Who is it easier to corruptOne man?or a Parliament?Hard Mode - the "one man" is no longer 12th century brute, and is fully conscious that international psy games are taking place, him being one of the targets
>>530413940That cannot be answered conclusively unless you want one purely based on statistics.>le science says at least 80% of men can be bribedThat means there's a 20% chance you can't corrupt the one guy, and a 0% chance you can't corrupt the parliament, since 80% is above even a 2/3 majority.Corrupting the parliament will however be more expensive and effortful.
>>530414821that depends on what you consider to be science (translation: the authority on the matter)here is my translation:there is not a single one parliament known to me, at least for a country of any importance, that is already not corrupted, sold out, in the middle of ending their own nationality, their own peoples they are supposedly "representing"on the other hand, I can see dozens, hundreds, maybe thousands even examples of singular personages who, out of their own stubbornness, conviction or weirdness - played against all the easy-to-fall-to forces of their timesseems an easy distinction, no?
>>530413940Cute grill
>>530413940Parliament is filled with a lot if one man
>>530415699thank you for you wisdom mr american
