[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_7608.jpg (98 KB, 686x386)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
why is there a US battleship completely entombed in remote USSR/Russian stone mountains, that is claimed to be a ‘memorial’ unveiled in 1972, just years after the (so called) Montauk Project “hoax”. The cover story is complete unbelievable.
>>
ignore this just ignore it
some things are better off to be left alone

there are a few rabbitholes that you just raatgeer.. yeah lets not
>>
>>530351710
>a US battleship
Prove it's a US and not a Soviet ship.
>>
>>530351710
I've seen pics of these things on the north coast of Russia. They were dummy ship sterns that were meant to trick any enemy warships coming around the coast into thinking there was a Russian ship there



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.