How did they fake this before AI?
>>530183089just conventional explosives mostly leftovers from ww2
>>530183089energy weapons
Making nuclear weapons is not a fundamentally complicated thing
>he doesn't even know the difference between visual effects and special effectsngmi
>>530183089Same way they did in the movies. With real nuclear bombs.
>>530183089even nolan couldn't fake a nuclear explosion convincingly, which is why oppenheimer was a shit movie>muh cg is bad
>>530183197Das hubris lol affectionate even. Uwu faggot lmao
>>530183089Stop-Motion Animation & Miniatures, Optical & Transparency Effects, Rear Projection, Forced Perspective, the Optical Printer etc.
>>530183223Genius.
They used miniature models, explosives, and camera effects. You know, like what they do with movies.
>>530183089That is a nice piece of broccoli anon
>>530183266>:44>66I don't understand your zoomspeak, but I repect your digits, bro.
>>530183089Large tank of water and some ink/painthttps://effectscorner.blogspot.com/2009/02/cloud-tank-effect.html
>>530183089>>530183183>>530183223Nukes don't exist.
>>530183334how come movies still can't do convincing nuclear explosions? certainly with practical effects
>>530183089>>530183089Forced perspective
>>530183089>before AI?anon...
one could argue with the improvement in modern tech including sensors and cameras one of the nuke powers would have done a surface detonation recently , the updated data would have to be valuable.i know nuke treaties and such
>>530183428yeah, but santa is real
>>530183089How did they fake this b4 AI?
>>530183089that was just a big grain elevator explosion
>>530183428Wow so profound
>>530183089With low poly camera.
