The problem is not people from this or that race, but structural racism/racial supremacy.The same goes for misoginy, the problem is not men or women, but the system (both patriarchy or matriarchy can be bad if it denies other people's freedom).Heteronormativity (or a supposed "homonormativity") is also bad because of the same reasons.The individuals are not the problem, people have its own rights to identity and culture, but the problem is always structural (such as capitalism, for instance).It is wrong because it simply is not the true. These are fake ideas that try to pass as truth but actually hold society and people's freedom and development back.
>>530396467I know this is kinda obviousbut sometimes it is good to express this in these words
>>530396467RIGHT WING BASICShttp://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pi20Rr9_BxBbMIfcZUTTGslfZTifEiCmgoogle drive easy to use interfacedownload the whole blob or pick and choose
You need to get your head out of a book and live real life. Some groups of people are just scum and the system treats them preferentially, bending over backwards to cater to them, yet they are still scum. The problem is not the system,
Society must have some form of structure. The will of the nation should generally agree on it. Problems arise when that system becomes corrupt. Vigilance against corruption is what we lost, long ago.TKD, and then we can TND.
>>530398061yeah but I also believe neglecting people's rights are also bad and makes things worse.>>530398309we can have some kind of fair system, I think that's the idea of modernity all along
>>530398061selective attention, which is why much of the wokeshit is now staged for provocation.>>530396467part of structural constraints must be resolved at the level of the individual sooner or later. there is no either/or. there is a gradient from the individual to the collective, with those in positions of power and a desire to see whatever change being the best-positioned to effect it, for better or worse. they are also in a position to alleviate energy demands on those who are less fortunate if they have sufficiently comprehensive understanding.
>>530396467yes, so structural, very intersectional