Our problem, The answer.Over the last 20 years I have watched the American Dream fold into a grotesquery on par with that Dark age Feudalism. Young Men and women work more hours, losing themselves before they ever had a chance to find eachother... The naive would have you believing this is a natural result of capitalism. I'm here to Describe to you, with reasoning that escapes media, both mainstream and social, why Capitalism is not the problem, but it is Neo-Feudalism which restricts society and drives the modern man and woman to cathartic existentialism.It is only when the fractional reserve system is manipulated via bailouts, that capitalism fails to be capitalism, and becomes socialism for the upper class... When risky investors use the fractional reserve system to borrow more money than they are good for, and their bets they make on assets such as real estate fail, they are bailed out by government. This allows the overly-risky investors to keep those assets indefinitely, acting as wage suppression for the middle and lower classes via artificially supported housing prices. They steal wealth from future generations by bailing out these loans and destroying the balance of the free market and credit system with the "fed put". these are the actions by which the upper class have tilted the balances of the banking system in their favor, injecting unnatural risk into the free market, and destroying a banking system that was intended for the working class.
Had more investors been allowed to fail after the great financial crisis of 2008, the multi-mortgage holding landlords would have been forced to sell those houses to the highest bidder -- the working class who rent such homes, and give them their value. The sudden increased supply would dramatically lower the cost of those houses. Instead these loan-holders bailed themselves out, allowing them to keep the assets underwritten on those loans at a time when they didnt have the collateral to match them. Thus allowing them to make even more capital via rent on those houses, which then allowed them to buy even more stocks and rental homes, while the working class toils to pays the debts. Its as if the Collateral on the landlords rental homes, is the homes themselves AND the renters therein... There is a paradox in which the very value these rent seekers find in those homes, is carried by that of the renter because he can not afford to outbid his elders on the loan. If the worker owned the home, he would not be renting it, and there wouldnt be such value. These bailouts have generated an artificial value, such that the houses exist in artificial scarcity. Without these bailouts, your rent would be a mortgage at a lower cost. Instead you are trapped giving the value to these homes, simply because you didnt exist earlier and you have no other choice. It is key that you take your time to understand this paradox, as its importance bears the difference in you existing as a slave of the machine, or as the Patriarch & Matriarch of your own progeny.
No, it is not as simple as just stopping all bailouts, as the bailouts do serve the purpose of keeping the economy and thus society from collapsing into the dark ages.-- During the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, in reality, we were offered the severe choice, and only that choice, of handing the country over to our elders, or losing the economic system of labor and trade that provides us sustenance. Alongside, the fear that if we did not act to bail out those assets, a foreign element, such as the Chinese, would manipulate their own currency, a bailout of their own, printing trillions, in order to buy up those failing American assets, while the Americans sat penniless. Such a consequence left the under-educated-over-employed to the only rational conclusion of tagging along in a Generational-feudal system which has become.I am not calling for an end to fractional reserve banking. The opposite,, asking for a beginning. This fractional reserve banking system was created in order to give the working man an opportunity to own a home. It was designed so that he would own his home up front, while paying for it with his labor over a lifetime... Now that same system has been turned against him, allowing older generations to enslave the unborn. There is no longer opportunity for the common man, instead it is reserved for those lucky enough to be born gifted, the nepotic and the sociopathic.
No. i did not name the jew... The problem we have is not a Jewish problem but a generational one. One where children are born into slavery. One where the fruits of technological advancements are not fed to the young and restless, but instead the fat and under burdened... The working man is no longer allowed a single drop of his own existence returned to him in the form of relief, from the very technological automation he slaves to create. Instead he is nourished by the sweat from his own brow, and encouraged by the strength of his ability to work harder than his neighbor, while being robbed of his freedoms and robbed of a system which could support every man woman and child without the wastes of Neo-feudalism. He is an indentured servant under the guise of the American Dream.There are many consequences beyond the undeserved peasantry --Such a system will surely lead to the collapse of the American dollar. Such a system has suppressed birth rates and driven men and women apart. Not allowing for our generation to even bear children, WHILE SOME AMONG OUR ABUSERS SEEK BARE-CHILDREN... We work obscene hours in professions which were intended to be superior to subsistence farming, yet they are no longer. We have no choice but to commit to living smaller then our parents, while having less time for our own children. Meanwhile the machine we labor on, has the capability to build itself. -- Why then must we work now more hours than a time when these imposter-banks did not exist? Why then do our parents deserve to drink the wine of the machine, while the worker bleeds his being into it?
>when the system works, it worked because it's capitalism>when the system doesn't work, it's because it's not really capitalismcircular logic works because circular logic worksretard schizo thread
Next time just contact a publisher bro. If you want to write a book you may as well get paid for it.
>>530371795He is totally right though. Banks and associated institutions getting bailed out by the government can not be attributed to a flaw of the free market.
>>530371674>>530371724>>530371749>>530371772Blah blah blah.I have small amount.You have big amount.Now I'm pissed.The average person doesn't give a fuck.
>>530373317you can't dissociate the government from the system from which the government sprangit's the same argument commies use, what stalin did was not true communismit's a ridiculous argument, there will never be 100% pure unadulterated capitalism, nor 100% pure communism, it's always a mixthe fundamental question is: were bailouts part of capitalism? like are they some sort of natural consequence of it? when the people running the government participate in the free market themselves they have an incentive to take certain measures. capitalism certainly places a great deal of importance on "confidence". money flows when people have confidence that the money will keep flowing, if confidence is eroded then the whole system grinds to a halt. you cannot honestly tell me this is not an accurate read on current stage capitalism.the other argument, that bailouts are fundamentally distinct from capitalism, and represent the line in the sand at which point this starts becoming a different system, that's not something i'll believe easily.i don't think we are in disagreement, we all know that something died with the bailouts, and/or was rotten before that. it's just a matter of semantics. we are transitioning onto a new phase, one in which the bailouts were either a one time thing, or will become the norm. if they become the norm, then yes, this shit is no longer free market capitalism. and the answer is most certainly not going back to capitalism, the system that bred this degeneracy in the first place.
