The more of you that submit to Rome and the one true apostolic church, the less power Satanic Jews will have.>Anti Jew wars>Against faggotry >Promotes family values >Cures degeneracy >repels niggers because it encourages fatherhood>ZoG Evangelical cucks hate it>puts women in their place and encourages dumb bitches to shut the fuck up>responsible for the Crusades>responsible for the inquisitionWhy don’t you get Baptized this week /pol/?
>>530419766The Catholic Church is not the Church of Christ. The Catholics are responsible for CENSORING, TORTURING, IMPRISONING, EXECUTING anyone caught reading, translating, teaching the Bible. They were not in the business of teaching. They were in the business of controlling and keeping in the dark. Guess what book the Catholic Church had in their Index Librorum Prohibitorum? By the time the printing press was invented the Catholic Church's tirade of banning the Bible was over. I owe the printing press my origins.The Catholic Church's "holy" history is actually based on a lot of forgeries they made up to rise to power and uphold it. The Bible would have destroyed that power if everyone found out that all those "letters" of Church Fathers were frauds.See: The False DecretalsCatholic encyclopediahttp://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05773a.htm>And even though it must be admitted that the popes benefited by the forgeries, their good faith is beyond question.The foundation of their history is based on forgeries. The church of the Bible is not the Catholic Church. That was a forgery.
>>530420240Just tie the millstone around your neck and throw yourself into the sea. It would be better. Protestants are of the devil.
>>530419766>the catholic church will solve the catholic churchGreat. When are you killing yourselves?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=94syrs_VbbU
>>530420480I'm not a Protestant. Protestants are not Christians neither. The Bible determines who the true sect is. Anyone that follows the Bible to a T. The Bible determines who the correct followers are and who are counterfeit. If any "Christianity" believes in:>Trinity>Jesus is God>Hell>Immortal Soul>Getting involved in politics>military services>voting>taking office>Christmas>Pagan holidays>Censor Gods name>refuse to preach>evolution>faith without works>Apostolic Succession>miracles>healing>tithing>mass>refuse political neutrality>predestinationThen they are not Christians. The Bible is against all that. So 99.99% of all sects are counterfeit. Almost all these beliefs originated in Ancient Babylon before the confusion of languages. Once the languages were confused everyone took these beliefs with them around the world.
>>530421002Let me get this straight, you condemn the Catholic Church as not Christian but consider a book they compiled and said was the Bible to be the be all end all of being a Christian? Sounds like bullshit logic to me.
>>530419766Roman catholic = Christian paganismAnd that is a good European thing
>>530421455The Bible already had an established canon before the Catholic and Protestant churches came along.>OTJewish tradition credits Ezra with beginning the compiling and cataloging of the canon of the Hebrew Scriptures, and it says that this was completed by Nehemiah. Ezra was certainly well equipped for such a work, being one of the inspired Bible writers himself as well as a priest, scholar, and official copyist of sacred writings. (Ezra 7:1-11)>“We do not possess myriads of inconsistent books, conflicting with each other. Our books, those which are justly accredited, are but two and twenty, and contain the record of all time. Of these, five are the books of Moses, comprising the laws and the traditional hisstory from the birth of man down to the death of the lawgiver. . . . From the death of Moses until Artaxerxes, who succeeded Xerxes as king of Persia, the prophets subsequent to Moses wrote the history of the events of their own times in thirteen books. The remaining four books contain hymns to God and precepts for the conduct of human life.” - The Jewish historian Josephus, in answering opponents in his work Against Apion, around 100 CE (I, 38-40 )>NTIn the first century C.E., letters from Paul, James, Peter, John, Jude, and the governing body in Jerusalem contributed to the growth and the preservation of the unity and cleanness of the Christian congregation.—Ac 15:22-31; 16:4, 5; 2Co 7:8, 9; 10:8-11; 2Co 3:7; Ac 28:21; 2Th 2:2; Heb 13:22. All those were compiled.The oldest known reference to the NT Bible canon is the Muratorian Fragment which dates back to 170-200 CE. The Fragment mentions a non-Biblical book, the Shepherd, and states that a man named Hermas wrote it “very recently, in our times, in the city of Rome.” Scholars date the final writing of Hermas’ Shepherd between 140 and 155 C.E.The RCC didn't compile the Bible. God compiled it himself.
>>530421455>>530421875The Tosefta, a written collection of oral laws that was completed by about 300 C.E., says with regard to Christian writings that were burned on the Sabbath:>“The books of the Evangelists and the books of the minim[thought to be Jewish Christians] they do not save from a fire. But they are allowed to burn where they are, they and the references to the Divine Name which are in them.”This same source quotes Rabbi Yosé the Galilean, who lived at the beginning of the second century C.E., as saying that on other days of the week,>“one cuts out the references to the Divine Name which are in them [understood to refer to the Christian writings] and stores them away, and the rest burns.”The Jews admitted that the Jewish Christian not only had their own books between the 1st and 2nd century but those books also had Gods name in it at the time. The Bible was done and collected by the 1st century.
ack-
>>Anti Jew warsFalse.>>Against faggotryFalse.>>Promotes family valuesFalse.>>Cures degeneracyFalse.>>repels niggers because it encourages fatherhoodFalse.>>ZoG Evangelical cucks hate itWho wouldn't?>>puts women in their place and encourages dumb bitches to shut the fuck upCruel and retarded.>>responsible for the Crusades>>responsible for the inquisitionHow is that a good thing?
>>530421875>>530421912Scripture is indeed Divinely inspired. But the Catholic Church decided what books are in the Bible I own. Luther took some out for the Protestant canon. The early church was made up of Apostles chosen by Jesus himself. Then it grew from there. As evidenced in the Bible through Acts and the rest of the letters and epistles. This early church called themselves Christians. Then in 107 they started using the name Catholic. Which means universal. It’s the universal church founded by Christ himself. There’s a direct line of Apostolic succession from St Peter himself to the Pope today. For fifteen hundred years or so all Christians were Catholic. Then the reformation came and it was squashed like early heretical ideas were. Like the gnostics. The eastern churches broke from Rome and some came back. Others didn’t. The Roman Catholic Church is what we Americans think of when we think Catholic. They’re the largest group. But there are like 28 other rites that are equally Catholic.
>>530422998*wasn’t squashed like earlier heretical ideas.
>>530419766Your biggest Saint Mother Theresa spent her life feeding and breeding jeets.Catholicism will lead to the replacement of the world by jeets.
>>530423334catholics want japanese to go extinct
>>530423387catholics push lgbt and diversity
>>530419766No thanks, baptism is not needed. I will read my bible and trust in God, not your Saturnian Rome.
>>530422998>Scripture is indeed Divinely inspired. But the Catholic Church decided what books are in the Bible I own.You literally just ignored everything I posted. >>530421875 >>530421912 There is literal evidence the Bible canon was already established by the end of the 1st century. Even the Jews between the 1st through 3rd century admitted the Christians between that time had their own books. The Roman Catholic "Church" was not really in effect as an organization in the first couple hundred years of the Christian Church. The Christian church was under persecution and official church gatherings were risky business in the Roman Empire. Catholicism as an organization with a central figure located in Rome did not occur for quite some time, in spite of its false claim they can trace the papacy back to Peter.The term "catholic" began to be used of the Church at least by the 2nd century by the early Church father, St. Ignatius of Antioch. But since there were no other Christians, there wasn't a need to make a distinction of a particular kind of church.The institutional church began in 313 with the Edict of Milan when Emperor Constantine legalized Christianity (and all other religions) within the Roman Empire or in 380 when Christianity became the official religion of the empire.But no, the original Christians were not Catholic as the Catholic doctrine heavily contradicts the Bible itself. Pic related.
>>530422998>There’s a direct line of Apostolic succession from St Peter himself to the Pope today.“in the strict sense, the apostles left no successor,...“historical evidence does not exist for the entire chain of succession of church authority...: “The corruption of the papal court under unworthy men approaches the incredible [unbelievable]. ... the adventurers and bandits who were elected to the papacy had no interest in affirming spiritual leadership of any kind.” - Catholic Scholar John L. McKenzie, professor of theology at Notre Dame, "The Roman Catholic Church" (New York, 1969), p. 4.“whenever it [the term “apostle”] is applied to individuals in later Christian literature, the use of the term is metaphorical. The church has never had apostles in the N[ew] T[estament] sense since the first century.”—The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, edited by G.A. Buttrick, 1962, Vol. 1, p. 172.“Historical evidence does not exist for the entire chain of succession of church authority.”—John McKenzie, The Roman Catholic Church (New York, 1969), p. 4.“... the scarcity of documents leaves much that is obscure about the early development of the episcopate ...”—The New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967), Vol. I, p.696.There's actually no evidence of Apostolic Succession. The reason why people thought there was is because The Catholic Church forged documents "proving" they were the one true Church.The Catholic Church's "holy" history is actually based on a lot of forgeries they made up to rise to power and uphold it. The Bible would have destroyed that power if everyone found out that all those "letters" of Church Fathers were frauds.See: The False DecretalsCatholic encyclopediahttp://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05773a.htm>And even though it must be admitted that the popes benefited by the forgeries, their good faith is beyond question.The foundation of their history is based on forgeries. The church of the Bible is not the Catholic Church. That was a forgery.
>>530419766Until 1550 Christians used to have Concubines (that was 2/3 of the holy roman's empire lifespan). Thereafter they enforced monogamy and celibacy.... How does something persist without having any children? Well, if you read Agrippas Books you'll learn they passed laws which allowed women to cuckold their husbands right around the time they enforced monogamy and celibacy. (what an odd coincidence).
>>530423901
>>530419766the priest touched me
>>530423901Christianity is a cult which enforces cuckolding.Also: they have Transvestite saints.
>>530423714Jesus comes and establishes His church. He ascends to heaven and leaves the apostles in charge. They stay hidden to a point but many early Christians, including the Apostles except John and the first Popes, are martyred. The Church continues to grow. More persecution. Constantine legalizes Christianity. The Church can be open and it grows. They call themselves Catholic. They decide what books from an established group of potential texts should be in their Bible. Ideas like yours are what happens when a central authority to interpret the Bible and establish dogmas of the faith isn’t established. Everyone interprets things differently and sometimes quite wrongly. I think I’ll trust the church started by my Lord and Savior with things like this. Secular history largely backs it up.
>>530419766>>ZoG Evangelical cucks hate itIt's true. They can't shut up about the evils of Catholicism.
>>530419766where do you even get your christ, bro?https://www.bitchute.com/video/biSY2OEAuOVz
>>530423875That’s anti Catholic bigotry. The Church has had its share of horrible leaders. Men who lusted for power or money. Like literally every other human undertaking. The fact it’s still around and going strong points to Divine Guidance. The Apostles are in the New Testament, man. We even know their names. You can see St Peter’s bones in the catacombs under St Peter’s basilica. They absolutely kept track of the line of succession. It’s easy to find.
>>530423901>>530423929>>530423994Go back to your containment zone. >>530421515>>530424395Ideas like yours are what happens when a central authority to interpret the Bible and establish dogmas of the faith isn’t established. Everyone interprets things differently and sometimes quite wrongly.My ideas? These are your Catholic scholars and Encyclopedias.>>530423875John L McKenzie is the greatest Catholic scholar of the 20th century. The New Catholic Encyclopedia is YOUR encyclopedia, not mine. John L Mckenzie is a Jesuit member. His book, Dictionary of the Bible, has been branded Imprimatur by the Vatican. The Vatican quotes the Catholic Encyclopedia on their website.
>>530423714How many times has the bible been rewritten? and by what group of people? i thought Catholic came around because of too many kikes rewriting the bible. and they had the Spanish inquisition to stop all that?
>>530424692Tell that to your own scholars and Encyclopedias. >>530424975>>530424395>>530424692The fact it’s still around and going strong points to Divine Guidance>(2 Corinthians 11:13-15) For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. 14And no wonder, for Satan himself keeps transforming himself into an angel of light.FOR SATAN HIMSELF KEEPS TRANSFORMING HIMSELF INTO AN ANGEL OF LIGHT 15IT IS THEREFORE NOTHING GREAT IF HIS MINISTERS ALSO KEEP TRANSFORMING THEMSELVES INTO MINISTERS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS...
>>530419766Outside the church there is no salvation...psych. The church doesn't even teach that anymore. Too cucked.
>>530419766>Vatican II>Nostra Aetatesome house cleaning is necessary before the Church can undertake a major Evangelizing mission
>>530425094>How many times has the bible been rewritten?Never. >and by what group of people?There were attempts but they failed because of thousands of preexisting manuscripts that prevented that. >i thought Catholic came around because of too many kikes rewriting the bible.Catholics and kikes are two sides of the same coin. One is the Synagogue of Satan; the other The Son of Destruction/Disobedience. Both of them ministers of Satan. They are the original Left Wing and Right Wing of the ancient world. Both wings belonging to Satan. and they had the Spanish inquisition to stop all that?
>>530425505>Never.So why cant i find have the old Bible Verses? fucking kike.
>>530425643forgot pic
>>530425643>So why cant i find have the old Bible Verses???
Really the issue with non-Catholic Christianity is that when you're lying about something, uncoordinated liars will create issues when their lies contradict the other lies too obviously. Which is pretty common if you're talking about something that can't be resolved through testing since none of it is real.
>>530424975Why? Are you worried people realize what Christianity actually is?
>>530427822
>>530427822Because you already got your own thread up. Don't derail this one.
>>530427896Alright.
>>530419766
>>530419766Mutt religion for browns. Africa is the only growing market for your kike on a stick worship and eventually you’ll have a black pope. You are FOR this, yes? Being a catholic is about obeying and not thinking so whatever mommy church says is what you think too. And mommy church says blacks is the future and what heaven is full of. That is your heavenly ideal.
>>530419766Whenever I hear the world "catholic" I instantly start thinking about my country being flooded with niggers and other assorted browns.
You faggots had your chance for 2000 years and all you managed to do was lead us to our absolute state rn on the precipice of our enslavement/replacement. Caused endless brother wars. Destroyed all the knowledge of our ancestors from antiquity. Gave birth to the great lie of egalitarianism. Gave birth to all the secular liberal humanists who took the lie of egalitarianism and made it even more subversive to our people. And you were among the first to go to the third world to lift up you bros in christ. The only thing that will save the West is a renaissance of the solar/heroic spirituality of ancient Greece and pre-christcuck Rome.
>>530428081Why are you doing this? Is this supposed to mean something?
>>530428444That he's a Ziliansavage.They think it's cool and edgy or something. They have no idea of respect other than being beaten into submission.
>>530428444
>>530419766indeed
>>530419766"Trad" Christians or whatever they call themselves have done irreperable damage to the image of the Church in the recent decade. The pendulum would have swung towards increased societal religiousity if it wasn't for cringe digital crusader roleplayers trying to shove it down peoples' throats, who wants to be associated with that? I've met some Priests over the years, and never have I seen them spew out the kind of low-IQ shit OP just posted. Although it is mildly preferable to incoherent schizo-posting of scripture that wouldn't even make sense to Thomas Aquinas.
