselves?>More jewish nonsense.As much as I hate to say it, seems like the jews will win. Because you're too stupid to not fall for their tricks.>you (wrongly) think the solution to this "problem" will involve you being assigned a tradwife by the state. I'm already married, we have two children. We would have had more, but got a late start. My oldest will probably give me my first grandchildren within 10 years. >You shill I speak truth, even though it does no good. The jews have made you too stupid (public schooling is run by them) to see the danger, and too apathetic to care even if you did.
>>530136445They can keep worrying and lamenting this fact, but unless starting a family is going to be something attractive again it will do nothing. No other generation since at least the 1900s has owned less than millenials and zoomers. Maybe things will change when the average person isn't strangled by financial burdens.As for Japan, at some point the nips will have to realize their culture is fucked and need to do... something. Fuck if I know how you'd tackle it. Less suicidal work culture? Actual financial benefits for young parents? Fucking something other than importing jeets and niggers.
>>530143920>>And even if the overall population did decrease, so what? This whole idea that the population has to keep growing larger forever is also jewish bullshit.You out yourself as a moron in this post and everything you say should be disregarded. They wouldn't bring it up at the UN if it weren't a serious issue. When the age of people in your nation fluctuates and you have only elderly people who never had kids and barely any young people then who's going to run the country? Migrants brought in from Iran and India maybe...
>>530136445billions must die
>>530144679>It's not "slightly less". It's catastrophically less. There is nothing catastrophic that suddenly happens below 2.1. >When the number is 2, even tiny fractions below replacement rate matter, dumbass. No, not really. It would have to stay well below 2 for a long time for there to be a significant population decline, and that's just not likely in the real world.>When it's 1.0, each generation is half the size of the previous.It's not 1.0, and almost certainly never will be 1.0, at least not long enough for it to matter. >Because it doesn't decrease a little and stop immediately, it decreases for-fucking-ever, imbecile.No, it doesn't. You are just making an autistic assumption about what will happen based on circular logic. You think that if the fertiliity rate stays below 2.0 indefinitely, then it will inevitably lead to population collapse. But that doesn't mean that if the fertiliity rate goes below 2.0 it will inevitably lead to irrecoverable population collapse. Population collapse happens in your hypothetical because you start from the artificial premise that fertility rate will stay below 2.0 indefinitely, regardless of whatever else is happening. But that isn't how it works in the real world
>>530146350>and almost certainly never will be 1.0, at least not long enough for it to matter.
>>530139141yes
>>530146350>There is nothing catastrophic that suddenly happens below 2.1.South Korea is below 1.0. Is that not catastrophic? Most of east Asia is there or so close as to not matter. Large portions of Europe are close enough to that as to not matter. Low fertility causes even lower fertility. Kids who grow up in a low fertility nation internalize low fertility and then grow up to exhibit even lower fertility. >It would have to stay well below 2 for a long timeAnd what makes that impossible, exactly? What is it that you imagine is so magically awesome about the civilization you live in here in the US that it will only dip down below 2 for a short time and rebound? Because when you ignore immigration, the US has been there for a long time. I guess as long as you're replaced with jeets and niggers and shitskins that's just ok, you can pretend it's not happening.>But that doesn't mean that if the fertiliity rate goes below 2.0 it will inevitably lead to irrecoverable population collapse. Because what? People will suddenly change and want a bunch of kids even as the economy melts down around them? Even here on fucking /pol/ you have people saying they wouldn't have kids even if they could because they'd be stranding them in a hellworld. In this fucking thread. How much more obvious do you need it to be? Fucking normie Kurzgesagt has started to catch on, years ago even, and you're still burying your head in the sand.
all "birth rate" conversation is an excuse to justify immigrants. do you think the tech bros and kalergi bankers are going to wait 18 years for your human capital to grow up? they don't even want to educate or train the native population
>>530136445>>530136579>>530136822>>530138283>>530138361>>530138581>>530138760>>530139020stop allowing women to compete with men for workplace wages and birthrates fix themselves in one year. nothing else will work, every other solution is folly. jews know this, its why its never the point of these shill threads. its always lower age of consent or adjust tax policy. none of that works. take them out of the workplace and make them seek a mate to provide for them as nature intended. every country that puts women to work has their birthrate crash. its why beaners come to the US having 5 kids per generation on average and after 1 generation here they go to under 2 on average. stop letting women compete with mens for wages or college opportunities. get them out of politics, do not let them vote. this is just common sense but the kikes spamming these threads will never suggest this because they know it would work.
birth-rate, age-of-consent and race-mix shills don't want to talk about their vast population of excess males, damning evidence of a backward culture and suggestive of your daughters' fate if their infestations are not controlled in your country
>>530148201>all "birth rate" conversation is an excuse to justify immigrants.When I talk about it, I don't justify immigrants. I'd be happy if not a single immigrant was allowed to stay here. Even if it hurts tourism. Shut that shit down.Has it ever occurred to you that the shylocks might be using two tricks against you simultaneously? If you believe that we are suffering a population collapse, they trick you into reluctantly accepting importing gigantic hordes of jeets, and if you don't accept it they laugh behind your back about the extinction that will ensue?They're not even technically lying to you, but whichever way you believe it's bad for you.
>>530148594it occurred to me that this thread is pajeet spam and you're playing into it like a chump
>>530148824This picrel is especially hilarious to me. I work in an industry where I have the misfortune of running into many jeet coworkers and other adjacents (the number of contractors, both locally and remote, would appall you). And somehow, it seems there must be 4-6 times as many males as females.
>>530150194the obscene mass migrations are the indian solution to this problem. keeping millions and millions of disenfranchised surplus males in the country is a shitstorm waiting to happen. but if they're all shipped to other people's countries then it's other people's problem
>>530136445corporations could easily mass produce people and do it very cheaply and efficiently.
>>530148512They aren't ready for this truth. They don't even talk about the dishonest Civil Rights Act turning white men into the only unprotected class, thus ending civil rights for white men. It was possible to ignore all that in the late 60's. I wonder how much longer that deep inequality can go on as whites become an ever shrinking minority.
if you wanted me to start a family, you persuaded me exactly the wrong way by flooding my continent with third world izzat bugs. js try something else
it will always be much more efficient to subtract population. relatively instant
>>530150906They, the Jew and Goy elite, did not want more white men to compete against. So they forced integration on all common white people and wrote hate crime laws to punish resistance to integration. But that was 60 years ago or so. All industrial and post industrial societies are below replacement AND all white countries have been and are still being flooded with non whites. But for the elite something unspeakable is happening. Their replacement migrants are noticing the common whites have nothing worth taking. They weren't supposed to notice. They won't stay obedient as white guards get ever scarcer. Look at the Leftists who protested Israel a few years back. That was way off script and it cost many Leftist institutions their Jewish Money, Jewish Lawyers and favorable coverage from the Jewish Press. Palpable waves of rage, hate, shame, fear and grief reverberated through the elite. They know they have derailed civilization and can't put it back on the tracks. They can only pray for an unlikely soft crash. They are no Gods. They have failed utterly. You have until the Great Boomer Die Off in the 2040's to secure what you can. Empires don't wreck as quickly as trains.
>>530150495No one wants Indians here. We want liberal social reforms like roe v Wade and the others repealed. Third world looks like this >>530139543 because they never had that garbage in first place.
>>530150495>the obscene mass migrations are the indian solution to this problem. keeping millions and millions of disenfranchised surplus males in the country is a shitstorm waiting to happen. but if they're all shipped to other people's countries then it's other people's problemI'm perfectly fine with it being their problem. The Himalayas wall them in pretty good by land, how many naval vessels to patrol their shores and make sure none escape?>>530152068>They know they have derailed civilization and can't put it back on the tracks.I'm glad I'm not the only one. The kikes really did miscalculate. Not that this will necessarily do us any good.>ou have until the Great Boomer Die Off in the 2040's to secure what you can. Empires don't wreck as quickly as trains.I hope we have until the 2040s. Can it last that long?
>>530152405I don't really know. My thinking due to being raised by white progressives who cackled with glee every time they read about whites shrinking in number is that such people will have to die off before anything can be done to create large white communities again. Their anti white agenda is backed up by all Western governments. Don't underestimate them. In the 2040's, with most Boomers dead including the Progressive Jew and Goy elite, the non whites will try for direct power grabs while the few remaining whites won't have their own parents and local leaders to attack the slightest hint of people trying to create white communities. The elite stayed very light skinned so anti white ideologies will come back to bite them hard. This will shatter their children's faith in multiracialism as elite children will be the target of the future darkie rebellions. Which means those children won't be working tirelessly to eradicate the last few white people. Time will tell.
Can you imagine the 2060s, 2070s and 2080s when millennials die en masse?
