I have no idea any more what is or isnt a.i.
>>530496011That's because your ai
>>530496011its actually really simple and i have no idea how people have not noticed it yetwhen it comes to images, the best strategy is to trust your gut, shadows, fingers these will turn unreliable way to tell very soon if they have not already, so focus on harmless melanin cancer skin condition, these are small brown bumps that grow over your arms and legs in early childhood, if you spot some of these, its probably a real human and not an AInow let's talk about textthis one is actually incredibly easy to spot, and i do not think if they made it that way on purpose, but most people still fall for itbasically it goes like thisX is not X, but X is Yif you encounter this ->X is not X, but X is Ythen its AIhere is example propaganda channel that abuses AI to a massive extend and there is not a single sentence in a single video, that is not X is not X, but X is Yhttps://www.youtube.com/@TheMilitaryShowif its not exactlyX is not X, but X is Yits some variation ofX is not X, but X is Yeven when ChatGPT itself sucks your cock it uses the sameX is not X, but X is Yfor example`You're not just doing nothing, you're doing something``You're not just doing nothing, you're preparing for when you're gonna do stuff``You're not just a peasant, you're a king`any variation ofX is not X, but X is Ymeans its AItheX is not X, but X is Ysequence, basically tries to edit your human memory in the most stupid way possible, by telling you to edit your memory yourself as at least you know how to do it another red flag at least on 4chan is, as anon pointed out today, is the lack of images in thread on an image board, 300 replies, 6 of them are imagesanother way to tell is by SUBSTANCE * LENGTHthe lengthier the reply gets times the lesser substance it has in between words (pure philosophical gibberish garbage that sound wise but it does not mean anything) the more like it is, it is AI
>>530496011Anal Intelligence
>>530496011if it supports your worldview, it's realif it doesn't, it's ai
>>530499098now you probably have not seen this before, because its rare, but i once found a thread on 4chan with 100% ai generated content it was on /pol/i was outside listening to some random concert in the city town, something i actually never do so but decided to do because i was on my way homei was browsing 4chan thereand i saw a weird thread, clicked on itevery single post was just a massive wall of text of philosophical gibberish replying to another massive wall of text of philosophical gibberish replying to another one of those, the thread went like this for 300 replies with not a single human on it, it even had images and all the posts had weird syntax artifacts like quotes everywherei felt incredibly surreal and incredibly lonely when i saw this, as 4chan was the only place on the entire internet that would accept you without making an account, because i am actually perma/shadow/device/id banned from Instagram, Facebook, SnapChat and even ChitChat, EmeraldChat and other
simulation theory looking more real everyday isnt it?
>>530496011anything you like is real, anything you don't like is ai
>>530496011Its irrelevant when its all shit
>>530499509i'd call it lazinessthere were ways to prevent it as `Art Chad` said in his `Death Internet` videoin fact i can tell you one way right nowa button that once you press it, you get text slowly being presented to you, one horizontal line by one horizontal line at a time, until you see the word on it, and then you have to write the word that you seethe premise of this CAPCHA is that, humans will collectively EXHAUST at the same time, giving a baseline for what is human and what is AI, AI will either wait until the text on the button is fully shown, or guess it immediately by calculating and accounting for font intrinsicthis test will solve the 100 year old question`who is a human and who is a robot`how can you prove a robot is a robot, if you cannot even prove a human is a humanthe test i described earlier, does prove humanity without even biological interferencethe reason nobody uses it is because nobody had time to think prepare for something that might have never happened to begin with, at least not in their lifetime
>>530499509No because people that say simulation theory have never explained what they mean by saying those words.
>>530500000wasted digits on AI sloppa
>>530499462Do you remember when Trump announced that he had COVID and had to quarantine for treatment, then suddenly, thousands of different twitter accounts began mass replying to Trump's most recent tweets, posting weird creepy symbols and text with strange creepy images attached to some of them, as though they were cursing Trump with spells and trying to give more energy to the virus. There were thousands of them posting the creepy shit on every twitter thread related to COVID/Trump
>>530502087i do not use Twitter, X, TruthSocial, but if you have screencaps will be interesting to see them, AI was not even commercial yet when everyone was buying likes and comments and one might argue that those low paid chinese troll farms operated by people are no different than bots
>>530496011Its going to get even worse.
>>530496011I don't even fully believe what I see IRL with my own eyes. Distrust and verify, it's the only way to be sure.
50% chance something is AI. Either it is or it isn’t. Capiche?
>>530496011this means you're ready for the next evolutionary step, anon.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cUR4up6EBLA
>>530496011Truth is there is a lack of anything so everyone is thirsty so fakes for clicks are on high demand. Also jews want to well poison so expect fake shit.
>>530496011if you can't tell even at this stage, then you should really just get off the internet
>>530496011b-b-but AI is real so what are you babbling about?
>>530496011This is why I went back to newspapers (non-jew owned). People laugh at me but I really enjoy having something real.
>>530502820whats worse is that everything is curated by various algorithms, so you get things like the mr. beast soiface, or ai generated thumbnails on videos, or people self-censoring their content/opinion to appease the algo. it's a full on simulacrum at this point, and people are being born into it so they don't even see it for what it is. not to mention the brownoids and jeets that signal boost all of this slop into the stratosphere.
>>530496011just assume everything is AI.
>>530504447there are some good ai generations though https://youtu.be/rEEGqIuU1oM?t=3422https://youtu.be/jXMfZdujlSE?t=3501like its not like it could not have been used for something useful
>>530496011Duuuude. Literally everything is fake and gay. How do you not know this by now?
>>530496011Interactions are usually too intense in AI, even if you can't tell the images apart from reality. Too much shit happens in those short vids. The way people talk, the way the camera pans etc. are clear indicators.
>>530504447Is this real??
