This is illegal, what the fuck. This is protected under freedom of speech.
Jeet means victory
Rare jeet W
>>530406276Durgasoft means java. Java means durgasoft.
>>530406167>freedom of speechThat's cool but what US laws say about freedom of bodily movements? Because that's what he did.
>>530406432Jail Nagoor Babu SirJai Hind
>>530406167I would imagine they're charging him with desecration of a national monument
It constitutes a disturbance of the peace, on specifically hallowed ground, because it is manifest irreverence for the honored dead.Like, you can't just walk into a church when worship services are being held and start screaming "there is no god" and disturbing the proceedings, or record yourself doing a dance before the pulpit. That is not protected speech.You'll be arrested and charged. It's kind of like that, but not quite.You could do that almost anywhere else, but not in a place which is consecrated and legally reserved. Where there is a strict standard for public conduct and decorum, respectful of the dedication.
>>530406350From prosecutions from the state it certainly does. Most likely this story is fake and gay.
>>530406167Go back, you disgusting piece of walking shit.
why deport them when you could just shoot them in the face to save the paperwork hassle
>>530406167it's freedom of speech, not freedom of jeets
>>530406167No, the Indian man (Madhu Raju) who went viral for dancing at the National World War II Memorial is not facing deportation directly because of the dance itself. The dance video sparked massive backlash for being seen as disrespectful at a solemn site honoring WWII veterans, leading to him deleting his social media accounts (TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn) and reportedly losing his job at Palo Alto Networks.The potential deportation risk stems from H-1B visa rules violations, not the dance. Multiple reports and discussions indicate he was running a side business—a paid dance studio called MAD Dallas (or similar)—where he taught classes and earned income outside his sponsoring employer. H-1B visas strictly limit work to the petitioning employer and prohibit unauthorized employment or side businesses for pay. This alleged violation came under scrutiny partly because the viral video drew attention to him.Key points from recent coverage (as of early March 2026):He was employed as a Cloud Network Security Engineer at Palo Alto Networks on an H-1B visa.The dance was part of a "Don't Rush Challenge" reel, but the location caused outrage.No official confirmation of actual deportation has occurred yet—reports describe it as "may face," "likely to face," or "possible" deportation, with US authorities reviewing his visa status.The dance may have indirectly triggered the investigation by putting a spotlight on him, but the core issue is the alleged unauthorized income from the dance studio.In short: The dance got him noticed and criticized, but any deportation proceedings would be due to the H-1B violation (side hustle), not the act of dancing at the memorial. This has also reignited broader online debates about H-1B rules and compliance among visa holders.lmao eat shit jeet
>>530406167>NOOOOO YOU CANT JUST DANCE IN FRONT OF THE GIANT PHALLUS OF GOYCATTLE SACRIFICE
>>530406167Freedom of speech applies to citizens
Jeets are so vomit inducing. Its truly astounding.
>>530410949and there it is. Freedom of speech being used to try and cover up a deeper issue like it usually is. It happens every damn time.
>>530411296>>530411037>>530410949We here at /pol/ will defend the rights of non-citizen browns to our dying breaths to be contrarian to le miga. If it made miga mad, I would suck these fine indian gentlemen off.
>>530412305You would do that regardless you disgusting faggot and we all know it.>Memeflag
>>530406167I don't see the problem. Seems like conservative anti free speech behaviour. The left should be mad about this, but they don't care about freedom, I guess.
>>530413145>itt the niggers of nu/pol/ defend jeets and oppose deporting jeetsThis is a new low.
"Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech"Nothing about that says the president can't revoke visas. Visas are a privilege, not a right, and can be revoked at any point by the president for any reason.
>>530406276Not to us it doesn't.
>>530413645Revoke the jeet
